PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GQETX vs. HAVGX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GQETX vs. HAVGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GMO Quality Fund (GQETX) and Haverford Quality Growth Stock Fund (HAVGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GQETX achieves a 7.37% return, which is significantly higher than HAVGX's 5.53% return. Over the past 10 years, GQETX has outperformed HAVGX with an annualized return of 15.89%, while HAVGX has yielded a comparatively lower 11.68% annualized return.


GQETX

1D
0.80%
1M
0.69%
6M
4.85%
YTD
7.37%
1Y
22.56%
3Y*
16.24%
5Y*
12.74%
10Y*
15.89%
ALL TIME*
11.71%

HAVGX

1D
0.19%
1M
2.58%
6M
2.54%
YTD
5.53%
1Y
13.27%
3Y*
11.87%
5Y*
8.67%
10Y*
11.68%
ALL TIME*
8.06%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

GQETX vs. HAVGX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GQETX
GMO Quality Fund
7.37%19.61%17.76%28.94%-15.33%31.67%18.33%31.77%0.50%29.11%
HAVGX
Haverford Quality Growth Stock Fund
5.53%13.22%15.58%9.26%-7.97%24.40%15.35%33.26%-5.90%18.46%

Correlation

The correlation between GQETX and HAVGX is 0.83, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.83

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.85

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.89

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.90

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2005

0.91

The correlation between GQETX and HAVGX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.83 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GQETX vs. HAVGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

GQETX
GQETX Risk / Return Rank: 5353
Overall Rank
GQETX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GQETX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
GQETX Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
GQETX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3636
Calmar Ratio Rank
GQETX Martin Ratio Rank: 4242
Martin Ratio Rank

HAVGX
HAVGX Risk / Return Rank: 3333
Overall Rank
HAVGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3434
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HAVGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3535
Sortino Ratio Rank
HAVGX Omega Ratio Rank: 3232
Omega Ratio Rank
HAVGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2828
Calmar Ratio Rank
HAVGX Martin Ratio Rank: 3535
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

GQETX vs. HAVGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GMO Quality Fund (GQETX) and Haverford Quality Growth Stock Fund (HAVGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


GQETXHAVGXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.48

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.58

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

1.21

+0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.66

1.36

+0.30

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.56

5.48

+1.08

GQETX vs. HAVGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GQETX Sharpe Ratio is 1.66, which is higher than the HAVGX Sharpe Ratio of 1.18. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GQETX and HAVGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

GQETX vs. HAVGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GQETX drawdown since its inception was -39.99%, smaller than the maximum HAVGX drawdown of -50.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GQETX and HAVGX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GQETXHAVGXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-39.99%

-50.37%

+10.38%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.76%

-8.90%

-3.86%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.54%

-15.85%

+0.31%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.22%

-21.65%

-2.57%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-30.44%

-34.50%

+4.06%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.37%

+0.37%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.97%

-6.43%

+1.46%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.23%

2.20%

+1.03%

Volatility

GQETX vs. HAVGX - Volatility Comparison

GMO Quality Fund (GQETX) and Haverford Quality Growth Stock Fund (HAVGX) have volatilities of 3.19% and 3.28%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GQETXHAVGXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.19%

3.28%

-0.09%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.18%

7.97%

+2.21%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.83%

10.26%

+2.57%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.93%

14.70%

+1.23%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.06%

16.99%

+0.07%

GQETX vs. HAVGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

GQETX has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is lower than HAVGX's 0.80% expense ratio.


Dividends

GQETX vs. HAVGX - Dividend Comparison

GQETX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.15%, more than HAVGX's 7.82% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GQETX
GMO Quality Fund
11.15%11.16%3.91%3.43%11.85%10.19%13.61%8.08%21.66%8.10%3.56%17.25%
HAVGX
Haverford Quality Growth Stock Fund
7.82%8.28%8.54%4.76%10.14%5.65%0.84%1.39%6.38%2.65%1.18%1.26%

Frequently Asked Questions


GQETX and HAVGX have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

HAVGX has higher volatility (3.28%) compared to GQETX (3.19%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GQETX dropped -39.99% vs HAVGX's -50.37%.

GQETX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.66 vs 1.18), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GQETX and HAVGX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer