GPT vs. FIXT
GPT (Intelligent Alpha Atlas ETF) and FIXT (Procure Disaster Recovery Strategy ETF) are both Global Equities funds. GPT is actively managed, while FIXT is passively managed. At a 0.23 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. GPT charges 0.69%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for FIXT.
Performance
GPT vs. FIXT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GPT achieves a 12.68% return, which is significantly higher than FIXT's 0.23% return.
GPT
- 1D
- -0.31%
- 1M
- 2.33%
- YTD
- 12.68%
- 6M
- 11.45%
- 1Y
- 31.43%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FIXT
- 1D
- -0.24%
- 1M
- 0.27%
- YTD
- 0.23%
- 6M
- 0.07%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GPT vs. FIXT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
GPT Intelligent Alpha Atlas ETF | 12.68% | 15.30% |
FIXT Procure Disaster Recovery Strategy ETF | 0.23% | 4.58% |
Correlation
The correlation between GPT and FIXT is 0.23, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 17, 2025 | 0.23 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GPT vs. FIXT — Risk / Return Rank
GPT
FIXT
GPT vs. FIXT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Intelligent Alpha Atlas ETF (GPT) and Procure Disaster Recovery Strategy ETF (FIXT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GPT | FIXT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.52 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.47 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GPT | FIXT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.79 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.96 | 1.34 | -0.38 |
Drawdowns
GPT vs. FIXT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GPT drawdown since its inception was -25.59%, which is greater than FIXT's maximum drawdown of -3.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GPT and FIXT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GPT | FIXT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -25.59% | -3.02% | -22.57% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.97% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.76% | -1.88% | +1.12% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.26% | -0.71% | -3.55% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.34% | — | — |
Volatility
GPT vs. FIXT - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GPT | FIXT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.79% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.45% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.61% | 3.77% | +13.84% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.69% | 3.77% | +16.92% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.69% | 3.77% | +16.92% |
GPT vs. FIXT - Expense Ratio Comparison
GPT has a 0.69% expense ratio, which is lower than FIXT's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
GPT vs. FIXT - Dividend Comparison
GPT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.67%, less than FIXT's 5.55% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
FIXT Procure Disaster Recovery Strategy ETF | 5.55% | 3.24% | 0.00% |
GPT Intelligent Alpha Atlas ETF | 0.67% | 0.75% | 0.19% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GPT and FIXT have a correlation of 0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, GPT is cheaper at 0.69% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
GPT is cheaper with a 0.69% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for FIXT.
FIXT has the higher dividend yield at 5.55%, compared with 0.67% for GPT.
They also come from different issuers: Intelligent Alpha and Procure. Their fees differ too: 0.69% for GPT and 0.75% for FIXT.
Find the right allocation for GPT and FIXT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer