GPT vs. FIXT

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

GPT (Intelligent Alpha Atlas ETF) and FIXT (Procure Disaster Recovery Strategy ETF) are both Global Equities funds. GPT is actively managed, while FIXT is passively managed. Over the past year, GPT returned 30.02% vs 4.69% for FIXT. At a 0.23 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. GPT charges 0.69%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for FIXT.

Performance

GPT vs. FIXT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Intelligent Alpha Atlas ETF (GPT) and Procure Disaster Recovery Strategy ETF (FIXT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GPT achieves a 11.47% return, which is significantly higher than FIXT's 0.71% return.

GPT

• 1D: -2.58%
• 1M: 0.22%
• YTD: 11.47%
• 6M: 9.96%
• 1Y: 30.02%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

FIXT

• 1D: 0.14%
• 1M: 1.07%
• YTD: 0.71%
• 6M: 0.66%
• 1Y: 4.69%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GPT vs. FIXT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
GPT Intelligent Alpha Atlas ETF	11.47%	16.55%
FIXT Procure Disaster Recovery Strategy ETF	0.71%	4.57%

Correlation

The correlation between GPT and FIXT is 0.23, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.23
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 16, 2025	0.23

Return for Risk

GPT vs. FIXT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GPT

GPT Risk / Return Rank: 60
GPT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 53
GPT Sortino Ratio Rank: 51
GPT Omega Ratio Rank: 51
GPT Calmar Ratio Rank: 73
GPT Martin Ratio Rank: 73

FIXT

FIXT Risk / Return Rank: 36
FIXT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 38
FIXT Sortino Ratio Rank: 39
FIXT Omega Ratio Rank: 36
FIXT Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
FIXT Martin Ratio Rank: 32

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GPT vs. FIXT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Intelligent Alpha Atlas ETF (GPT) and Procure Disaster Recovery Strategy ETF (FIXT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	GPT	FIXT	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.64	1.26	+0.38
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.28	1.89	+0.39
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.29	1.22	+0.07
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.36	1.56	+1.80
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	12.48	4.33	+8.15

GPT vs. FIXT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GPT Sharpe Ratio is 1.64, which is higher than the FIXT Sharpe Ratio of 1.26. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GPT and FIXT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

GPT vs. FIXT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GPT drawdown since its inception was -25.59%, which is greater than FIXT's maximum drawdown of -3.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GPT and FIXT.

Drawdown Indicators

	GPT	FIXT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-25.59%	-3.02%	-22.57%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.97%	-3.02%	-5.95%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.58%	-1.42%	-1.16%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.19%	-0.75%	-3.44%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.41%	1.08%	+1.33%

Volatility

GPT vs. FIXT - Volatility Comparison

Intelligent Alpha Atlas ETF (GPT) has a higher volatility of 6.20% compared to Procure Disaster Recovery Strategy ETF (FIXT) at 0.91%. This indicates that GPT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FIXT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	GPT	FIXT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.20%	0.91%	+5.29%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	15.19%	2.48%	+12.71%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	18.39%	3.77%	+14.62%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	20.81%	3.74%	+17.07%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	20.81%	3.74%	+17.07%

GPT vs. FIXT - Expense Ratio Comparison

GPT has a 0.69% expense ratio, which is lower than FIXT's 0.75% expense ratio.

Dividends

GPT vs. FIXT - Dividend Comparison

GPT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.68%, less than FIXT's 5.52% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
FIXT Procure Disaster Recovery Strategy ETF	5.52%	3.24%	0.00%
GPT Intelligent Alpha Atlas ETF	0.68%	0.75%	0.19%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both GPT and FIXT in my portfolio?

GPT and FIXT have a correlation of 0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, GPT or FIXT?

GPT has higher volatility (6.20%) compared to FIXT (0.91%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GPT dropped -25.59% vs FIXT's -3.02%.

Which ETF is better, GPT or FIXT?

On 1-year performance, GPT leads with 30.02% vs 4.69% for FIXT. On fees, GPT is cheaper at 0.69% per year. On volatility, FIXT has been the lower-risk option at 0.91%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, GPT or FIXT?

Over the 1-year period, GPT has performed better with a 30.02% return vs 4.69%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, GPT or FIXT?

GPT is cheaper with a 0.69% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for FIXT.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, GPT or FIXT?

FIXT has the higher dividend yield at 5.52%, compared with 0.68% for GPT.

What is the main difference between GPT and FIXT?

They also come from different issuers: Intelligent Alpha and Procure. Their fees differ too: 0.69% for GPT and 0.75% for FIXT.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

GPT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.64 vs 1.26), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.