GPMT vs. JEPQ
GPMT (Granite Point Mortgage Trust Inc.) is a stock, while JEPQ (JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Income ETF) is Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the Nasdaq-100 Index. Over the past 3 years, GPMT returned -24.94%/yr vs 20.81%/yr for JEPQ. At a 0.35 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
GPMT vs. JEPQ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GPMT achieves a -33.54% return, which is significantly lower than JEPQ's 9.42% return.
GPMT
- 1D
- 1.32%
- 1M
- 8.45%
- YTD
- -33.54%
- 6M
- -40.77%
- 1Y
- -34.47%
- 3Y*
- -24.94%
- 5Y*
- -29.47%
- 10Y*
- —
JEPQ
- 1D
- -0.12%
- 1M
- 3.79%
- YTD
- 9.42%
- 6M
- 9.57%
- 1Y
- 28.59%
- 3Y*
- 20.81%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GPMT vs. JEPQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GPMT Granite Point Mortgage Trust Inc. | -33.54% | -7.03% | -49.00% | 28.79% | -43.30% |
JEPQ JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Income ETF | 9.42% | 15.18% | 24.85% | 36.28% | -12.89% |
Correlation
The correlation between GPMT and JEPQ is 0.26, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.26 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.27 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 5, 2022 | 0.35 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GPMT vs. JEPQ — Risk / Return Rank
GPMT
JEPQ
GPMT vs. JEPQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Granite Point Mortgage Trust Inc. (GPMT) and JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Income ETF (JEPQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GPMT | JEPQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -3.20 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -4.20 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.89 | 1.48 | -0.59 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.63 | 3.26 | -3.89 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.20 | 15.99 | -17.19 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GPMT | JEPQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.75 | 2.45 | -3.20 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.68 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.20 | 1.00 | -1.20 |
Drawdowns
GPMT vs. JEPQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GPMT drawdown since its inception was -87.96%, which is greater than JEPQ's maximum drawdown of -20.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GPMT and JEPQ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GPMT | JEPQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -87.96% | -20.07% | -67.89% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -54.89% | -8.82% | -46.07% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -74.35% | -20.07% | -54.28% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -85.94% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -84.73% | -0.21% | -84.52% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -40.63% | -3.42% | -37.21% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 28.76% | 1.79% | +26.97% |
Volatility
GPMT vs. JEPQ - Volatility Comparison
Granite Point Mortgage Trust Inc. (GPMT) has a higher volatility of 14.79% compared to JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Income ETF (JEPQ) at 1.28%. This indicates that GPMT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than JEPQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GPMT | JEPQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 14.79% | 1.28% | +13.51% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 36.43% | 9.06% | +27.37% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 46.02% | 11.72% | +34.30% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 43.78% | 16.60% | +27.18% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 85.68% | 16.60% | +69.08% |
Dividends
GPMT vs. JEPQ - Dividend Comparison
GPMT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.99%, more than JEPQ's 10.08% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GPMT Granite Point Mortgage Trust Inc. | 12.99% | 8.33% | 10.75% | 13.47% | 17.72% | 8.54% | 6.51% | 9.14% | 8.99% | 3.95% |
JEPQ JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Income ETF | 10.08% | 10.53% | 9.65% | 10.03% | 9.44% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GPMT and JEPQ have a correlation of 0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GPMT has higher volatility (14.79%) compared to JEPQ (1.28%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GPMT dropped -87.96% vs JEPQ's -20.07%.
JEPQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.45 vs -0.75), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GPMT and JEPQ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer