PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GPIX vs. ZVOL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GPIX vs. ZVOL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Goldman Sachs S&P 500 Premium Income ETF (GPIX) and Volatility Premium Plus ETF (ZVOL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GPIX achieves a 9.91% return, which is significantly higher than ZVOL's -2.29% return.


GPIX

1D
-0.48%
1M
4.27%
YTD
9.91%
6M
10.34%
1Y
25.55%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

ZVOL

1D
-0.60%
1M
2.30%
YTD
-2.29%
6M
2.14%
1Y
8.27%
3Y*
9.26%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GPIX vs. ZVOL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
GPIX
Goldman Sachs S&P 500 Premium Income ETF
9.91%16.25%21.77%13.45%
ZVOL
Volatility Premium Plus ETF
-2.29%-10.71%9.27%27.41%

Correlation

The correlation between GPIX and ZVOL is 0.70, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.70

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 27, 2023

0.67

The correlation between GPIX and ZVOL has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.67 to 0.70 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GPIX vs. ZVOL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GPIX
GPIX Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
GPIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GPIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
GPIX Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
GPIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
GPIX Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank

ZVOL
ZVOL Risk / Return Rank: 1616
Overall Rank
ZVOL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1515
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ZVOL Sortino Ratio Rank: 1616
Sortino Ratio Rank
ZVOL Omega Ratio Rank: 1515
Omega Ratio Rank
ZVOL Calmar Ratio Rank: 1515
Calmar Ratio Rank
ZVOL Martin Ratio Rank: 1717
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GPIX vs. ZVOL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs S&P 500 Premium Income ETF (GPIX) and Volatility Premium Plus ETF (ZVOL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GPIXZVOLDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.08

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.69

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.48

1.09

+0.39

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.33

0.50

+2.83

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

16.77

1.62

+15.15

GPIX vs. ZVOL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GPIX Sharpe Ratio is 2.52, which is higher than the ZVOL Sharpe Ratio of 0.44. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GPIX and ZVOL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GPIXZVOLDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.52

0.44

+2.08

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.78

0.43

+1.35

Drawdowns

GPIX vs. ZVOL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GPIX drawdown since its inception was -17.50%, smaller than the maximum ZVOL drawdown of -37.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GPIX and ZVOL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GPIXZVOLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-17.50%

-37.25%

+19.75%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.71%

-16.46%

+8.75%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-37.25%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.48%

-22.17%

+21.69%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.48%

-13.43%

+11.95%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.53%

5.12%

-3.59%

Volatility

GPIX vs. ZVOL - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Goldman Sachs S&P 500 Premium Income ETF (GPIX) is 2.26%, while Volatility Premium Plus ETF (ZVOL) has a volatility of 3.59%. This indicates that GPIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ZVOL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GPIXZVOLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.26%

3.59%

-1.33%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.89%

13.27%

-5.38%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.17%

18.74%

-8.57%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.80%

29.27%

-15.47%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.80%

29.27%

-15.47%

GPIX vs. ZVOL - Expense Ratio Comparison

GPIX has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is lower than ZVOL's 1.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

GPIX vs. ZVOL - Dividend Comparison

GPIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.00%, less than ZVOL's 71.14% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023
GPIX
Goldman Sachs S&P 500 Premium Income ETF
8.00%8.01%7.45%1.40%
ZVOL
Volatility Premium Plus ETF
71.14%53.44%30.68%0.55%

Frequently Asked Questions


GPIX and ZVOL have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ZVOL has higher volatility (3.59%) compared to GPIX (2.26%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GPIX dropped -17.50% vs ZVOL's -37.25%.

On 1-year performance, GPIX leads with 25.55% vs 8.27% for ZVOL. On fees, GPIX is cheaper at 0.29% per year. On volatility, GPIX has been the lower-risk option at 2.26%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, GPIX has performed better with a 25.55% return vs 8.27%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

GPIX is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 1.35% for ZVOL.

ZVOL has the higher dividend yield at 71.14%, compared with 8.00% for GPIX.

GPIX is categorized as Derivative Income, while ZVOL is Volatility. They also come from different issuers: Goldman Sachs and Volatility Shares. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for GPIX and 1.35% for ZVOL.

GPIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.52 vs 0.44), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GPIX and ZVOL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer