GPIX vs. IVVW
GPIX (Goldman Sachs S&P 500 Premium Income ETF) and IVVW (iShares S&P 500 BuyWrite ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. GPIX is actively managed, while IVVW is passively managed. Over the past year, GPIX returned 25.55% vs 20.07% for IVVW. Their correlation of 0.89 suggests significant overlap in exposure. GPIX charges 0.29%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for IVVW.
Performance
GPIX vs. IVVW - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GPIX achieves a 9.91% return, which is significantly higher than IVVW's 4.84% return.
GPIX
- 1D
- -0.48%
- 1M
- 4.27%
- YTD
- 9.91%
- 6M
- 10.34%
- 1Y
- 25.55%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IVVW
- 1D
- -0.02%
- 1M
- 1.90%
- YTD
- 4.84%
- 6M
- 6.58%
- 1Y
- 20.07%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GPIX vs. IVVW - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
GPIX Goldman Sachs S&P 500 Premium Income ETF | 9.91% | 16.25% | 14.56% |
IVVW iShares S&P 500 BuyWrite ETF | 4.84% | 11.71% | 12.90% |
Correlation
The correlation between GPIX and IVVW is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.86 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 18, 2024 | 0.89 |
The correlation between GPIX and IVVW has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.86 to 0.89 - a consistent structural relationship.
GPIX vs. IVVW - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
GPIX
IVVW
Technology
Financial Services
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Technology
GPIX
IVVW
Financial Services
GPIX
IVVW
Communication Services
GPIX
IVVW
Consumer Cyclical
GPIX
IVVW
Healthcare
GPIX
IVVW
Industrials
GPIX
IVVW
Consumer Defensive
GPIX
IVVW
Energy
GPIX
IVVW
Utilities
GPIX
IVVW
Real Estate
GPIX
IVVW
Basic Materials
GPIX
IVVW
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GPIX vs. IVVW — Risk / Return Rank
GPIX
IVVW
GPIX vs. IVVW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs S&P 500 Premium Income ETF (GPIX) and iShares S&P 500 BuyWrite ETF (IVVW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GPIX | IVVW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.20 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.29 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.48 | 1.61 | -0.13 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.33 | 3.47 | -0.14 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 16.77 | 19.13 | -2.36 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GPIX | IVVW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.52 | 2.73 | -0.20 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.78 | 1.07 | +0.71 |
Drawdowns
GPIX vs. IVVW - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GPIX drawdown since its inception was -17.50%, roughly equal to the maximum IVVW drawdown of -16.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GPIX and IVVW.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GPIX | IVVW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -17.50% | -16.79% | -0.71% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.71% | -5.81% | -1.90% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.48% | -0.09% | -0.39% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.48% | -1.75% | +0.27% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.53% | 1.05% | +0.48% |
Volatility
GPIX vs. IVVW - Volatility Comparison
Goldman Sachs S&P 500 Premium Income ETF (GPIX) has a higher volatility of 2.26% compared to iShares S&P 500 BuyWrite ETF (IVVW) at 1.13%. This indicates that GPIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IVVW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GPIX | IVVW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.26% | 1.13% | +1.13% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.89% | 6.07% | +1.82% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.17% | 7.40% | +2.77% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.80% | 12.66% | +1.14% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.80% | 12.66% | +1.14% |
GPIX vs. IVVW - Expense Ratio Comparison
GPIX has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is higher than IVVW's 0.25% expense ratio.
Dividends
GPIX vs. IVVW - Dividend Comparison
GPIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.00%, less than IVVW's 19.70% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
GPIX Goldman Sachs S&P 500 Premium Income ETF | 8.00% | 8.01% | 7.45% | 1.40% |
IVVW iShares S&P 500 BuyWrite ETF | 19.70% | 18.55% | 13.72% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GPIX and IVVW have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GPIX has higher volatility (2.26%) compared to IVVW (1.13%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GPIX dropped -17.50% vs IVVW's -16.79%.
On 1-year performance, GPIX leads with 25.55% vs 20.07% for IVVW. On fees, IVVW is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, IVVW has been the lower-risk option at 1.13%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, GPIX has performed better with a 25.55% return vs 20.07%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IVVW is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.29% for GPIX.
IVVW has the higher dividend yield at 19.70%, compared with 8.00% for GPIX.
They also come from different issuers: Goldman Sachs and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for GPIX and 0.25% for IVVW.
IVVW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.73 vs 2.52), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GPIX and IVVW
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer