GPIGX vs. FSWCX

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

GPIGX (GuidepathGrowth and Income Fund) and FSWCX (Fidelity SAI U.S. Value Index Fund) are both Large Cap Value Equities funds. Over the past 5 years, GPIGX returned 8.92%/yr vs 14.05%/yr for FSWCX. Their correlation of 0.86 suggests significant overlap in exposure. GPIGX charges 0.85%/yr vs 0.10%/yr for FSWCX.

Performance

GPIGX vs. FSWCX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GuidepathGrowth and Income Fund (GPIGX) and Fidelity SAI U.S. Value Index Fund (FSWCX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GPIGX achieves a 10.02% return, which is significantly lower than FSWCX's 15.32% return.

GPIGX

• 1D: -0.37%
• 1M: 1.95%
• YTD: 10.02%
• 6M: 9.79%
• 1Y: 19.93%
• 3Y*: 14.90%
• 5Y*: 8.92%
• 10Y*: —

FSWCX

• 1D: -0.77%
• 1M: 5.44%
• YTD: 15.32%
• 6M: 17.70%
• 1Y: 38.57%
• 3Y*: 24.03%
• 5Y*: 14.05%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GPIGX vs. FSWCX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
GPIGX GuidepathGrowth and Income Fund	10.02%	9.12%	17.85%	9.54%	-7.89%	20.43%	6.24%	15.88%	-6.95%
FSWCX Fidelity SAI U.S. Value Index Fund	15.32%	22.50%	19.90%	12.64%	-3.50%	30.43%	-4.44%	29.09%	-13.18%

Correlation

The correlation between GPIGX and FSWCX is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.83
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.85
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.87
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 21, 2018	0.86

The correlation between GPIGX and FSWCX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.83 to 0.87 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

GPIGX vs. FSWCX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GPIGX

GPIGX Risk / Return Rank: 54
GPIGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 51
GPIGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 51
GPIGX Omega Ratio Rank: 48
GPIGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 64
GPIGX Martin Ratio Rank: 56

FSWCX

FSWCX Risk / Return Rank: 94
FSWCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 95
FSWCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 93
FSWCX Omega Ratio Rank: 88
FSWCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 97
FSWCX Martin Ratio Rank: 96

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GPIGX vs. FSWCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GuidepathGrowth and Income Fund (GPIGX) and Fidelity SAI U.S. Value Index Fund (FSWCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	GPIGX	FSWCX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.08	3.42	-1.33
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.98	4.70	-1.72
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.37	1.63	-0.25
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.05	6.63	-3.58
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	11.09	23.30	-12.21
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

GPIGX vs. FSWCX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GPIGX Sharpe Ratio is 2.08, which is lower than the FSWCX Sharpe Ratio of 3.42. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GPIGX and FSWCX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	GPIGX	FSWCX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.08	3.42	-1.33
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.74	0.85	-0.10
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.65	0.59	+0.06

Drawdowns

GPIGX vs. FSWCX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GPIGX drawdown since its inception was -27.88%, smaller than the maximum FSWCX drawdown of -41.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GPIGX and FSWCX.

Drawdown Indicators

	GPIGX	FSWCX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-27.88%	-41.41%	+13.53%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.44%	-5.77%	-0.67%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-14.99%	-16.13%	+1.14%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-16.34%	-19.62%	+3.28%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.37%	-0.77%	+0.40%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.24%	-5.57%	+1.33%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.77%	1.64%	+0.13%

Volatility

GPIGX vs. FSWCX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for GuidepathGrowth and Income Fund (GPIGX) is 2.45%, while Fidelity SAI U.S. Value Index Fund (FSWCX) has a volatility of 2.89%. This indicates that GPIGX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FSWCX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	GPIGX	FSWCX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.45%	2.89%	-0.44%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	6.92%	7.69%	-0.77%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	9.44%	11.23%	-1.79%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	12.07%	16.71%	-4.64%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	13.82%	20.78%	-6.96%

GPIGX vs. FSWCX - Expense Ratio Comparison

GPIGX has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than FSWCX's 0.10% expense ratio.

Dividends

GPIGX vs. FSWCX - Dividend Comparison

GPIGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 13.46%, more than FSWCX's 6.42% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FSWCX Fidelity SAI U.S. Value Index Fund	6.42%	7.40%	8.86%	9.68%	12.90%	5.71%	2.55%	2.37%	3.84%	0.07%
GPIGX GuidepathGrowth and Income Fund	13.46%	14.61%	1.33%	2.55%	1.62%	14.44%	1.30%	1.38%	2.37%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both GPIGX and FSWCX in my portfolio?

GPIGX and FSWCX have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, GPIGX or FSWCX?

FSWCX has higher volatility (2.89%) compared to GPIGX (2.45%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GPIGX dropped -27.88% vs FSWCX's -41.41%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FSWCX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.42 vs 2.08), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.