GPAIX vs. CGFIX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

GPAIX (Grant Park Multi Alternative Strategies Fund) and CGFIX (abrdn Global Absolute Return Strategies Fund) are both Macro Trading funds. Over the past 10 years, GPAIX returned 4.90%/yr vs 1.89%/yr for CGFIX. At a 0.18 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. GPAIX charges 1.43%/yr vs 0.78%/yr for CGFIX.

Performance

GPAIX vs. CGFIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Grant Park Multi Alternative Strategies Fund (GPAIX) and abrdn Global Absolute Return Strategies Fund (CGFIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GPAIX achieves a 5.70% return, which is significantly higher than CGFIX's 1.38% return. Over the past 10 years, GPAIX has outperformed CGFIX with an annualized return of 4.90%, while CGFIX has yielded a comparatively lower 1.89% annualized return.

GPAIX

• 1D: 0.25%
• 1M: 0.75%
• YTD: 5.70%
• 6M: 6.85%
• 1Y: 16.64%
• 3Y*: 7.77%
• 5Y*: 4.31%
• 10Y*: 4.90%

CGFIX

• 1D: 0.12%
• 1M: 0.81%
• YTD: 1.38%
• 6M: 1.22%
• 1Y: 6.65%
• 3Y*: 4.66%
• 5Y*: 0.31%
• 10Y*: 1.89%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GPAIX vs. CGFIX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
GPAIX Grant Park Multi Alternative Strategies Fund	5.70%	12.24%	1.33%	4.02%	-1.88%	5.70%	9.09%	14.33%	-5.96%	12.36%
CGFIX abrdn Global Absolute Return Strategies Fund	1.38%	5.79%	4.85%	-2.54%	-9.99%	1.39%	6.37%	7.26%	0.97%	1.62%

Correlation

The correlation between GPAIX and CGFIX is 0.29, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.29
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.27
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.22
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.21
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2014	0.18

The correlation between GPAIX and CGFIX shifts across timeframes, from 0.18 (all time) to 0.29 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

GPAIX vs. CGFIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GPAIX

GPAIX Risk / Return Rank: 49
GPAIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 53
GPAIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 47
GPAIX Omega Ratio Rank: 54
GPAIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 53
GPAIX Martin Ratio Rank: 35

CGFIX

CGFIX Risk / Return Rank: 50
CGFIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 54
CGFIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
CGFIX Omega Ratio Rank: 57
CGFIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 42
CGFIX Martin Ratio Rank: 41

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GPAIX vs. CGFIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Grant Park Multi Alternative Strategies Fund (GPAIX) and abrdn Global Absolute Return Strategies Fund (CGFIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	GPAIX	CGFIX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.13	2.17	-0.04
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.91	3.12	-0.21
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.40	1.42	-0.02
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.78	2.45	+0.33
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	7.90	8.82	-0.92
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

GPAIX vs. CGFIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GPAIX Sharpe Ratio is 2.13, which is comparable to the CGFIX Sharpe Ratio of 2.17. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GPAIX and CGFIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	GPAIX	CGFIX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.13	2.17	-0.04
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.68	0.05	+0.63
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.69	0.40	+0.28
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.72	0.90	-0.17

Drawdowns

GPAIX vs. CGFIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GPAIX drawdown since its inception was -17.16%, smaller than the maximum CGFIX drawdown of -20.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GPAIX and CGFIX.

Drawdown Indicators

	GPAIX	CGFIX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-17.16%	-20.28%	+3.12%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.01%	-2.78%	-3.23%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-6.59%	-7.09%	+0.50%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-9.13%	-20.28%	+11.15%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-17.16%	-20.28%	+3.12%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.11%	-1.64%	-0.47%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.20%	-3.19%	-1.01%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.11%	0.77%	+1.34%

Volatility

GPAIX vs. CGFIX - Volatility Comparison

Grant Park Multi Alternative Strategies Fund (GPAIX) has a higher volatility of 1.51% compared to abrdn Global Absolute Return Strategies Fund (CGFIX) at 1.11%. This indicates that GPAIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CGFIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	GPAIX	CGFIX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.51%	1.11%	+0.40%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	6.13%	2.33%	+3.80%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	7.83%	3.14%	+4.69%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	6.40%	5.76%	+0.64%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	7.16%	4.71%	+2.45%

GPAIX vs. CGFIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

GPAIX has a 1.43% expense ratio, which is higher than CGFIX's 0.78% expense ratio.

Dividends

GPAIX vs. CGFIX - Dividend Comparison

GPAIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.26%, less than CGFIX's 6.15% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CGFIX abrdn Global Absolute Return Strategies Fund	6.15%	5.51%	6.43%	2.08%	0.00%	7.49%	0.23%	3.29%	6.05%	0.33%	1.12%	0.35%
GPAIX Grant Park Multi Alternative Strategies Fund	3.26%	3.44%	2.01%	1.98%	2.71%	10.90%	1.78%	13.29%	1.51%	1.68%	1.92%	1.49%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both GPAIX and CGFIX in my portfolio?

GPAIX and CGFIX have a correlation of 0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, GPAIX or CGFIX?

GPAIX has higher volatility (1.51%) compared to CGFIX (1.11%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GPAIX dropped -17.16% vs CGFIX's -20.28%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

CGFIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.17 vs 2.13), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.