PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GOVD.L vs. HLQD.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GOVD.L vs. HLQD.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Lyxor Core Global Government Bond (DR) UCITS ETF - Dist (GOVD.L) and iShares $ Corp Bond Interest Rate Hedged UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (HLQD.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

GOVD.L is traded in GBP, while HLQD.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the HLQD.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GOVD.L achieves a -1.87% return, which is significantly lower than HLQD.L's 2.39% return.


GOVD.L

1D
0.35%
1M
-1.70%
6M
-1.87%
YTD
-1.87%
1Y
-0.59%
3Y*
0.01%
5Y*
-2.96%
10Y*

HLQD.L

1D
0.17%
1M
-1.23%
6M
1.37%
YTD
2.39%
1Y
4.45%
3Y*
6.30%
5Y*
5.89%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GOVD.L vs. HLQD.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
GOVD.L
Lyxor Core Global Government Bond (DR) UCITS ETF - Dist
-1.87%-0.20%-1.78%-1.14%-8.48%-5.98%-22.93%
HLQD.L
iShares $ Corp Bond Interest Rate Hedged UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
2.39%-2.05%10.04%5.59%12.35%2.21%-3.31%

Correlation

The correlation between GOVD.L and HLQD.L is 0.27, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.27

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.26

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.27

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 24, 2020

0.32

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GOVD.L vs. HLQD.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GOVD.L
GOVD.L Risk / Return Rank: 2525
Overall Rank
GOVD.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1010
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GOVD.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 2727
Sortino Ratio Rank
GOVD.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
GOVD.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 1010
Calmar Ratio Rank
GOVD.L Martin Ratio Rank: 1010
Martin Ratio Rank

HLQD.L
HLQD.L Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
HLQD.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HLQD.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
HLQD.L Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
HLQD.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
HLQD.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GOVD.L vs. HLQD.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lyxor Core Global Government Bond (DR) UCITS ETF - Dist (GOVD.L) and iShares $ Corp Bond Interest Rate Hedged UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (HLQD.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


GOVD.LHLQD.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.64

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.26

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.11

+0.21

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.02

1.04

-1.07

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.03

2.83

-2.86

GOVD.L vs. HLQD.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GOVD.L Sharpe Ratio is -0.00, which is lower than the HLQD.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.63. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GOVD.L and HLQD.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

GOVD.L vs. HLQD.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GOVD.L drawdown since its inception was -38.07%, which is greater than HLQD.L's maximum drawdown of -15.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GOVD.L and HLQD.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GOVD.LHLQD.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-38.07%

-15.87%

-22.20%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-27.55%

-4.24%

-23.31%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.55%

-9.92%

-17.63%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.55%

-11.10%

-16.45%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-36.93%

-2.62%

-34.31%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-32.01%

-4.62%

-27.39%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

23.11%

1.56%

+21.55%

Volatility

GOVD.L vs. HLQD.L - Volatility Comparison

Lyxor Core Global Government Bond (DR) UCITS ETF - Dist (GOVD.L) has a higher volatility of 28.36% compared to iShares $ Corp Bond Interest Rate Hedged UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (HLQD.L) at 1.98%. This indicates that GOVD.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HLQD.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GOVD.LHLQD.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

28.36%

1.98%

+26.38%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

120.69%

5.28%

+115.41%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

149.55%

6.99%

+142.56%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

67.43%

8.76%

+58.67%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

61.78%

9.48%

+52.30%

GOVD.L vs. HLQD.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

GOVD.L has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than HLQD.L's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

GOVD.L vs. HLQD.L - Dividend Comparison

GOVD.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.73%, while HLQD.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020
GOVD.L
Lyxor Core Global Government Bond (DR) UCITS ETF - Dist
2.73%2.68%2.45%1.64%1.28%1.23%0.48%
HLQD.L
iShares $ Corp Bond Interest Rate Hedged UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


GOVD.L and HLQD.L have a correlation of 0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, GOVD.L is cheaper at 0.09% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

GOVD.L is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for HLQD.L.

GOVD.L is categorized as Global Bonds, while HLQD.L is USD Corporate Bond. GOVD.L tracks Bloomberg Global Aggregate TR USD, while HLQD.L tracks IBOXX US Dollar Liquid Investment Grade IR Hedged Index (USD). They also come from different issuers: Amundi and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for GOVD.L and 0.25% for HLQD.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GOVD.L and HLQD.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer