GOOX vs. FNGG

Last updated Jun 25, 2026

GOOX (T-Rex 2X Long Alphabet Daily Target ETF) and FNGG (Direxion Daily NYSE FANG+ Bull 2X Shares) are both exchange-traded funds - GOOX is a Leveraged Bonds fund actively managed by T-Rex, while FNGG is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the NYSE FANG+ Index (2x Leveraged). GOOX is actively managed, while FNGG is passively managed. Over the past year, GOOX returned 249.43% vs 19.06% for FNGG. A 0.60 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. GOOX charges 1.05%/yr vs 0.97%/yr for FNGG.

Performance

GOOX vs. FNGG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T-Rex 2X Long Alphabet Daily Target ETF (GOOX) and Direxion Daily NYSE FANG+ Bull 2X Shares (FNGG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GOOX achieves a 9.99% return, which is significantly higher than FNGG's 3.51% return.

GOOX

• 1D: -0.62%
• 1M: -18.71%
• YTD: 9.99%
• 6M: 8.48%
• 1Y: 249.43%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

FNGG

• 1D: -2.31%
• 1M: -9.03%
• YTD: 3.51%
• 6M: 0.38%
• 1Y: 19.06%
• 3Y*: 47.04%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GOOX vs. FNGG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
GOOX T-Rex 2X Long Alphabet Daily Target ETF	9.99%	121.41%	44.31%
FNGG Direxion Daily NYSE FANG+ Bull 2X Shares	3.51%	27.21%	97.96%

Correlation

The correlation between GOOX and FNGG is 0.54, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.54
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 11, 2024	0.60

The correlation between GOOX and FNGG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.54 to 0.60 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

GOOX vs. FNGG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GOOX

GOOX Risk / Return Rank: 94
GOOX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 97
GOOX Sortino Ratio Rank: 95
GOOX Omega Ratio Rank: 92
GOOX Calmar Ratio Rank: 94
GOOX Martin Ratio Rank: 92

FNGG

FNGG Risk / Return Rank: 16
FNGG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 16
FNGG Sortino Ratio Rank: 17
FNGG Omega Ratio Rank: 17
FNGG Calmar Ratio Rank: 14
FNGG Martin Ratio Rank: 14

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GOOX vs. FNGG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T-Rex 2X Long Alphabet Daily Target ETF (GOOX) and Direxion Daily NYSE FANG+ Bull 2X Shares (FNGG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	GOOX	FNGG	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	4.30	0.44	+3.86
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	4.48	0.88	+3.60
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.54	1.11	+0.43
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	6.44	0.45	+6.00
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	20.39	1.14	+19.25

GOOX vs. FNGG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GOOX Sharpe Ratio is 4.30, which is higher than the FNGG Sharpe Ratio of 0.44. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GOOX and FNGG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

GOOX vs. FNGG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GOOX drawdown since its inception was -52.46%, smaller than the maximum FNGG drawdown of -91.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GOOX and FNGG.

Drawdown Indicators

	GOOX	FNGG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-52.46%	-91.33%	+38.87%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-38.98%	-43.01%	+4.03%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-47.03%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-26.90%	-23.44%	-3.46%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-17.09%	-55.54%	+38.45%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	12.29%	16.71%	-4.42%

Volatility

GOOX vs. FNGG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for T-Rex 2X Long Alphabet Daily Target ETF (GOOX) is 19.15%, while Direxion Daily NYSE FANG+ Bull 2X Shares (FNGG) has a volatility of 21.13%. This indicates that GOOX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FNGG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	GOOX	FNGG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	19.15%	21.13%	-1.98%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	41.59%	35.01%	+6.58%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	58.39%	43.66%	+14.73%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	60.53%	67.78%	-7.25%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	60.53%	67.78%	-7.25%

GOOX vs. FNGG - Expense Ratio Comparison

GOOX has a 1.05% expense ratio, which is higher than FNGG's 0.97% expense ratio.

Dividends

GOOX vs. FNGG - Dividend Comparison

GOOX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.28%, less than FNGG's 11.50% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
FNGG Direxion Daily NYSE FANG+ Bull 2X Shares	11.50%	11.89%	0.79%	0.88%	0.00%	4.99%
GOOX T-Rex 2X Long Alphabet Daily Target ETF	0.28%	0.30%	16.78%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both GOOX and FNGG in my portfolio?

GOOX and FNGG have a correlation of 0.54, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, GOOX or FNGG?

FNGG has higher volatility (21.13%) compared to GOOX (19.15%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GOOX dropped -52.46% vs FNGG's -91.33%.

Which ETF is better, GOOX or FNGG?

On 1-year performance, GOOX leads with 249.43% vs 19.06% for FNGG. On fees, FNGG is cheaper at 0.97% per year. On volatility, GOOX has been the lower-risk option at 19.15%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, GOOX or FNGG?

Over the 1-year period, GOOX has performed better with a 249.43% return vs 19.06%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, GOOX or FNGG?

FNGG is cheaper with a 0.97% expense ratio, compared with 1.05% for GOOX.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, GOOX or FNGG?

FNGG has the higher dividend yield at 11.50%, compared with 0.28% for GOOX.

What is the main difference between GOOX and FNGG?

GOOX is categorized as Leveraged Bonds, while FNGG is Leveraged Equities. They also come from different issuers: T-Rex and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 1.05% for GOOX and 0.97% for FNGG.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

GOOX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.30 vs 0.44), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.