GOOX vs. FNGG
GOOX (T-Rex 2X Long Alphabet Daily Target ETF) and FNGG (Direxion Daily NYSE FANG+ Bull 2X Shares) are both exchange-traded funds - GOOX is a Leveraged Bonds fund actively managed by T-Rex, while FNGG is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the NYSE FANG+ Index (2x Leveraged). GOOX is actively managed, while FNGG is passively managed. Over the past year, GOOX returned 274.80% vs 55.32% for FNGG. A 0.61 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. GOOX charges 1.05%/yr vs 0.98%/yr for FNGG.
Performance
GOOX vs. FNGG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GOOX achieves a 18.83% return, which is significantly lower than FNGG's 28.89% return.
GOOX
- 1D
- -1.31%
- 1M
- -13.31%
- YTD
- 18.83%
- 6M
- 12.03%
- 1Y
- 274.80%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FNGG
- 1D
- -2.33%
- 1M
- 23.02%
- YTD
- 28.89%
- 6M
- 17.02%
- 1Y
- 55.32%
- 3Y*
- 62.01%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GOOX vs. FNGG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
GOOX T-Rex 2X Long Alphabet Daily Target ETF | 18.83% | 121.41% | 46.80% |
FNGG Direxion Daily NYSE FANG+ Bull 2X Shares | 28.89% | 27.21% | 96.62% |
Correlation
The correlation between GOOX and FNGG is 0.54, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.54 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 12, 2024 | 0.61 |
The correlation between GOOX and FNGG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.54 to 0.61 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GOOX vs. FNGG — Risk / Return Rank
GOOX
FNGG
GOOX vs. FNGG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T-Rex 2X Long Alphabet Daily Target ETF (GOOX) and Direxion Daily NYSE FANG+ Bull 2X Shares (FNGG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GOOX | FNGG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +3.42 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.96 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.58 | 1.24 | +0.34 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 7.10 | 1.29 | +5.81 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 24.06 | 3.42 | +20.65 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GOOX | FNGG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.83 | 1.40 | +3.42 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.27 | 0.07 | +1.20 |
Drawdowns
GOOX vs. FNGG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GOOX drawdown since its inception was -52.46%, smaller than the maximum FNGG drawdown of -91.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GOOX and FNGG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GOOX | FNGG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -52.46% | -91.33% | +38.87% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -38.98% | -43.01% | +4.03% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -47.03% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -21.02% | -4.67% | -16.35% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -17.04% | -56.04% | +39.00% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 11.48% | 16.25% | -4.77% |
Volatility
GOOX vs. FNGG - Volatility Comparison
T-Rex 2X Long Alphabet Daily Target ETF (GOOX) has a higher volatility of 16.21% compared to Direxion Daily NYSE FANG+ Bull 2X Shares (FNGG) at 11.39%. This indicates that GOOX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FNGG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GOOX | FNGG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 16.21% | 11.39% | +4.82% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 40.03% | 30.55% | +9.48% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 57.42% | 39.61% | +17.81% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 60.37% | 67.64% | -7.27% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 60.37% | 67.64% | -7.27% |
GOOX vs. FNGG - Expense Ratio Comparison
GOOX has a 1.05% expense ratio, which is higher than FNGG's 0.98% expense ratio.
Dividends
GOOX vs. FNGG - Dividend Comparison
GOOX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.26%, less than FNGG's 9.20% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FNGG Direxion Daily NYSE FANG+ Bull 2X Shares | 9.20% | 11.89% | 0.79% | 0.88% | 0.00% | 4.99% |
GOOX T-Rex 2X Long Alphabet Daily Target ETF | 0.26% | 0.30% | 16.78% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GOOX and FNGG have a correlation of 0.54, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GOOX has higher volatility (16.21%) compared to FNGG (11.39%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GOOX dropped -52.46% vs FNGG's -91.33%.
On 1-year performance, GOOX leads with 274.80% vs 55.32% for FNGG. On fees, FNGG is cheaper at 0.98% per year. On volatility, FNGG has been the lower-risk option at 11.39%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, GOOX has performed better with a 274.80% return vs 55.32%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
FNGG is cheaper with a 0.98% expense ratio, compared with 1.05% for GOOX.
FNGG has the higher dividend yield at 9.20%, compared with 0.26% for GOOX.
GOOX is categorized as Leveraged Bonds, while FNGG is Leveraged Equities. They also come from different issuers: T-Rex and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 1.05% for GOOX and 0.98% for FNGG.
GOOX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.83 vs 1.40), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GOOX and FNGG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer