GOOX vs. BTCZ
GOOX (T-Rex 2X Long Alphabet Daily Target ETF) and BTCZ (T-Rex 2X Inverse Bitcoin Daily Target ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - GOOX is a Leveraged Bonds fund actively managed by T-Rex, while BTCZ is a Cryptocurrency fund actively managed by T-Rex. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, GOOX returned 274.80% vs 55.67% for BTCZ. At a correlation of -0.31, they often move in opposite directions. GOOX charges 1.05%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for BTCZ.
Performance
GOOX vs. BTCZ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GOOX achieves a 18.83% return, which is significantly lower than BTCZ's 32.54% return.
GOOX
- 1D
- -1.31%
- 1M
- -13.31%
- YTD
- 18.83%
- 6M
- 12.03%
- 1Y
- 274.80%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BTCZ
- 1D
- 5.28%
- 1M
- 46.26%
- YTD
- 32.54%
- 6M
- 46.67%
- 1Y
- 55.67%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GOOX vs. BTCZ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
GOOX T-Rex 2X Long Alphabet Daily Target ETF | 18.83% | 121.41% | -10.49% |
BTCZ T-Rex 2X Inverse Bitcoin Daily Target ETF | 32.54% | -29.11% | -76.58% |
Correlation
The correlation between GOOX and BTCZ is -0.28, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.28 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 11, 2024 | -0.31 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GOOX vs. BTCZ — Risk / Return Rank
GOOX
BTCZ
GOOX vs. BTCZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T-Rex 2X Long Alphabet Daily Target ETF (GOOX) and T-Rex 2X Inverse Bitcoin Daily Target ETF (BTCZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GOOX | BTCZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +4.19 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +3.49 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.58 | 1.17 | +0.41 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 7.10 | 1.14 | +5.96 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 24.06 | 2.17 | +21.89 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GOOX | BTCZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.83 | 0.64 | +4.19 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.27 | -0.57 | +1.84 |
Drawdowns
GOOX vs. BTCZ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GOOX drawdown since its inception was -52.46%, smaller than the maximum BTCZ drawdown of -91.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GOOX and BTCZ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GOOX | BTCZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -52.46% | -91.06% | +38.60% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -38.98% | -49.02% | +10.04% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -21.02% | -78.63% | +57.61% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -17.04% | -73.72% | +56.68% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 11.48% | 25.74% | -14.26% |
Volatility
GOOX vs. BTCZ - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for T-Rex 2X Long Alphabet Daily Target ETF (GOOX) is 16.21%, while T-Rex 2X Inverse Bitcoin Daily Target ETF (BTCZ) has a volatility of 17.94%. This indicates that GOOX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BTCZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GOOX | BTCZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 16.21% | 17.94% | -1.73% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 40.03% | 68.50% | -28.47% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 57.42% | 87.46% | -30.04% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 60.37% | 97.12% | -36.75% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 60.37% | 97.12% | -36.75% |
GOOX vs. BTCZ - Expense Ratio Comparison
GOOX has a 1.05% expense ratio, which is higher than BTCZ's 0.95% expense ratio.
Dividends
GOOX vs. BTCZ - Dividend Comparison
GOOX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.26%, more than BTCZ's 0.01% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
BTCZ T-Rex 2X Inverse Bitcoin Daily Target ETF | 0.01% | 0.02% | 0.08% |
GOOX T-Rex 2X Long Alphabet Daily Target ETF | 0.26% | 0.30% | 16.78% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GOOX and BTCZ have a correlation of -0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BTCZ has higher volatility (17.94%) compared to GOOX (16.21%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GOOX dropped -52.46% vs BTCZ's -91.06%.
On 1-year performance, GOOX leads with 274.80% vs 55.67% for BTCZ. On fees, BTCZ is cheaper at 0.95% per year. On volatility, GOOX has been the lower-risk option at 16.21%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, GOOX has performed better with a 274.80% return vs 55.67%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
BTCZ is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 1.05% for GOOX.
GOOX has the higher dividend yield at 0.26%, compared with 0.01% for BTCZ.
GOOX is categorized as Leveraged Bonds, while BTCZ is Cryptocurrency. Their fees differ too: 1.05% for GOOX and 0.95% for BTCZ.
GOOX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.83 vs 0.64), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GOOX and BTCZ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer