PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GOOX vs. BTCZ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GOOX vs. BTCZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T-Rex 2X Long Alphabet Daily Target ETF (GOOX) and T-Rex 2X Inverse Bitcoin Daily Target ETF (BTCZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GOOX achieves a 18.83% return, which is significantly lower than BTCZ's 32.54% return.


GOOX

1D
-1.31%
1M
-13.31%
YTD
18.83%
6M
12.03%
1Y
274.80%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

BTCZ

1D
5.28%
1M
46.26%
YTD
32.54%
6M
46.67%
1Y
55.67%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GOOX vs. BTCZ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
GOOX
T-Rex 2X Long Alphabet Daily Target ETF
18.83%121.41%-10.49%
BTCZ
T-Rex 2X Inverse Bitcoin Daily Target ETF
32.54%-29.11%-76.58%

Correlation

The correlation between GOOX and BTCZ is -0.28, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.28

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 11, 2024

-0.31

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GOOX vs. BTCZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GOOX
GOOX Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
GOOX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GOOX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
GOOX Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
GOOX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
GOOX Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank

BTCZ
BTCZ Risk / Return Rank: 2323
Overall Rank
BTCZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1919
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BTCZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 2626
Sortino Ratio Rank
BTCZ Omega Ratio Rank: 2525
Omega Ratio Rank
BTCZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 2525
Calmar Ratio Rank
BTCZ Martin Ratio Rank: 1919
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GOOX vs. BTCZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T-Rex 2X Long Alphabet Daily Target ETF (GOOX) and T-Rex 2X Inverse Bitcoin Daily Target ETF (BTCZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GOOXBTCZDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+4.19

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+3.49

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.58

1.17

+0.41

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

7.10

1.14

+5.96

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

24.06

2.17

+21.89

GOOX vs. BTCZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GOOX Sharpe Ratio is 4.83, which is higher than the BTCZ Sharpe Ratio of 0.64. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GOOX and BTCZ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GOOXBTCZDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.83

0.64

+4.19

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.27

-0.57

+1.84

Drawdowns

GOOX vs. BTCZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GOOX drawdown since its inception was -52.46%, smaller than the maximum BTCZ drawdown of -91.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GOOX and BTCZ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GOOXBTCZDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-52.46%

-91.06%

+38.60%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-38.98%

-49.02%

+10.04%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-21.02%

-78.63%

+57.61%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-17.04%

-73.72%

+56.68%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

11.48%

25.74%

-14.26%

Volatility

GOOX vs. BTCZ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for T-Rex 2X Long Alphabet Daily Target ETF (GOOX) is 16.21%, while T-Rex 2X Inverse Bitcoin Daily Target ETF (BTCZ) has a volatility of 17.94%. This indicates that GOOX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BTCZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GOOXBTCZDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

16.21%

17.94%

-1.73%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

40.03%

68.50%

-28.47%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

57.42%

87.46%

-30.04%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

60.37%

97.12%

-36.75%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

60.37%

97.12%

-36.75%

GOOX vs. BTCZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

GOOX has a 1.05% expense ratio, which is higher than BTCZ's 0.95% expense ratio.


Dividends

GOOX vs. BTCZ - Dividend Comparison

GOOX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.26%, more than BTCZ's 0.01% yield.


PositionTTM20252024
BTCZ
T-Rex 2X Inverse Bitcoin Daily Target ETF
0.01%0.02%0.08%
GOOX
T-Rex 2X Long Alphabet Daily Target ETF
0.26%0.30%16.78%

Frequently Asked Questions


GOOX and BTCZ have a correlation of -0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BTCZ has higher volatility (17.94%) compared to GOOX (16.21%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GOOX dropped -52.46% vs BTCZ's -91.06%.

On 1-year performance, GOOX leads with 274.80% vs 55.67% for BTCZ. On fees, BTCZ is cheaper at 0.95% per year. On volatility, GOOX has been the lower-risk option at 16.21%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, GOOX has performed better with a 274.80% return vs 55.67%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

BTCZ is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 1.05% for GOOX.

GOOX has the higher dividend yield at 0.26%, compared with 0.01% for BTCZ.

GOOX is categorized as Leveraged Bonds, while BTCZ is Cryptocurrency. Their fees differ too: 1.05% for GOOX and 0.95% for BTCZ.

GOOX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.83 vs 0.64), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GOOX and BTCZ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer