PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GOOI.L vs. AMZI.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

GOOI.L vs. AMZI.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in IncomeShares Alphabet (GOOG) Options ETP (GOOI.L) and IncomeShares Amazon (AMZN) Options ETP (AMZI.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

GOOI.L vs. AMZI.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
GOOI.L
IncomeShares Alphabet (GOOG) Options ETP
-10.17%45.15%17.03%
AMZI.L
IncomeShares Amazon (AMZN) Options ETP
-19.85%4.42%15.12%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GOOI.L achieves a -10.17% return, which is significantly higher than AMZI.L's -19.85% return.


GOOI.L

1D
2.23%
1M
-7.10%
YTD
-10.17%
6M
4.47%
1Y
57.75%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

AMZI.L

1D
1.21%
1M
-4.76%
YTD
-19.85%
6M
-17.88%
1Y
-3.91%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


GOOI.L vs. AMZI.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both GOOI.L and AMZI.L have an expense ratio of 0.55%.


Return for Risk

GOOI.L vs. AMZI.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GOOI.L
GOOI.L Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
GOOI.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GOOI.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
GOOI.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
GOOI.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
GOOI.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank

AMZI.L
AMZI.L Risk / Return Rank: 99
Overall Rank
AMZI.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AMZI.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 1010
Sortino Ratio Rank
AMZI.L Omega Ratio Rank: 1010
Omega Ratio Rank
AMZI.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
Calmar Ratio Rank
AMZI.L Martin Ratio Rank: 77
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GOOI.L vs. AMZI.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for IncomeShares Alphabet (GOOG) Options ETP (GOOI.L) and IncomeShares Amazon (AMZN) Options ETP (AMZI.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GOOI.LAMZI.LDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.18

-0.13

+2.31

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.93

0.03

+2.91

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.00

+0.35

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.90

-0.24

+3.14

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

10.45

-0.62

+11.07

GOOI.L vs. AMZI.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GOOI.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.18, which is higher than the AMZI.L Sharpe Ratio of -0.13. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GOOI.L and AMZI.L, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GOOI.LAMZI.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.18

-0.13

+2.31

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.24

-0.08

+1.32

Correlation

The correlation between GOOI.L and AMZI.L is 0.50, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

GOOI.L vs. AMZI.L - Dividend Comparison

GOOI.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 16.08%, more than AMZI.L's 15.58% yield.


TTM20252024
GOOI.L
IncomeShares Alphabet (GOOG) Options ETP
16.08%11.19%2.00%
AMZI.L
IncomeShares Amazon (AMZN) Options ETP
15.58%13.65%2.45%

Drawdowns

GOOI.L vs. AMZI.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GOOI.L drawdown since its inception was -26.69%, roughly equal to the maximum AMZI.L drawdown of -27.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GOOI.L and AMZI.L.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


GOOI.LAMZI.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-26.69%

-27.38%

+0.69%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-18.33%

-27.38%

+9.05%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-16.50%

-25.36%

+8.86%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.55%

-8.54%

+1.99%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.08%

10.64%

-5.56%

Volatility

GOOI.L vs. AMZI.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for IncomeShares Alphabet (GOOG) Options ETP (GOOI.L) is 6.47%, while IncomeShares Amazon (AMZN) Options ETP (AMZI.L) has a volatility of 8.38%. This indicates that GOOI.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AMZI.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


GOOI.LAMZI.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.47%

8.38%

-1.91%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.38%

22.36%

-5.98%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

26.47%

30.22%

-3.75%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

26.06%

29.10%

-3.04%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

26.06%

29.10%

-3.04%