PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GOOG.NEO vs. GOOGL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

GOOG.NEO vs. GOOGL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Alphabet Inc CDR (GOOG.NEO) and Alphabet Inc. Class A (GOOGL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

GOOG.NEO is traded in CAD, while GOOGL is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the GOOGL values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GOOG.NEO achieves a 15.34% return, which is significantly lower than GOOGL's 19.68% return.


GOOG.NEO

1D
-0.98%
1M
-7.64%
YTD
15.34%
6M
12.28%
1Y
110.61%
3Y*
39.55%
5Y*
10Y*

GOOGL

1D
-0.78%
1M
-5.35%
YTD
19.68%
6M
15.89%
1Y
124.10%
3Y*
44.78%
5Y*
29.09%
10Y*
27.24%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GOOG.NEO vs. GOOGL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
GOOG.NEO
Alphabet Inc CDR
15.34%61.20%33.56%56.62%-39.75%4.65%
GOOGL
Alphabet Inc. Class A
19.68%58.38%47.69%54.84%-34.75%7.50%

Correlation

The correlation between GOOG.NEO and GOOGL is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.93

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.94

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 12, 2021

0.92

The correlation between GOOG.NEO and GOOGL has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

GOOG.NEO:

CA$707.71B

GOOGL:

$4.51T

EPS

GOOG.NEO:

CA$10.28

GOOGL:

$13.11

PE Ratio

GOOG.NEO:

5.70

GOOGL:

28.10

PS Ratio

GOOG.NEO:

1.84

GOOGL:

10.65

PB Ratio

GOOG.NEO:

1.83

GOOGL:

9.42

Total Revenue (TTM)

GOOG.NEO:

CA$385.48B

GOOGL:

$422.57B

Gross Profit (TTM)

GOOG.NEO:

CA$228.10B

GOOGL:

$255.12B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GOOG.NEO vs. GOOGL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GOOG.NEO
GOOG.NEO Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
GOOG.NEO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GOOG.NEO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
GOOG.NEO Omega Ratio Rank: 9696
Omega Ratio Rank
GOOG.NEO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
GOOG.NEO Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank

GOOGL
GOOGL Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
GOOGL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GOOGL Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
GOOGL Omega Ratio Rank: 9696
Omega Ratio Rank
GOOGL Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
GOOGL Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GOOG.NEO vs. GOOGL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Alphabet Inc CDR (GOOG.NEO) and Alphabet Inc. Class A (GOOGL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GOOG.NEOGOOGLDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.47

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.41

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.61

1.69

-0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.27

6.58

-1.31

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

18.82

22.56

-3.74

GOOG.NEO vs. GOOGL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GOOG.NEO Sharpe Ratio is 3.84, which is comparable to the GOOGL Sharpe Ratio of 4.32. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GOOG.NEO and GOOGL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GOOG.NEOGOOGLDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.84

4.32

-0.47

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.97

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.98

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.65

0.95

-0.30

Drawdowns

GOOG.NEO vs. GOOGL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GOOG.NEO drawdown since its inception was -45.34%, which is greater than GOOGL's maximum drawdown of -39.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GOOG.NEO and GOOGL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GOOG.NEOGOOGLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-45.34%

-39.35%

-5.99%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-21.11%

-18.96%

-2.15%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-29.62%

-30.95%

+1.33%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-39.35%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.35%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-8.45%

-6.93%

-1.52%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-14.10%

-8.70%

-5.40%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.90%

5.52%

+0.38%

Volatility

GOOG.NEO vs. GOOGL - Volatility Comparison

Alphabet Inc CDR (GOOG.NEO) and Alphabet Inc. Class A (GOOGL) have volatilities of 8.57% and 8.60%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GOOG.NEOGOOGLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.57%

8.60%

-0.03%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

20.51%

20.20%

+0.31%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

28.94%

28.91%

+0.03%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

31.46%

30.05%

+1.41%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

31.46%

27.92%

+3.54%

Dividends

GOOG.NEO vs. GOOGL - Dividend Comparison

GOOG.NEO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.23%, which matches GOOGL's 0.23% yield.


PositionTTM20252024
GOOG.NEO
Alphabet Inc CDR
0.23%0.27%0.32%
GOOGL
Alphabet Inc. Class A
0.23%0.27%0.32%

Financials

GOOG.NEO vs. GOOGL - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Alphabet Inc CDR and Alphabet Inc. Class A. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


60.00B70.00B80.00B90.00B100.00B110.00B20222023202420252026
102.35B
109.90B
(GOOG.NEO) Total Revenue
(GOOGL) Total Revenue
Please note, different currencies. GOOG.NEO values in CAD, GOOGL values in USD

GOOG.NEO vs. GOOGL - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Alphabet Inc CDR and Alphabet Inc. Class A over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

54.0%56.0%58.0%60.0%62.0%20222023202420252026
59.6%
62.5%
Portfolio components
GOOG.NEO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Alphabet Inc CDR reported a gross profit of 60.98B and revenue of 102.35B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 59.6%.

GOOGL - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Alphabet Inc. Class A reported a gross profit of 68.63B and revenue of 109.90B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 62.5%.

GOOG.NEO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Alphabet Inc CDR reported an operating income of 31.23B and revenue of 102.35B, resulting in an operating margin of 30.5%.

GOOGL - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Alphabet Inc. Class A reported an operating income of 39.70B and revenue of 109.90B, resulting in an operating margin of 36.1%.

GOOG.NEO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Alphabet Inc CDR reported a net income of 34.98B and revenue of 102.35B, resulting in a net margin of 34.2%.

GOOGL - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Alphabet Inc. Class A reported a net income of 62.58B and revenue of 109.90B, resulting in a net margin of 56.9%.


Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.93, GOOG.NEO and GOOGL move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GOOG.NEO and GOOGL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer