PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GOODX vs. TCVIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GOODX vs. TCVIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GoodHaven Fund (GOODX) and Touchstone Mid Cap Value Fund (TCVIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GOODX achieves a -1.29% return, which is significantly lower than TCVIX's 14.59% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with GOODX having a 9.74% annualized return and TCVIX not far behind at 9.26%.


GOODX

1D
0.08%
1M
-0.84%
6M
-1.29%
YTD
-1.29%
1Y
2.05%
3Y*
12.10%
5Y*
10.75%
10Y*
9.74%

TCVIX

1D
-0.97%
1M
-0.36%
6M
14.59%
YTD
14.59%
1Y
21.25%
3Y*
12.65%
5Y*
7.68%
10Y*
9.26%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GOODX vs. TCVIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GOODX
GoodHaven Fund
-1.29%7.04%18.87%34.07%-11.51%35.97%6.32%19.03%-9.76%3.95%
TCVIX
Touchstone Mid Cap Value Fund
14.59%10.00%8.61%7.78%-8.38%27.12%5.70%29.76%-16.77%14.09%

Correlation

The correlation between GOODX and TCVIX is 0.76, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.76

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.81

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.85

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.83

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2012

0.80

The correlation between GOODX and TCVIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.76 to 0.85 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GOODX vs. TCVIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GOODX
GOODX Risk / Return Rank: 55
Overall Rank
GOODX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GOODX Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
Sortino Ratio Rank
GOODX Omega Ratio Rank: 55
Omega Ratio Rank
GOODX Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
Calmar Ratio Rank
GOODX Martin Ratio Rank: 55
Martin Ratio Rank

TCVIX
TCVIX Risk / Return Rank: 5353
Overall Rank
TCVIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TCVIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
TCVIX Omega Ratio Rank: 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
TCVIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
TCVIX Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GOODX vs. TCVIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GoodHaven Fund (GOODX) and Touchstone Mid Cap Value Fund (TCVIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


GOODXTCVIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.41

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.01

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.04

1.28

-0.24

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.22

2.56

-2.34

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.54

9.75

-9.21

GOODX vs. TCVIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GOODX Sharpe Ratio is 0.19, which is lower than the TCVIX Sharpe Ratio of 1.59. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GOODX and TCVIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

GOODX vs. TCVIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GOODX drawdown since its inception was -41.43%, roughly equal to the maximum TCVIX drawdown of -41.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GOODX and TCVIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GOODXTCVIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-41.43%

-41.89%

+0.46%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.71%

-8.52%

-2.19%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.27%

-18.98%

+2.71%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.74%

-19.37%

-0.37%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.58%

-41.89%

+3.31%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.43%

-1.47%

-2.96%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.23%

-5.37%

-3.86%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.44%

2.23%

+2.21%

Volatility

GOODX vs. TCVIX - Volatility Comparison

GoodHaven Fund (GOODX) has a higher volatility of 4.25% compared to Touchstone Mid Cap Value Fund (TCVIX) at 3.86%. This indicates that GOODX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TCVIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GOODXTCVIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.25%

3.86%

+0.39%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.13%

10.46%

-1.33%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.83%

13.71%

-0.88%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.20%

17.17%

-0.97%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.19%

19.08%

-1.89%

GOODX vs. TCVIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

GOODX has a 1.10% expense ratio, which is higher than TCVIX's 0.85% expense ratio.


Dividends

GOODX vs. TCVIX - Dividend Comparison

GOODX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.04%, less than TCVIX's 3.71% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GOODX
GoodHaven Fund
3.04%3.00%2.43%1.44%0.38%0.13%0.45%1.27%1.27%0.00%0.00%0.00%
TCVIX
Touchstone Mid Cap Value Fund
3.71%4.25%5.48%1.80%6.59%6.77%0.76%0.91%5.86%6.47%4.44%7.26%

Frequently Asked Questions


GOODX and TCVIX have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GOODX has higher volatility (4.25%) compared to TCVIX (3.86%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GOODX dropped -41.43% vs TCVIX's -41.89%.

TCVIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.59 vs 0.19), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GOODX and TCVIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer