GOODX vs. FMUEX
GOODX (GoodHaven Fund) and FMUEX (RBB Free Market U.S. Equity Fund) are both Mid Cap Value Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, GOODX returned 9.64%/yr vs 11.47%/yr for FMUEX. Their correlation of 0.83 means they have usually moved in the same direction. GOODX charges 1.10%/yr vs 0.78%/yr for FMUEX.
Performance
GOODX vs. FMUEX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GOODX achieves a -0.14% return, which is significantly lower than FMUEX's 19.89% return. Over the past 10 years, GOODX has underperformed FMUEX with an annualized return of 9.64%, while FMUEX has yielded a comparatively higher 11.47% annualized return.
GOODX
- 1D
- -0.21%
- 1M
- 0.27%
- 6M
- 0.12%
- YTD
- -0.14%
- 1Y
- 4.82%
- 3Y*
- 10.57%
- 5Y*
- 11.01%
- 10Y*
- 9.64%
- ALL TIME*
- 7.94%
FMUEX
- 1D
- 0.79%
- 1M
- 0.86%
- 6M
- 13.96%
- YTD
- 19.89%
- 1Y
- 34.72%
- 3Y*
- 15.18%
- 5Y*
- 10.50%
- 10Y*
- 11.47%
- ALL TIME*
- 9.86%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 | |
GOODX GoodHaven Fund | $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 |
GOODX vs. FMUEX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GOODX GoodHaven Fund | -0.14% | 7.04% | 18.87% | 34.07% | -11.51% | 35.97% | 6.32% | 19.03% | -9.76% | 3.95% |
FMUEX RBB Free Market U.S. Equity Fund | 19.89% | 12.79% | 8.09% | 17.10% | -10.47% | 31.75% | 5.65% | 22.44% | -11.62% | 13.44% |
Correlation
The correlation between GOODX and FMUEX is 0.81, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.81 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.87 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.90 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.85 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2012 | 0.83 |
The correlation between GOODX and FMUEX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.81 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GOODX vs. FMUEX — Risk / Return Rank
GOODX
FMUEX
GOODX vs. FMUEX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GoodHaven Fund (GOODX) and RBB Free Market U.S. Equity Fund (FMUEX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GOODX | FMUEX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.02 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.80 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.04 | 1.40 | -0.35 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.23 | 4.12 | -3.89 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.55 | 15.49 | -14.94 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GOODX vs. FMUEX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GOODX drawdown since its inception was -41.43%, smaller than the maximum FMUEX drawdown of -58.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GOODX and FMUEX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GOODX | FMUEX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -41.43% | -58.03% | +16.60% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.71% | -7.61% | -3.10% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.27% | -25.49% | +9.22% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.74% | -25.49% | +5.75% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -38.58% | -42.31% | +3.73% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.31% | -0.50% | -2.81% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.20% | -8.00% | -1.20% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.55% | 2.03% | +2.52% |
Volatility
GOODX vs. FMUEX - Volatility Comparison
GoodHaven Fund (GOODX) has a higher volatility of 3.13% compared to RBB Free Market U.S. Equity Fund (FMUEX) at 2.93%. This indicates that GOODX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FMUEX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GOODX | FMUEX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.13% | 2.93% | +0.20% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.89% | 9.89% | -1.00% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.72% | 14.19% | -1.47% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.14% | 18.28% | -2.14% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.18% | 19.66% | -2.48% |
GOODX vs. FMUEX - Expense Ratio Comparison
GOODX has a 1.10% expense ratio, which is higher than FMUEX's 0.78% expense ratio.
Dividends
GOODX vs. FMUEX - Dividend Comparison
GOODX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.00%, more than FMUEX's 1.56% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FMUEX RBB Free Market U.S. Equity Fund | 1.56% | 1.87% | 0.00% | 4.12% | 8.26% | 4.38% | 1.61% | 5.57% | 5.88% | 3.80% | 4.80% | 8.51% |
GOODX GoodHaven Fund | 3.00% | 3.00% | 2.43% | 1.44% | 0.38% | 0.13% | 0.45% | 1.27% | 1.27% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GOODX and FMUEX have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GOODX has higher volatility (3.13%) compared to FMUEX (2.93%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GOODX dropped -41.43% vs FMUEX's -58.03%.
FMUEX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.21 vs 0.20), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GOODX and FMUEX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer