GOLD.AS vs. XUSE.AS
GOLD.AS (Amundi Physical Gold ETC C) and XUSE.AS (iShares MSCI World ex-USA UCITS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - GOLD.AS is a Precious Metals fund tracking the LMBA Gold Price PM USD, while XUSE.AS is a Global Equities fund tracking the MSCI World ex USA Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, GOLD.AS returned 19.46% vs 21.54% for XUSE.AS. At a 0.40 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. GOLD.AS charges 0.12%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for XUSE.AS.
Performance
GOLD.AS vs. XUSE.AS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GOLD.AS achieves a -7.09% return, which is significantly lower than XUSE.AS's 8.64% return.
GOLD.AS
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -3.39%
- 6M
- -14.19%
- YTD
- -7.09%
- 1Y
- 19.46%
- 3Y*
- 26.76%
- 5Y*
- 17.17%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 17.09%
XUSE.AS
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -0.44%
- 6M
- 6.39%
- YTD
- 8.64%
- 1Y
- 21.54%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 24.36%
GOLD.AS vs. XUSE.AS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
GOLD.AS Amundi Physical Gold ETC C | -7.09% | 54.31% |
XUSE.AS iShares MSCI World ex-USA UCITS ETF | 8.64% | 26.67% |
Correlation
The correlation between GOLD.AS and XUSE.AS is 0.52, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.52 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 31, 2025 | 0.40 |
The correlation between GOLD.AS and XUSE.AS shifts across timeframes, from 0.40 (all time) to 0.52 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GOLD.AS vs. XUSE.AS — Risk / Return Rank
GOLD.AS
XUSE.AS
GOLD.AS vs. XUSE.AS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi Physical Gold ETC C (GOLD.AS) and iShares MSCI World ex-USA UCITS ETF (XUSE.AS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GOLD.AS | XUSE.AS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.69 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.07 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.15 | 1.26 | -0.11 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.79 | 2.02 | -1.23 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.87 | 7.26 | -5.39 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GOLD.AS vs. XUSE.AS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GOLD.AS drawdown since its inception was -24.41%, which is greater than XUSE.AS's maximum drawdown of -12.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GOLD.AS and XUSE.AS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GOLD.AS | XUSE.AS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -24.41% | -12.97% | -11.44% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -24.41% | -10.54% | -13.87% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -24.41% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.41% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -24.36% | -1.72% | -22.64% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.57% | -1.70% | -4.87% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 10.35% | 2.95% | +7.40% |
Volatility
GOLD.AS vs. XUSE.AS - Volatility Comparison
Amundi Physical Gold ETC C (GOLD.AS) has a higher volatility of 6.72% compared to iShares MSCI World ex-USA UCITS ETF (XUSE.AS) at 3.87%. This indicates that GOLD.AS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XUSE.AS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GOLD.AS | XUSE.AS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.72% | 3.87% | +2.85% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 23.20% | 12.97% | +10.23% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 26.64% | 15.08% | +11.56% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.68% | 16.28% | +1.40% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.28% | 16.28% | +1.00% |
GOLD.AS vs. XUSE.AS - Expense Ratio Comparison
GOLD.AS has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than XUSE.AS's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
GOLD.AS vs. XUSE.AS - Dividend Comparison
Neither GOLD.AS nor XUSE.AS has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
GOLD.AS and XUSE.AS have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, GOLD.AS is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
GOLD.AS is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for XUSE.AS.
GOLD.AS is categorized as Precious Metals, while XUSE.AS is Global Equities. GOLD.AS tracks LMBA Gold Price PM USD, while XUSE.AS tracks MSCI World ex USA Index. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for GOLD.AS and 0.25% for XUSE.AS.
Find the right allocation for GOLD.AS and XUSE.AS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer