PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GOLD.AS vs. VWRL.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GOLD.AS vs. VWRL.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Amundi Physical Gold ETC C (GOLD.AS) and Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF Distributing (VWRL.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

GOLD.AS is traded in USD, while VWRL.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the VWRL.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GOLD.AS achieves a 2.90% return, which is significantly lower than VWRL.L's 11.67% return.


GOLD.AS

1D
-1.46%
1M
-2.12%
YTD
2.90%
6M
5.08%
1Y
32.45%
3Y*
31.11%
5Y*
18.45%
10Y*

VWRL.L

1D
-0.69%
1M
4.75%
YTD
11.67%
6M
13.11%
1Y
29.36%
3Y*
21.19%
5Y*
11.28%
10Y*
12.76%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GOLD.AS vs. VWRL.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
GOLD.AS
Amundi Physical Gold ETC C
2.90%64.94%26.36%13.35%-0.13%-4.09%24.31%18.40%
VWRL.L
Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF Distributing
11.67%22.59%17.60%21.71%-18.23%18.95%15.57%14.66%

Correlation

The correlation between GOLD.AS and VWRL.L is 0.30, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.30

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.23

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.20

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 24, 2019

0.15

The correlation between GOLD.AS and VWRL.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.15 (all time) to 0.30 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GOLD.AS vs. VWRL.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GOLD.AS
GOLD.AS Risk / Return Rank: 3434
Overall Rank
GOLD.AS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3535
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GOLD.AS Sortino Ratio Rank: 3131
Sortino Ratio Rank
GOLD.AS Omega Ratio Rank: 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
GOLD.AS Calmar Ratio Rank: 3636
Calmar Ratio Rank
GOLD.AS Martin Ratio Rank: 3232
Martin Ratio Rank

VWRL.L
VWRL.L Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
VWRL.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VWRL.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
VWRL.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
VWRL.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
VWRL.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GOLD.AS vs. VWRL.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi Physical Gold ETC C (GOLD.AS) and Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF Distributing (VWRL.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GOLD.ASVWRL.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.21

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.94

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.45

-0.21

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.80

3.21

-1.41

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.78

14.02

-9.25

GOLD.AS vs. VWRL.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GOLD.AS Sharpe Ratio is 1.28, which is lower than the VWRL.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.49. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GOLD.AS and VWRL.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GOLD.ASVWRL.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.28

2.49

-1.21

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.05

0.75

+0.30

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.82

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.11

0.81

+0.30

Drawdowns

GOLD.AS vs. VWRL.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GOLD.AS drawdown since its inception was -21.14%, smaller than the maximum VWRL.L drawdown of -33.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GOLD.AS and VWRL.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GOLD.ASVWRL.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-21.14%

-33.11%

+11.97%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-17.83%

-9.11%

-8.72%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.83%

-16.28%

-1.55%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.14%

-26.74%

+5.60%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.11%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-16.22%

-0.69%

-15.53%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.29%

-4.52%

-1.77%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.74%

2.09%

+4.65%

Volatility

GOLD.AS vs. VWRL.L - Volatility Comparison

Amundi Physical Gold ETC C (GOLD.AS) has a higher volatility of 6.67% compared to Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF Distributing (VWRL.L) at 3.38%. This indicates that GOLD.AS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VWRL.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GOLD.ASVWRL.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.67%

3.38%

+3.29%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

22.08%

9.08%

+13.00%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

25.04%

11.75%

+13.29%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.27%

15.06%

+2.21%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.02%

15.55%

+1.47%

GOLD.AS vs. VWRL.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

GOLD.AS has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than VWRL.L's 0.22% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

GOLD.AS vs. VWRL.L - Dividend Comparison

GOLD.AS has not paid dividends to shareholders, while VWRL.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.24%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GOLD.AS
Amundi Physical Gold ETC C
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VWRL.L
Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF Distributing
1.24%1.39%1.49%1.72%2.03%1.45%1.58%1.95%2.22%1.90%1.85%2.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


GOLD.AS and VWRL.L have a correlation of 0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, GOLD.AS is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

GOLD.AS is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.22% for VWRL.L.

GOLD.AS is categorized as Precious Metals, while VWRL.L is Global Equities. GOLD.AS tracks LMBA Gold Price PM USD, while VWRL.L tracks MSCI ACWI NR USD. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for GOLD.AS and 0.22% for VWRL.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GOLD.AS and VWRL.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer