GOIIX vs. CRAZX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

GOIIX (Goldman Sachs Growth and Income Strategy Portfolio) and CRAZX (Columbia Adaptive Risk Allocation Fund) are both Tactical Allocation funds. Over the past 10 years, GOIIX returned 8.75%/yr vs 7.20%/yr for CRAZX. Their correlation of 0.80 suggests significant overlap in exposure. GOIIX charges 0.19%/yr vs 0.74%/yr for CRAZX.

Performance

GOIIX vs. CRAZX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Goldman Sachs Growth and Income Strategy Portfolio (GOIIX) and Columbia Adaptive Risk Allocation Fund (CRAZX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GOIIX achieves a 7.78% return, which is significantly lower than CRAZX's 9.92% return. Over the past 10 years, GOIIX has outperformed CRAZX with an annualized return of 8.75%, while CRAZX has yielded a comparatively lower 7.20% annualized return.

GOIIX

• 1D: 0.23%
• 1M: 3.82%
• YTD: 7.78%
• 6M: 8.46%
• 1Y: 20.18%
• 3Y*: 15.41%
• 5Y*: 7.66%
• 10Y*: 8.75%

CRAZX

• 1D: 0.34%
• 1M: 2.46%
• YTD: 9.92%
• 6M: 9.69%
• 1Y: 21.35%
• 3Y*: 12.90%
• 5Y*: 5.83%
• 10Y*: 7.20%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GOIIX vs. CRAZX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
GOIIX Goldman Sachs Growth and Income Strategy Portfolio	7.78%	15.03%	14.81%	15.16%	-15.86%	12.65%	12.73%	19.16%	-8.63%	16.60%
CRAZX Columbia Adaptive Risk Allocation Fund	9.92%	14.35%	7.85%	8.84%	-15.03%	11.20%	9.44%	18.93%	-4.52%	13.26%

Correlation

The correlation between GOIIX and CRAZX is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.93
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.91
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.83
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.84
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 20, 2012	0.80

The correlation between GOIIX and CRAZX shifts across timeframes, from 0.80 (all time) to 0.93 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

GOIIX vs. CRAZX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GOIIX

GOIIX Risk / Return Rank: 63
GOIIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 65
GOIIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 63
GOIIX Omega Ratio Rank: 63
GOIIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 56
GOIIX Martin Ratio Rank: 65

CRAZX

CRAZX Risk / Return Rank: 87
CRAZX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
CRAZX Sortino Ratio Rank: 86
CRAZX Omega Ratio Rank: 82
CRAZX Calmar Ratio Rank: 87
CRAZX Martin Ratio Rank: 91

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GOIIX vs. CRAZX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs Growth and Income Strategy Portfolio (GOIIX) and Columbia Adaptive Risk Allocation Fund (CRAZX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	GOIIX	CRAZX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.37	2.87	-0.49
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.33	4.06	-0.73
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.44	1.54	-0.10
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.87	4.20	-1.33
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	12.67	18.89	-6.22
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

GOIIX vs. CRAZX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GOIIX Sharpe Ratio is 2.37, which is comparable to the CRAZX Sharpe Ratio of 2.87. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GOIIX and CRAZX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	GOIIX	CRAZX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.37	2.87	-0.49
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.72	0.68	+0.05
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.78	0.87	-0.09
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.55	0.71	-0.15

Drawdowns

GOIIX vs. CRAZX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GOIIX drawdown since its inception was -43.63%, which is greater than CRAZX's maximum drawdown of -18.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GOIIX and CRAZX.

Drawdown Indicators

	GOIIX	CRAZX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-43.63%	-18.21%	-25.42%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.17%	-5.16%	-2.01%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-12.19%	-8.82%	-3.37%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-23.78%	-18.21%	-5.57%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-25.07%	-18.21%	-6.86%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.41%	-4.20%	-2.21%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.62%	1.15%	+0.47%

Volatility

GOIIX vs. CRAZX - Volatility Comparison

Goldman Sachs Growth and Income Strategy Portfolio (GOIIX) has a higher volatility of 2.65% compared to Columbia Adaptive Risk Allocation Fund (CRAZX) at 2.19%. This indicates that GOIIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CRAZX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	GOIIX	CRAZX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.65%	2.19%	+0.46%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	6.99%	5.86%	+1.13%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	8.69%	7.58%	+1.11%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	10.65%	8.66%	+1.99%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	11.27%	8.29%	+2.98%

GOIIX vs. CRAZX - Expense Ratio Comparison

GOIIX has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is lower than CRAZX's 0.74% expense ratio.

Dividends

GOIIX vs. CRAZX - Dividend Comparison

GOIIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.96%, more than CRAZX's 2.61% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CRAZX Columbia Adaptive Risk Allocation Fund	2.61%	2.87%	2.52%	0.55%	8.14%	20.39%	2.12%	7.51%	6.22%	7.14%	0.94%	1.03%
GOIIX Goldman Sachs Growth and Income Strategy Portfolio	7.96%	7.98%	9.79%	1.97%	5.09%	6.80%	3.47%	2.29%	3.04%	2.73%	1.37%	3.99%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both GOIIX and CRAZX in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.93, GOIIX and CRAZX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, GOIIX or CRAZX?

GOIIX has higher volatility (2.65%) compared to CRAZX (2.19%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GOIIX dropped -43.63% vs CRAZX's -18.21%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

CRAZX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.87 vs 2.37), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.