GOGY.TO vs. ZWG.TO
GOGY.TO (Harvest Alphabet Enhanced High Income Shares ETF Class A Units) and ZWG.TO (BMO Global High Dividend Covered Call ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, GOGY.TO returned 123.99% vs 22.65% for ZWG.TO. At a 0.36 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. GOGY.TO charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for ZWG.TO.
Performance
GOGY.TO vs. ZWG.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GOGY.TO achieves a 14.33% return, which is significantly higher than ZWG.TO's 11.46% return.
GOGY.TO
- 1D
- -0.88%
- 1M
- -5.59%
- YTD
- 14.33%
- 6M
- 10.62%
- 1Y
- 123.99%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ZWG.TO
- 1D
- -0.41%
- 1M
- 7.53%
- YTD
- 11.46%
- 6M
- 8.19%
- 1Y
- 22.65%
- 3Y*
- 16.14%
- 5Y*
- 10.76%
- 10Y*
- —
GOGY.TO vs. ZWG.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
GOGY.TO Harvest Alphabet Enhanced High Income Shares ETF Class A Units | 14.33% | 80.98% |
ZWG.TO BMO Global High Dividend Covered Call ETF | 11.46% | 5.25% |
Correlation
The correlation between GOGY.TO and ZWG.TO is 0.31, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.31 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 7, 2025 | 0.36 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GOGY.TO vs. ZWG.TO — Risk / Return Rank
GOGY.TO
ZWG.TO
GOGY.TO vs. ZWG.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Harvest Alphabet Enhanced High Income Shares ETF Class A Units (GOGY.TO) and BMO Global High Dividend Covered Call ETF (ZWG.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GOGY.TO | ZWG.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 4.08 | 2.08 | +2.00 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 5.07 | 2.98 | +2.09 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.62 | 1.37 | +0.25 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 6.19 | 3.31 | +2.88 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 22.77 | 12.68 | +10.09 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GOGY.TO | ZWG.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.08 | 2.08 | +2.00 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.92 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 2.31 | 0.21 | +2.11 |
Drawdowns
GOGY.TO vs. ZWG.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GOGY.TO drawdown since its inception was -20.87%, smaller than the maximum ZWG.TO drawdown of -25.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GOGY.TO and ZWG.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GOGY.TO | ZWG.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -20.87% | -25.55% | +4.68% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -20.14% | -6.88% | -13.26% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -14.87% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -15.62% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -10.57% | -0.56% | -10.01% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.07% | -3.46% | -1.61% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.47% | 1.79% | +3.68% |
Volatility
GOGY.TO vs. ZWG.TO - Volatility Comparison
Harvest Alphabet Enhanced High Income Shares ETF Class A Units (GOGY.TO) has a higher volatility of 9.16% compared to BMO Global High Dividend Covered Call ETF (ZWG.TO) at 4.16%. This indicates that GOGY.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ZWG.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GOGY.TO | ZWG.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.16% | 4.16% | +5.00% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 21.42% | 8.75% | +12.67% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 30.67% | 10.95% | +19.72% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 34.61% | 11.71% | +22.90% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 34.61% | 239.97% | -205.36% |
GOGY.TO vs. ZWG.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
GOGY.TO has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than ZWG.TO's 0.65% expense ratio.
Dividends
GOGY.TO vs. ZWG.TO - Dividend Comparison
GOGY.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.78%, more than ZWG.TO's 5.88% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GOGY.TO Harvest Alphabet Enhanced High Income Shares ETF Class A Units | 12.78% | 8.04% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
ZWG.TO BMO Global High Dividend Covered Call ETF | 5.88% | 6.41% | 6.48% | 7.42% | 7.23% | 6.40% | 6.09% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GOGY.TO and ZWG.TO have a correlation of 0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, GOGY.TO is cheaper at 0.40% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
GOGY.TO is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for ZWG.TO.
They also come from different issuers: Harvest and BMO. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for GOGY.TO and 0.65% for ZWG.TO.
Find the right allocation for GOGY.TO and ZWG.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer