GOGY.TO vs. HYLD.TO
GOGY.TO (Harvest Alphabet Enhanced High Income Shares ETF Class A Units) and HYLD.TO (Hamilton Enhanced U.S. Covered Call ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, GOGY.TO returned 121.95% vs 39.70% for HYLD.TO. A 0.51 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. GOGY.TO charges 0.40%/yr vs 2.37%/yr for HYLD.TO.
Performance
GOGY.TO vs. HYLD.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with GOGY.TO having a 15.35% return and HYLD.TO slightly higher at 15.73%.
GOGY.TO
- 1D
- -4.62%
- 1M
- -5.12%
- YTD
- 15.35%
- 6M
- 13.01%
- 1Y
- 121.95%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
HYLD.TO
- 1D
- 0.09%
- 1M
- 9.70%
- YTD
- 15.73%
- 6M
- 15.82%
- 1Y
- 39.70%
- 3Y*
- 23.83%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GOGY.TO vs. HYLD.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
GOGY.TO Harvest Alphabet Enhanced High Income Shares ETF Class A Units | 15.35% | 80.98% |
HYLD.TO Hamilton Enhanced U.S. Covered Call ETF | 15.73% | 26.72% |
Correlation
The correlation between GOGY.TO and HYLD.TO is 0.48, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.48 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 7, 2025 | 0.51 |
The correlation between GOGY.TO and HYLD.TO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.48 to 0.51 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GOGY.TO vs. HYLD.TO — Risk / Return Rank
GOGY.TO
HYLD.TO
GOGY.TO vs. HYLD.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Harvest Alphabet Enhanced High Income Shares ETF Class A Units (GOGY.TO) and Hamilton Enhanced U.S. Covered Call ETF (HYLD.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GOGY.TO | HYLD.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 4.00 | 2.61 | +1.40 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 4.99 | 3.52 | +1.47 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.61 | 1.47 | +0.14 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.88 | 3.31 | +2.57 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 21.83 | 14.63 | +7.20 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GOGY.TO | HYLD.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.00 | 2.61 | +1.40 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 2.36 | 0.69 | +1.66 |
Drawdowns
GOGY.TO vs. HYLD.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GOGY.TO drawdown since its inception was -20.87%, smaller than the maximum HYLD.TO drawdown of -31.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GOGY.TO and HYLD.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GOGY.TO | HYLD.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -20.87% | -31.38% | +10.51% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -20.14% | -12.04% | -8.10% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -21.83% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.77% | 0.00% | -9.77% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.05% | -8.91% | +3.86% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.43% | 2.72% | +2.71% |
Volatility
GOGY.TO vs. HYLD.TO - Volatility Comparison
Harvest Alphabet Enhanced High Income Shares ETF Class A Units (GOGY.TO) has a higher volatility of 9.13% compared to Hamilton Enhanced U.S. Covered Call ETF (HYLD.TO) at 4.58%. This indicates that GOGY.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HYLD.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GOGY.TO | HYLD.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.13% | 4.58% | +4.55% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 21.49% | 12.17% | +9.32% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 30.71% | 15.31% | +15.40% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 34.65% | 19.22% | +15.43% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 34.65% | 19.22% | +15.43% |
GOGY.TO vs. HYLD.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
GOGY.TO has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than HYLD.TO's 2.37% expense ratio.
Dividends
GOGY.TO vs. HYLD.TO - Dividend Comparison
GOGY.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.67%, more than HYLD.TO's 11.23% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GOGY.TO Harvest Alphabet Enhanced High Income Shares ETF Class A Units | 12.67% | 8.04% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
HYLD.TO Hamilton Enhanced U.S. Covered Call ETF | 11.23% | 11.98% | 12.13% | 12.11% | 13.02% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GOGY.TO and HYLD.TO have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, GOGY.TO is cheaper at 0.40% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
GOGY.TO is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 2.37% for HYLD.TO.
They also come from different issuers: Harvest and Hamilton Capital. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for GOGY.TO and 2.37% for HYLD.TO.
Find the right allocation for GOGY.TO and HYLD.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer