GOGB.L vs. PACW.L

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

GOGB.L (VanEck Morningstar Global Wide Moat UCITS ETF) and PACW.L (Amundi Prime All Country World UCITS ETF Income) are both Global Equities funds - GOGB.L tracks the MSCI ACWI NR USD while PACW.L tracks the Solactive GBS Global Markets Large & Mid Cap Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, GOGB.L returned 9.85% vs 30.12% for PACW.L. A 0.78 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. GOGB.L charges 0.52%/yr vs 0.07%/yr for PACW.L.

Performance

GOGB.L vs. PACW.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in VanEck Morningstar Global Wide Moat UCITS ETF (GOGB.L) and Amundi Prime All Country World UCITS ETF Income (PACW.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GOGB.L achieves a -0.27% return, which is significantly lower than PACW.L's 11.92% return.

GOGB.L

• 1D: 0.44%
• 1M: -1.22%
• YTD: -0.27%
• 6M: -0.46%
• 1Y: 9.85%
• 3Y*: 10.33%
• 5Y*: 7.54%
• 10Y*: —

PACW.L

• 1D: -0.04%
• 1M: 3.73%
• YTD: 11.92%
• 6M: 11.76%
• 1Y: 30.12%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GOGB.L vs. PACW.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
GOGB.L VanEck Morningstar Global Wide Moat UCITS ETF	-0.27%	8.91%
PACW.L Amundi Prime All Country World UCITS ETF Income	11.92%	9.58%

Correlation

The correlation between GOGB.L and PACW.L is 0.75, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.75
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 19, 2025	0.78

The correlation between GOGB.L and PACW.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.75 to 0.78 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

GOGB.L vs. PACW.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GOGB.L

GOGB.L Risk / Return Rank: 23
GOGB.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 25
GOGB.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 24
GOGB.L Omega Ratio Rank: 24
GOGB.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 21
GOGB.L Martin Ratio Rank: 23

PACW.L

PACW.L Risk / Return Rank: 86
PACW.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
PACW.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
PACW.L Omega Ratio Rank: 89
PACW.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 82
PACW.L Martin Ratio Rank: 85

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GOGB.L vs. PACW.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Morningstar Global Wide Moat UCITS ETF (GOGB.L) and Amundi Prime All Country World UCITS ETF Income (PACW.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	GOGB.L	PACW.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.87	2.89	-2.02
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.28	3.95	-2.67
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.16	1.55	-0.39
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.90	4.27	-3.37
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	2.92	17.43	-14.51
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

GOGB.L vs. PACW.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GOGB.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.87, which is lower than the PACW.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.89. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GOGB.L and PACW.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	GOGB.L	PACW.L	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.87	2.89	-2.02
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.60	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.72	1.24	-0.51

Drawdowns

GOGB.L vs. PACW.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GOGB.L drawdown since its inception was -13.86%, smaller than the maximum PACW.L drawdown of -17.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GOGB.L and PACW.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	GOGB.L	PACW.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-13.86%	-17.68%	+3.82%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.89%	-7.06%	-3.83%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-13.86%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-13.86%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-5.25%	-0.46%	-4.79%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.25%	-3.02%	-0.23%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.38%	1.73%	+1.65%

Volatility

GOGB.L vs. PACW.L - Volatility Comparison

VanEck Morningstar Global Wide Moat UCITS ETF (GOGB.L) has a higher volatility of 3.27% compared to Amundi Prime All Country World UCITS ETF Income (PACW.L) at 2.93%. This indicates that GOGB.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PACW.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	GOGB.L	PACW.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.27%	2.93%	+0.34%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.18%	7.75%	+1.43%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.34%	10.42%	+0.92%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	12.66%	13.91%	-1.25%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	12.97%	13.91%	-0.94%

GOGB.L vs. PACW.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

GOGB.L has a 0.52% expense ratio, which is higher than PACW.L's 0.07% expense ratio.

Dividends

GOGB.L vs. PACW.L - Dividend Comparison

GOGB.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while PACW.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.23%.

Position	TTM
GOGB.L VanEck Morningstar Global Wide Moat UCITS ETF	0.00%
PACW.L Amundi Prime All Country World UCITS ETF Income	1.23%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both GOGB.L and PACW.L in my portfolio?

GOGB.L and PACW.L have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, GOGB.L or PACW.L?

On fees, PACW.L is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, GOGB.L or PACW.L?

PACW.L is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.52% for GOGB.L.

What is the main difference between GOGB.L and PACW.L?

GOGB.L tracks MSCI ACWI NR USD, while PACW.L tracks Solactive GBS Global Markets Large & Mid Cap Index. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.52% for GOGB.L and 0.07% for PACW.L.