GOF vs. RYOCX
Compare and contrast key facts about Guggenheim Strategic Opportunities Fund (GOF) and Rydex NASDAQ-100 Fund Investor Class (RYOCX).
GOF is an actively managed fund by Guggenheim. It was launched on Jul 26, 2007. RYOCX is a passively managed fund by Guggenheim that tracks the performance of the NASDAQ-100 Index. It was launched on Feb 14, 1994.
Performance
GOF vs. RYOCX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
GOF vs. RYOCX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GOF Guggenheim Strategic Opportunities Fund | -10.50% | -1.92% | 38.04% | -3.04% | -5.78% | 4.90% | 21.51% | 10.51% | -5.95% | 22.01% |
RYOCX Rydex NASDAQ-100 Fund Investor Class | -9.21% | 19.51% | 24.34% | 53.31% | -33.34% | 25.85% | 46.80% | 40.33% | -1.36% | 31.20% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GOF achieves a -10.50% return, which is significantly lower than RYOCX's -9.21% return. Over the past 10 years, GOF has underperformed RYOCX with an annualized return of 8.35%, while RYOCX has yielded a comparatively higher 17.39% annualized return.
GOF
- 1D
- 3.47%
- 1M
- -6.66%
- YTD
- -10.50%
- 6M
- -19.80%
- 1Y
- -16.95%
- 3Y*
- 2.28%
- 5Y*
- 0.76%
- 10Y*
- 8.35%
RYOCX
- 1D
- -0.76%
- 1M
- -8.06%
- YTD
- -9.21%
- 6M
- -7.26%
- 1Y
- 18.41%
- 3Y*
- 19.76%
- 5Y*
- 11.33%
- 10Y*
- 17.39%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
GOF vs. RYOCX - Expense Ratio Comparison
GOF has a 1.62% expense ratio, which is higher than RYOCX's 1.24% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
GOF vs. RYOCX — Risk / Return Rank
GOF
RYOCX
GOF vs. RYOCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Guggenheim Strategic Opportunities Fund (GOF) and Rydex NASDAQ-100 Fund Investor Class (RYOCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GOF | RYOCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.81 | 0.82 | -1.63 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.91 | 1.32 | -2.24 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.84 | 1.19 | -0.35 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.72 | 1.20 | -1.92 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.63 | 4.41 | -6.04 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GOF | RYOCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.81 | 0.82 | -1.63 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.04 | 0.50 | -0.46 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.43 | 0.77 | -0.34 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.41 | 0.51 | -0.10 |
Correlation
The correlation between GOF and RYOCX is 0.32, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
GOF vs. RYOCX - Dividend Comparison
GOF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 19.83%, more than RYOCX's 4.71% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GOF Guggenheim Strategic Opportunities Fund | 19.83% | 16.97% | 14.32% | 17.07% | 14.36% | 11.93% | 11.26% | 12.08% | 11.96% | 10.13% | 11.13% | 12.98% |
RYOCX Rydex NASDAQ-100 Fund Investor Class | 4.71% | 4.28% | 7.23% | 0.00% | 8.82% | 4.47% | 4.17% | 3.80% | 1.86% | 6.00% | 1.75% | 2.03% |
Drawdowns
GOF vs. RYOCX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GOF drawdown since its inception was -54.66%, smaller than the maximum RYOCX drawdown of -83.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GOF and RYOCX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| GOF | RYOCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -54.66% | -83.75% | +29.09% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -23.24% | -12.75% | -10.49% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -32.41% | -38.04% | +5.63% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -38.50% | -38.04% | -0.46% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -20.28% | -12.31% | -7.97% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.96% | -32.05% | +25.09% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 10.31% | 3.47% | +6.84% |
Volatility
GOF vs. RYOCX - Volatility Comparison
Guggenheim Strategic Opportunities Fund (GOF) has a higher volatility of 6.45% compared to Rydex NASDAQ-100 Fund Investor Class (RYOCX) at 5.40%. This indicates that GOF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RYOCX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| GOF | RYOCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.45% | 5.40% | +1.05% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.88% | 12.43% | +4.45% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.08% | 22.54% | -1.46% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.71% | 22.75% | -4.04% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.48% | 22.55% | -3.07% |