GOF vs. GIJAX
GOF (Guggenheim Strategic Opportunities Fund) and GIJAX (Guggenheim Municipal Income Fund) are both mutual funds - GOF is a Multisector Bonds fund actively managed by Guggenheim, while GIJAX is a Municipal Bonds fund managed by Guggenheim. Over the past 10 years, GOF returned 7.56%/yr vs 1.35%/yr for GIJAX. At a 0.18 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. GOF charges 1.89%/yr vs 0.79%/yr for GIJAX.
Performance
GOF vs. GIJAX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GOF achieves a -10.48% return, which is significantly lower than GIJAX's 1.69% return. Over the past 10 years, GOF has outperformed GIJAX with an annualized return of 7.56%, while GIJAX has yielded a comparatively lower 1.35% annualized return.
GOF
- 1D
- -0.94%
- 1M
- -3.73%
- YTD
- -10.48%
- 6M
- -7.84%
- 1Y
- -15.22%
- 3Y*
- 2.55%
- 5Y*
- -0.00%
- 10Y*
- 7.56%
GIJAX
- 1D
- -0.09%
- 1M
- 1.61%
- YTD
- 1.69%
- 6M
- 2.16%
- 1Y
- 7.82%
- 3Y*
- 3.68%
- 5Y*
- -0.42%
- 10Y*
- 1.35%
GOF vs. GIJAX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GOF Guggenheim Strategic Opportunities Fund | -10.48% | -1.92% | 38.04% | -3.04% | -5.78% | 4.90% | 21.51% | 10.51% | -5.95% | 22.01% |
GIJAX Guggenheim Municipal Income Fund | 1.69% | 5.11% | 2.49% | 3.39% | -13.84% | 1.52% | 5.01% | 6.84% | 0.84% | 5.76% |
Correlation
The correlation between GOF and GIJAX is 0.16, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.16 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.15 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.18 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.13 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 27, 2007 | 0.18 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GOF vs. GIJAX — Risk / Return Rank
GOF
GIJAX
GOF vs. GIJAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Guggenheim Strategic Opportunities Fund (GOF) and Guggenheim Municipal Income Fund (GIJAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GOF | GIJAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -3.70 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -5.59 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.84 | 1.72 | -0.88 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.66 | 2.98 | -3.64 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.18 | 12.00 | -13.18 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GOF vs. GIJAX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GOF drawdown since its inception was -54.66%, smaller than the maximum GIJAX drawdown of -58.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GOF and GIJAX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GOF | GIJAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -54.66% | -58.74% | +4.08% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -23.24% | -2.65% | -20.59% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -28.56% | -7.29% | -21.27% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -32.41% | -19.73% | -12.68% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -38.50% | -19.73% | -18.77% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -20.26% | -3.65% | -16.61% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.09% | -16.89% | +9.80% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 12.91% | 0.65% | +12.26% |
Volatility
GOF vs. GIJAX - Volatility Comparison
Guggenheim Strategic Opportunities Fund (GOF) has a higher volatility of 3.41% compared to Guggenheim Municipal Income Fund (GIJAX) at 0.82%. This indicates that GOF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GIJAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GOF | GIJAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.41% | 0.82% | +2.59% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.10% | 2.16% | +8.94% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.06% | 2.76% | +15.30% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.20% | 4.55% | +13.65% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.53% | 4.44% | +15.09% |
GOF vs. GIJAX - Expense Ratio Comparison
GOF has a 1.89% expense ratio, which is higher than GIJAX's 0.79% expense ratio.
Dividends
GOF vs. GIJAX - Dividend Comparison
GOF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 20.81%, more than GIJAX's 3.26% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GIJAX Guggenheim Municipal Income Fund | 3.26% | 2.91% | 3.16% | 1.90% | 2.79% | 1.82% | 1.84% | 2.21% | 2.73% | 2.23% | 2.05% | 2.27% |
GOF Guggenheim Strategic Opportunities Fund | 20.81% | 16.97% | 14.32% | 17.07% | 14.36% | 11.93% | 11.26% | 12.08% | 11.96% | 10.13% | 11.13% | 12.98% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GOF and GIJAX have a correlation of 0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GOF has higher volatility (3.41%) compared to GIJAX (0.82%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GOF dropped -54.66% vs GIJAX's -58.74%.
GIJAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.85 vs -0.85), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GOF and GIJAX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer