GNOV vs. HELO
GNOV (FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Moderate Buffer ETF - November) and HELO (JPMorgan Hedged Equity Laddered Overlay ETF) are both Options Trading funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, GNOV returned 16.72% vs 10.13% for HELO. Their correlation of 0.86 suggests significant overlap in exposure. GNOV charges 0.85%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for HELO.
Performance
GNOV vs. HELO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GNOV achieves a 4.37% return, which is significantly higher than HELO's 1.45% return.
GNOV
- 1D
- -0.74%
- 1M
- 0.53%
- YTD
- 4.37%
- 6M
- 4.77%
- 1Y
- 16.72%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
HELO
- 1D
- -0.80%
- 1M
- -0.65%
- YTD
- 1.45%
- 6M
- 1.77%
- 1Y
- 10.13%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GNOV vs. HELO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
GNOV FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Moderate Buffer ETF - November | 4.37% | 13.55% | 10.35% | 2.85% |
HELO JPMorgan Hedged Equity Laddered Overlay ETF | 1.45% | 7.82% | 18.05% | 1.96% |
Correlation
The correlation between GNOV and HELO is 0.89, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.89 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 21, 2023 | 0.86 |
The correlation between GNOV and HELO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.86 to 0.89 - a consistent structural relationship.
GNOV vs. HELO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
GNOV
HELO
Technology
Financial Services
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Technology
GNOV
HELO
Financial Services
GNOV
HELO
Communication Services
GNOV
HELO
Consumer Cyclical
GNOV
HELO
Healthcare
GNOV
HELO
Industrials
GNOV
HELO
Consumer Defensive
GNOV
HELO
Energy
GNOV
HELO
Utilities
GNOV
HELO
Real Estate
GNOV
HELO
Basic Materials
GNOV
HELO
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GNOV vs. HELO — Risk / Return Rank
GNOV
HELO
GNOV vs. HELO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Moderate Buffer ETF - November (GNOV) and JPMorgan Hedged Equity Laddered Overlay ETF (HELO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GNOV | HELO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.26 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.05 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.60 | 1.32 | +0.28 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.68 | 1.77 | +1.91 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 20.64 | 7.80 | +12.84 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GNOV | HELO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.89 | 1.63 | +1.26 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.64 | 1.58 | +0.05 |
Drawdowns
GNOV vs. HELO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GNOV drawdown since its inception was -10.70%, roughly equal to the maximum HELO drawdown of -10.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GNOV and HELO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GNOV | HELO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -10.70% | -10.89% | +0.19% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.56% | -5.76% | +1.20% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.74% | -1.12% | +0.38% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.71% | -1.18% | +0.47% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.81% | 1.30% | -0.49% |
Volatility
GNOV vs. HELO - Volatility Comparison
FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Moderate Buffer ETF - November (GNOV) and JPMorgan Hedged Equity Laddered Overlay ETF (HELO) have volatilities of 1.06% and 1.02%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GNOV | HELO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.06% | 1.02% | +0.04% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 4.67% | 5.06% | -0.39% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 5.83% | 6.26% | -0.43% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 7.63% | 7.96% | -0.33% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 7.63% | 7.96% | -0.33% |
GNOV vs. HELO - Expense Ratio Comparison
GNOV has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than HELO's 0.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
GNOV vs. HELO - Dividend Comparison
GNOV has not paid dividends to shareholders, while HELO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.63%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
GNOV FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Moderate Buffer ETF - November | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
HELO JPMorgan Hedged Equity Laddered Overlay ETF | 0.63% | 0.67% | 0.60% | 0.19% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GNOV and HELO have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GNOV has higher volatility (1.06%) compared to HELO (1.02%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GNOV dropped -10.70% vs HELO's -10.89%.
On 1-year performance, GNOV leads with 16.72% vs 10.13% for HELO. On fees, HELO is cheaper at 0.50% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, GNOV has performed better with a 16.72% return vs 10.13%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
HELO is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for GNOV.
HELO has the higher dividend yield at 0.63%, compared with 0.00% for GNOV.
They also come from different issuers: FT Vest and JPMorgan. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for GNOV and 0.50% for HELO.
GNOV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.89 vs 1.63), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GNOV and HELO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer