PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GNOM vs. BTEC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GNOM vs. BTEC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X Genomics & Biotechnology ETF (GNOM) and Principal Healthcare Innovators Index ETF (BTEC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


GNOM

1D
1.99%
1M
5.82%
YTD
7.81%
6M
6.65%
1Y
54.21%
3Y*
-0.94%
5Y*
-10.20%
10Y*

BTEC

1D
0.00%
1M
0.00%
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GNOM vs. BTEC - Yearly Performance Comparison


GNOM vs. BTEC - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
GNOM
BTEC

Healthcare

99.6%
99.4%

Technology

0.4%

-

Basic Materials

-

-

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

-

Financial Services

-

-

Industrials

-

0.6%

Real Estate

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Healthcare

GNOM
99.6%
BTEC
99.4%

Technology

GNOM
0.4%
BTEC

-

Basic Materials

GNOM

-

BTEC

-

Communication Services

GNOM

-

BTEC

-

Consumer Cyclical

GNOM

-

BTEC

-

Consumer Defensive

GNOM

-

BTEC

-

Energy

GNOM

-

BTEC

-

Financial Services

GNOM

-

BTEC

-

Industrials

GNOM

-

BTEC
0.6%

Real Estate

GNOM

-

BTEC

-

Utilities

GNOM

-

BTEC

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GNOM vs. BTEC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GNOM
GNOM Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
GNOM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GNOM Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
GNOM Omega Ratio Rank: 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
GNOM Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
GNOM Martin Ratio Rank: 5151
Martin Ratio Rank

BTEC
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GNOM vs. BTEC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Genomics & Biotechnology ETF (GNOM) and Principal Healthcare Innovators Index ETF (BTEC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GNOMBTECDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.00

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.62

GNOM vs. BTEC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GNOMBTECDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.06

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.31

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.09

Drawdowns

GNOM vs. BTEC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GNOM drawdown since its inception was -75.00%, which is greater than BTEC's maximum drawdown of 0.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GNOM and BTEC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GNOMBTECDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-75.00%

0.00%

-75.00%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-18.17%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-46.47%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-72.29%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-55.45%

0.00%

-55.45%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-40.55%

0.00%

-40.55%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.30%

Volatility

GNOM vs. BTEC - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GNOMBTECDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.47%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

19.44%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

26.50%

0.00%

+26.50%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

33.57%

0.00%

+33.57%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

34.17%

0.00%

+34.17%

GNOM vs. BTEC - Expense Ratio Comparison

GNOM has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than BTEC's 0.42% expense ratio.


Dividends

GNOM vs. BTEC - Dividend Comparison

GNOM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.27%, while BTEC has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020
BTEC
Principal Healthcare Innovators Index ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
GNOM
Global X Genomics & Biotechnology ETF
1.27%1.37%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.03%0.14%

Frequently Asked Questions


On fees, BTEC is cheaper at 0.42% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

BTEC is cheaper with a 0.42% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for GNOM.

GNOM has the higher dividend yield at 1.27%, compared with 0.00% for BTEC.

GNOM tracks Solactive Genomics Index, while BTEC tracks NASDAQ U.S. Health Care Innovators Index. They also come from different issuers: Global X and Principal. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for GNOM and 0.42% for BTEC.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GNOM and BTEC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer