PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GNOM.L vs. HERG.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GNOM.L vs. HERG.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X Genomics & Biotechnology UCITS ETF (GNOM.L) and Global X Video Games & Esports UCITS ETF Dist GBP (HERG.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

GNOM.L is traded in USD, while HERG.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the HERG.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GNOM.L achieves a 22.10% return, which is significantly higher than HERG.L's -15.92% return.


GNOM.L

1D
-0.17%
1M
11.69%
6M
15.71%
YTD
22.10%
1Y
62.79%
3Y*
4.58%
5Y*
10Y*

HERG.L

1D
-0.47%
1M
0.44%
6M
-19.30%
YTD
-15.92%
1Y
-19.79%
3Y*
5.46%
5Y*
-4.75%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GNOM.L vs. HERG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
GNOM.L
Global X Genomics & Biotechnology UCITS ETF
22.10%19.30%-17.99%-5.77%-37.21%-8.59%
HERG.L
Global X Video Games & Esports UCITS ETF Dist GBP
-15.92%24.33%18.50%5.82%-35.31%-4.30%

Correlation

The correlation between GNOM.L and HERG.L is 0.32, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.32

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.43

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 2, 2021

0.54

Over the past year, the correlation between GNOM.L and HERG.L has dropped to 0.32 - well below their long-term average of 0.54, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GNOM.L vs. HERG.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GNOM.L
GNOM.L Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
GNOM.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GNOM.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
GNOM.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
GNOM.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
GNOM.L Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank

HERG.L
HERG.L Risk / Return Rank: 22
Overall Rank
HERG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HERG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
Sortino Ratio Rank
HERG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 22
Omega Ratio Rank
HERG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
Calmar Ratio Rank
HERG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 33
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GNOM.L vs. HERG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Genomics & Biotechnology UCITS ETF (GNOM.L) and Global X Video Games & Esports UCITS ETF Dist GBP (HERG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


GNOM.LHERG.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+3.14

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+4.34

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

0.84

+0.50

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.35

-0.63

+3.98

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.16

-1.18

+10.34

GNOM.L vs. HERG.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GNOM.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.12, which is higher than the HERG.L Sharpe Ratio of -1.02. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GNOM.L and HERG.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

GNOM.L vs. HERG.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GNOM.L drawdown since its inception was -69.32%, which is greater than HERG.L's maximum drawdown of -55.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GNOM.L and HERG.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GNOM.LHERG.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-69.32%

-55.80%

-13.52%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-18.91%

-31.18%

+12.27%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-44.77%

-31.18%

-13.59%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-47.51%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-37.11%

-35.63%

-1.48%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-47.16%

-34.47%

-12.69%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.92%

16.73%

-9.81%

Volatility

GNOM.L vs. HERG.L - Volatility Comparison

Global X Genomics & Biotechnology UCITS ETF (GNOM.L) has a higher volatility of 8.41% compared to Global X Video Games & Esports UCITS ETF Dist GBP (HERG.L) at 5.66%. This indicates that GNOM.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HERG.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GNOM.LHERG.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.41%

5.66%

+2.75%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

22.18%

15.96%

+6.22%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

29.87%

19.31%

+10.56%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

33.11%

22.34%

+10.77%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

33.11%

22.40%

+10.71%

GNOM.L vs. HERG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both GNOM.L and HERG.L have an expense ratio of 0.50%.


Dividends

GNOM.L vs. HERG.L - Dividend Comparison

GNOM.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while HERG.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.00%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021
GNOM.L
Global X Genomics & Biotechnology UCITS ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
HERG.L
Global X Video Games & Esports UCITS ETF Dist GBP
1.00%0.60%0.37%0.26%0.01%0.07%

Frequently Asked Questions


GNOM.L and HERG.L have a correlation of 0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Both ETFs have the same 0.50% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

GNOM.L and HERG.L have the same expense ratio: 0.50% per year.

GNOM.L is categorized as Health & Biotech Equities, while HERG.L is Technology Equities. GNOM.L tracks Global X Genomics & Biotechnology UCITS ETF, while HERG.L tracks MSCI World/Information Tech NR USD.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GNOM.L and HERG.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer