PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GNOG.L vs. WBIO.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GNOG.L vs. WBIO.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Global X Genomics & Biotechnology UCITS ETF (GNOG.L) and WisdomTree BioRevolution UCITS ETF USD Acc (WBIO.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

GNOG.L is traded in GBP, while WBIO.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the WBIO.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GNOG.L achieves a 12.27% return, which is significantly higher than WBIO.L's 10.42% return.


GNOG.L

1D
5.70%
1M
13.66%
YTD
12.27%
6M
9.47%
1Y
59.40%
3Y*
-1.86%
5Y*
10Y*

WBIO.L

1D
4.36%
1M
4.49%
YTD
10.42%
6M
10.40%
1Y
50.88%
3Y*
1.10%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GNOG.L vs. WBIO.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
GNOG.L
Global X Genomics & Biotechnology UCITS ETF
12.27%12.03%-16.98%-11.35%-29.74%-5.47%
WBIO.L
WisdomTree BioRevolution UCITS ETF USD Acc
10.42%13.58%-14.08%-5.86%-18.74%-1.39%

Correlation

The correlation between GNOG.L and WBIO.L is 0.88, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.88

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.90

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 10, 2021

0.91

The correlation between GNOG.L and WBIO.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.88 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.

GNOG.L vs. WBIO.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
GNOG.L
WBIO.L

Healthcare

99.7%
87.3%

Technology

0.3%

-

Basic Materials

-

7.6%

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

5.1%

Energy

-

-

Financial Services

-

-

Industrials

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Healthcare

GNOG.L
99.7%
WBIO.L
87.3%

Technology

GNOG.L
0.3%
WBIO.L

-

Basic Materials

GNOG.L

-

WBIO.L
7.6%

Communication Services

GNOG.L

-

WBIO.L

-

Consumer Cyclical

GNOG.L

-

WBIO.L

-

Consumer Defensive

GNOG.L

-

WBIO.L
5.1%

Energy

GNOG.L

-

WBIO.L

-

Financial Services

GNOG.L

-

WBIO.L

-

Industrials

GNOG.L

-

WBIO.L

-

Real Estate

GNOG.L

-

WBIO.L

-

Utilities

GNOG.L

-

WBIO.L

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GNOG.L vs. WBIO.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GNOG.L
GNOG.L Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
GNOG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GNOG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
GNOG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
GNOG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
GNOG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank

WBIO.L
WBIO.L Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
WBIO.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WBIO.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
WBIO.L Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
WBIO.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
WBIO.L Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GNOG.L vs. WBIO.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Genomics & Biotechnology UCITS ETF (GNOG.L) and WisdomTree BioRevolution UCITS ETF USD Acc (WBIO.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GNOG.LWBIO.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.25

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.32

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.31

+0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.44

4.40

-0.96

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.72

10.38

-1.66

GNOG.L vs. WBIO.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GNOG.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.16, which is comparable to the WBIO.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.91. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GNOG.L and WBIO.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GNOG.LWBIO.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.16

1.91

+0.25

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.36

-0.19

-0.17

Drawdowns

GNOG.L vs. WBIO.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GNOG.L drawdown since its inception was -67.50%, which is greater than WBIO.L's maximum drawdown of -51.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GNOG.L and WBIO.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GNOG.LWBIO.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-67.50%

-51.13%

-16.37%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-17.16%

-11.50%

-5.66%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-47.97%

-39.34%

-8.63%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-41.78%

-18.76%

-23.02%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-44.20%

-26.35%

-17.85%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.79%

4.89%

+1.90%

Volatility

GNOG.L vs. WBIO.L - Volatility Comparison

Global X Genomics & Biotechnology UCITS ETF (GNOG.L) has a higher volatility of 7.97% compared to WisdomTree BioRevolution UCITS ETF USD Acc (WBIO.L) at 6.84%. This indicates that GNOG.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than WBIO.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GNOG.LWBIO.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.97%

6.84%

+1.13%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

19.73%

17.06%

+2.67%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

27.38%

26.57%

+0.81%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

31.21%

23.70%

+7.51%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

31.21%

23.70%

+7.51%

GNOG.L vs. WBIO.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

GNOG.L has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than WBIO.L's 0.45% expense ratio.


Dividends

GNOG.L vs. WBIO.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither GNOG.L nor WBIO.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


GNOG.L and WBIO.L have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, WBIO.L is cheaper at 0.45% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

WBIO.L is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for GNOG.L.

GNOG.L tracks MSCI World/Health Care NR USD, while WBIO.L tracks NASDAQ Biotechnology TR USD. They also come from different issuers: Global X and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for GNOG.L and 0.45% for WBIO.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GNOG.L and WBIO.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer