PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GNMFX vs. FHMIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GNMFX vs. FHMIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PIMCO National Municipal Opportunistic Value Fund (GNMFX) and Federated Hermes Conservative Municipal Microshort Fund (FHMIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GNMFX achieves a 1.98% return, which is significantly higher than FHMIX's 1.11% return.


GNMFX

1D
-0.10%
1M
1.67%
YTD
1.98%
6M
2.31%
1Y
6.61%
3Y*
3.48%
5Y*
1.45%
10Y*
2.01%

FHMIX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.21%
YTD
1.11%
6M
1.37%
1Y
2.85%
3Y*
1.90%
5Y*
1.14%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GNMFX vs. FHMIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
GNMFX
PIMCO National Municipal Opportunistic Value Fund
1.98%3.09%2.38%4.89%-5.25%0.72%
FHMIX
Federated Hermes Conservative Municipal Microshort Fund
1.11%3.09%1.19%0.32%0.00%0.02%

Correlation

The correlation between GNMFX and FHMIX is 0.26, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.26

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.23

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.18

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 25, 2021

0.18

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GNMFX vs. FHMIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GNMFX
GNMFX Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
GNMFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GNMFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
GNMFX Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
GNMFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
GNMFX Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank

FHMIX
FHMIX Risk / Return Rank: 9999
Overall Rank
FHMIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FHMIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 100100
Sortino Ratio Rank
FHMIX Omega Ratio Rank: 100100
Omega Ratio Rank
FHMIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 100100
Calmar Ratio Rank
FHMIX Martin Ratio Rank: 100100
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GNMFX vs. FHMIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PIMCO National Municipal Opportunistic Value Fund (GNMFX) and Federated Hermes Conservative Municipal Microshort Fund (FHMIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


GNMFXFHMIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.68

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-7.49

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.61

5.69

-4.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.18

28.61

-25.43

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.09

77.74

-66.65

GNMFX vs. FHMIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GNMFX Sharpe Ratio is 2.52, which is comparable to the FHMIX Sharpe Ratio of 3.20. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GNMFX and FHMIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

GNMFX vs. FHMIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GNMFX drawdown since its inception was -9.06%, which is greater than FHMIX's maximum drawdown of -0.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GNMFX and FHMIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GNMFXFHMIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-9.06%

-0.50%

-8.56%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.13%

-0.10%

-2.03%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-4.91%

-0.50%

-4.41%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-9.06%

-0.50%

-8.56%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-9.06%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.10%

0.00%

-0.10%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.38%

-0.06%

-1.32%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.61%

0.04%

+0.57%

Volatility

GNMFX vs. FHMIX - Volatility Comparison

PIMCO National Municipal Opportunistic Value Fund (GNMFX) has a higher volatility of 0.78% compared to Federated Hermes Conservative Municipal Microshort Fund (FHMIX) at 0.21%. This indicates that GNMFX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FHMIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GNMFXFHMIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.78%

0.21%

+0.57%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.96%

0.56%

+1.40%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.69%

0.90%

+1.79%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

3.34%

0.79%

+2.55%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

2.96%

0.78%

+2.18%

GNMFX vs. FHMIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

GNMFX has a 0.63% expense ratio, which is higher than FHMIX's 0.05% expense ratio.


Dividends

GNMFX vs. FHMIX - Dividend Comparison

GNMFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.67%, more than FHMIX's 2.80% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
FHMIX
Federated Hermes Conservative Municipal Microshort Fund
2.80%3.04%1.18%0.32%0.00%0.02%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
GNMFX
PIMCO National Municipal Opportunistic Value Fund
3.67%3.61%3.48%2.68%1.98%2.17%2.24%2.59%2.45%0.89%0.17%

Frequently Asked Questions


GNMFX and FHMIX have a correlation of 0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GNMFX has higher volatility (0.78%) compared to FHMIX (0.21%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GNMFX dropped -9.06% vs FHMIX's -0.50%.

FHMIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.20 vs 2.52), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GNMFX and FHMIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer