GMUEX vs. FSWCX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

GMUEX (GMO U.S. Equity Fund) and FSWCX (Fidelity SAI U.S. Value Index Fund) are both Large Cap Value Equities funds. Over the past 5 years, GMUEX returned 13.77%/yr vs 14.34%/yr for FSWCX. Their correlation of 0.86 suggests significant overlap in exposure. GMUEX charges 0.47%/yr vs 0.10%/yr for FSWCX.

Performance

GMUEX vs. FSWCX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GMO U.S. Equity Fund (GMUEX) and Fidelity SAI U.S. Value Index Fund (FSWCX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with GMUEX having a 16.91% return and FSWCX slightly lower at 16.21%.

GMUEX

• 1D: 0.77%
• 1M: 9.18%
• YTD: 16.91%
• 6M: 18.19%
• 1Y: 43.66%
• 3Y*: 24.91%
• 5Y*: 13.77%
• 10Y*: 14.52%

FSWCX

• 1D: 0.13%
• 1M: 7.42%
• YTD: 16.21%
• 6M: 18.61%
• 1Y: 38.95%
• 3Y*: 24.35%
• 5Y*: 14.34%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GMUEX vs. FSWCX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
GMUEX GMO U.S. Equity Fund	16.91%	22.24%	20.97%	22.02%	-12.66%	24.28%	13.56%	28.62%	-9.77%	-0.52%
FSWCX Fidelity SAI U.S. Value Index Fund	16.21%	22.50%	19.90%	12.64%	-3.50%	30.43%	-4.44%	29.09%	-11.54%	0.77%

Correlation

The correlation between GMUEX and FSWCX is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.77
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.79
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.85
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 20, 2017	0.86

The correlation between GMUEX and FSWCX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.77 to 0.86 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

GMUEX vs. FSWCX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GMUEX

GMUEX Risk / Return Rank: 91
GMUEX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 94
GMUEX Sortino Ratio Rank: 90
GMUEX Omega Ratio Rank: 84
GMUEX Calmar Ratio Rank: 91
GMUEX Martin Ratio Rank: 93

FSWCX

FSWCX Risk / Return Rank: 95
FSWCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 97
FSWCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 95
FSWCX Omega Ratio Rank: 91
FSWCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 97
FSWCX Martin Ratio Rank: 96

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GMUEX vs. FSWCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GMO U.S. Equity Fund (GMUEX) and Fidelity SAI U.S. Value Index Fund (FSWCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	GMUEX	FSWCX	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	3.28	3.64	-0.36
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	4.41	4.98	-0.58
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.57	1.67	-0.09
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.86	7.06	-2.21
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	20.65	24.81	-4.16
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

GMUEX vs. FSWCX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GMUEX Sharpe Ratio is 3.28, which is comparable to the FSWCX Sharpe Ratio of 3.64. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GMUEX and FSWCX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	GMUEX	FSWCX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.28	3.64	-0.36
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.70	0.86	-0.17
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.75	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.30	0.59	-0.29

Drawdowns

GMUEX vs. FSWCX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GMUEX drawdown since its inception was -60.66%, which is greater than FSWCX's maximum drawdown of -41.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GMUEX and FSWCX.

Drawdown Indicators

	GMUEX	FSWCX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-60.66%	-41.41%	-19.25%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.19%	-5.77%	-3.42%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-20.85%	-16.13%	-4.72%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-28.95%	-19.62%	-9.33%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-33.90%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-17.25%	-5.57%	-11.68%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.16%	1.63%	+0.53%

Volatility

GMUEX vs. FSWCX - Volatility Comparison

GMO U.S. Equity Fund (GMUEX) has a higher volatility of 3.97% compared to Fidelity SAI U.S. Value Index Fund (FSWCX) at 2.77%. This indicates that GMUEX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FSWCX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	GMUEX	FSWCX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.97%	2.77%	+1.20%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.45%	7.64%	+2.81%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.59%	11.19%	+2.40%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	19.82%	16.70%	+3.12%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.50%	20.78%	-1.28%

GMUEX vs. FSWCX - Expense Ratio Comparison

GMUEX has a 0.47% expense ratio, which is higher than FSWCX's 0.10% expense ratio.

Dividends

GMUEX vs. FSWCX - Dividend Comparison

GMUEX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.99%, more than FSWCX's 6.37% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FSWCX Fidelity SAI U.S. Value Index Fund	6.37%	7.40%	8.86%	9.68%	12.90%	5.71%	2.55%	2.37%	3.84%	0.07%	0.00%	0.00%
GMUEX GMO U.S. Equity Fund	9.99%	11.68%	17.31%	12.10%	6.99%	14.17%	9.16%	12.24%	21.90%	11.22%	11.27%	12.88%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both GMUEX and FSWCX in my portfolio?

GMUEX and FSWCX have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, GMUEX or FSWCX?

GMUEX has higher volatility (3.97%) compared to FSWCX (2.77%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GMUEX dropped -60.66% vs FSWCX's -41.41%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FSWCX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.64 vs 3.28), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.