PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GMTZX vs. FFBQX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GMTZX vs. FFBQX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GuideStone Funds MyDestination 2015 Fund (GMTZX) and Fidelity Freedom Blend 2065 Fund Class K6 (FFBQX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GMTZX achieves a 4.78% return, which is significantly lower than FFBQX's 14.10% return.


GMTZX

1D
0.56%
1M
0.09%
6M
3.47%
YTD
4.78%
1Y
9.66%
3Y*
9.46%
5Y*
4.18%
10Y*
5.64%
ALL TIME*
4.84%

FFBQX

1D
1.25%
1M
0.68%
6M
9.59%
YTD
14.10%
1Y
25.00%
3Y*
20.20%
5Y*
10.58%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
13.18%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

GMTZX vs. FFBQX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
GMTZX
GuideStone Funds MyDestination 2015 Fund
4.78%11.55%7.50%10.86%-13.11%6.74%9.16%5.04%
FFBQX
Fidelity Freedom Blend 2065 Fund Class K6
14.10%22.90%16.84%20.67%-18.86%16.47%18.10%9.13%

Correlation

The correlation between GMTZX and FFBQX is 0.94, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.94

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.89

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.91

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 28, 2019

0.91

The correlation between GMTZX and FFBQX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GMTZX vs. FFBQX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

GMTZX
GMTZX Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
GMTZX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GMTZX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
GMTZX Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
GMTZX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4848
Calmar Ratio Rank
GMTZX Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank

FFBQX
FFBQX Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
FFBQX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FFBQX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
FFBQX Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
FFBQX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
FFBQX Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

GMTZX vs. FFBQX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GuideStone Funds MyDestination 2015 Fund (GMTZX) and Fidelity Freedom Blend 2065 Fund Class K6 (FFBQX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


GMTZXFFBQXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.21

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.18

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.34

-0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.11

2.78

-0.66

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.18

11.60

-2.41

GMTZX vs. FFBQX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GMTZX Sharpe Ratio is 1.67, which is comparable to the FFBQX Sharpe Ratio of 1.88. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GMTZX and FFBQX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

GMTZX vs. FFBQX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GMTZX drawdown since its inception was -43.84%, which is greater than FFBQX's maximum drawdown of -31.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GMTZX and FFBQX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GMTZXFFBQXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-43.84%

-31.34%

-12.50%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.95%

-9.67%

+4.72%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.32%

-15.51%

+9.19%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.76%

-27.60%

+9.84%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-17.83%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.37%

-0.56%

+0.19%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.87%

-5.86%

+0.99%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.14%

2.31%

-1.17%

Volatility

GMTZX vs. FFBQX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for GuideStone Funds MyDestination 2015 Fund (GMTZX) is 1.94%, while Fidelity Freedom Blend 2065 Fund Class K6 (FFBQX) has a volatility of 4.52%. This indicates that GMTZX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FFBQX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GMTZXFFBQXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.94%

4.52%

-2.58%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.37%

12.30%

-6.93%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.29%

14.32%

-8.03%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.32%

15.37%

-8.05%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

7.29%

17.27%

-9.98%

GMTZX vs. FFBQX - Expense Ratio Comparison

GMTZX has a 0.36% expense ratio, which is higher than FFBQX's 0.29% expense ratio.


Dividends

GMTZX vs. FFBQX - Dividend Comparison

GMTZX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.40%, more than FFBQX's 3.32% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FFBQX
Fidelity Freedom Blend 2065 Fund Class K6
3.32%2.58%5.66%2.07%5.40%6.98%3.62%2.96%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
GMTZX
GuideStone Funds MyDestination 2015 Fund
5.40%5.66%6.34%3.77%7.27%5.35%3.64%4.01%6.38%2.62%1.45%15.43%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.94, GMTZX and FFBQX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FFBQX has higher volatility (4.52%) compared to GMTZX (1.94%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GMTZX dropped -43.84% vs FFBQX's -31.34%.

FFBQX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.88 vs 1.67), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GMTZX and FFBQX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer