GMSAX vs. GSSRX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

GMSAX (Goldman Sachs Managed Futures Strategy Fund Class A) and GSSRX (Goldman Sachs Short Duration Bond Fund) are both mutual funds - GMSAX is a Systematic Trend fund managed by Goldman Sachs, while GSSRX is a Short-Term Bond fund managed by Goldman Sachs. Over the past 10 years, GMSAX returned 3.07%/yr vs 2.42%/yr for GSSRX. At a correlation of -0.08, they often move in opposite directions. GMSAX charges 1.54%/yr vs 0.48%/yr for GSSRX.

Performance

GMSAX vs. GSSRX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Goldman Sachs Managed Futures Strategy Fund Class A (GMSAX) and Goldman Sachs Short Duration Bond Fund (GSSRX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GMSAX achieves a 7.84% return, which is significantly higher than GSSRX's 0.83% return. Over the past 10 years, GMSAX has outperformed GSSRX with an annualized return of 3.07%, while GSSRX has yielded a comparatively lower 2.42% annualized return.

GMSAX

• 1D: 0.42%
• 1M: 3.44%
• YTD: 7.84%
• 6M: 8.20%
• 1Y: 17.87%
• 3Y*: 0.45%
• 5Y*: 3.08%
• 10Y*: 3.07%

GSSRX

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.48%
• YTD: 0.83%
• 6M: 1.29%
• 1Y: 4.76%
• 3Y*: 5.09%
• 5Y*: 2.06%
• 10Y*: 2.42%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GMSAX vs. GSSRX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
GMSAX Goldman Sachs Managed Futures Strategy Fund Class A	7.84%	0.22%	-5.31%	-4.18%	20.08%	4.68%	6.64%	2.29%	-2.37%	2.29%
GSSRX Goldman Sachs Short Duration Bond Fund	0.83%	6.57%	4.53%	5.28%	-6.06%	-0.86%	5.85%	6.79%	-0.02%	1.61%

Correlation

The correlation between GMSAX and GSSRX is -0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.01
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	-0.11
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.26
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	-0.12
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2013	-0.08

The correlation between GMSAX and GSSRX shifts across timeframes, from -0.26 (5 years) to -0.01 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

GMSAX vs. GSSRX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GMSAX

GMSAX Risk / Return Rank: 64
GMSAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 60
GMSAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 59
GMSAX Omega Ratio Rank: 58
GMSAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 81
GMSAX Martin Ratio Rank: 60

GSSRX

GSSRX Risk / Return Rank: 69
GSSRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 54
GSSRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 84
GSSRX Omega Ratio Rank: 80
GSSRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 60
GSSRX Martin Ratio Rank: 67

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GMSAX vs. GSSRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs Managed Futures Strategy Fund Class A (GMSAX) and Goldman Sachs Short Duration Bond Fund (GSSRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	GMSAX	GSSRX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.30	2.16	+0.14
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.23	3.99	-0.77
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.43	1.53	-0.10
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.72	2.96	+0.76
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	11.97	13.08	-1.11
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

GMSAX vs. GSSRX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GMSAX Sharpe Ratio is 2.30, which is comparable to the GSSRX Sharpe Ratio of 2.16. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GMSAX and GSSRX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	GMSAX	GSSRX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.30	2.16	+0.14
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.30	0.85	-0.56
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.34	1.01	-0.67
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.26	0.98	-0.72

Drawdowns

GMSAX vs. GSSRX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GMSAX drawdown since its inception was -23.58%, which is greater than GSSRX's maximum drawdown of -9.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GMSAX and GSSRX.

Drawdown Indicators

	GMSAX	GSSRX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-23.58%	-9.03%	-14.55%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-4.81%	-1.62%	-3.19%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-22.56%	-1.62%	-20.94%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-23.58%	-8.88%	-14.70%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-23.58%	-9.03%	-14.55%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-6.37%	-0.10%	-6.27%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.26%	-1.26%	-6.00%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.49%	0.36%	+1.13%

Volatility

GMSAX vs. GSSRX - Volatility Comparison

Goldman Sachs Managed Futures Strategy Fund Class A (GMSAX) has a higher volatility of 2.05% compared to Goldman Sachs Short Duration Bond Fund (GSSRX) at 0.71%. This indicates that GMSAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GSSRX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	GMSAX	GSSRX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.05%	0.71%	+1.34%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	6.01%	1.77%	+4.24%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	7.79%	2.22%	+5.57%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	10.41%	2.43%	+7.98%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	9.07%	2.41%	+6.66%

GMSAX vs. GSSRX - Expense Ratio Comparison

GMSAX has a 1.54% expense ratio, which is higher than GSSRX's 0.48% expense ratio.

Dividends

GMSAX vs. GSSRX - Dividend Comparison

GMSAX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while GSSRX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.35%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
GMSAX Goldman Sachs Managed Futures Strategy Fund Class A	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	20.24%	7.31%	1.24%	6.90%	0.16%	0.49%	0.00%	3.88%
GSSRX Goldman Sachs Short Duration Bond Fund	4.35%	4.18%	3.58%	2.36%	1.59%	1.40%	2.20%	2.87%	2.56%	2.21%	2.04%	2.15%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both GMSAX and GSSRX in my portfolio?

GMSAX and GSSRX have a correlation of -0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, GMSAX or GSSRX?

GMSAX has higher volatility (2.05%) compared to GSSRX (0.71%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GMSAX dropped -23.58% vs GSSRX's -9.03%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

GMSAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.30 vs 2.16), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.