GMOV vs. VUSV

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

GMOV (GMO U.S. Value ETF) and VUSV (Vanguard Wellington U.S. Value Active ETF) are both Large Cap Value Equities funds. GMOV is passively managed, while VUSV is actively managed. Their correlation of 0.83 suggests significant overlap in exposure. GMOV charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.30%/yr for VUSV.

Performance

GMOV vs. VUSV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GMO U.S. Value ETF (GMOV) and Vanguard Wellington U.S. Value Active ETF (VUSV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GMOV achieves a 11.41% return, which is significantly higher than VUSV's 8.98% return.

GMOV

• 1D: 1.06%
• 1M: 3.06%
• YTD: 11.41%
• 6M: 12.96%
• 1Y: 28.90%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

VUSV

• 1D: 1.41%
• 1M: 3.31%
• YTD: 8.98%
• 6M: 10.08%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GMOV vs. VUSV - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
GMOV GMO U.S. Value ETF	11.41%	5.27%
VUSV Vanguard Wellington U.S. Value Active ETF	8.98%	5.48%

Correlation

The correlation between GMOV and VUSV is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 19, 2025	0.83

Return for Risk

GMOV vs. VUSV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GMOV

GMOV Risk / Return Rank: 84
GMOV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 83
GMOV Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
GMOV Omega Ratio Rank: 80
GMOV Calmar Ratio Rank: 87
GMOV Martin Ratio Rank: 82

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GMOV vs. VUSV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GMO U.S. Value ETF (GMOV) and Vanguard Wellington U.S. Value Active ETF (VUSV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	GMOV	VUSV	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.66	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.95	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.47	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.78	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	16.11	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	GMOV	VUSV	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.66	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.06	2.48	-1.41

Drawdowns

GMOV vs. VUSV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GMOV drawdown since its inception was -16.71%, which is greater than VUSV's maximum drawdown of -7.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GMOV and VUSV.

Drawdown Indicators

	GMOV	VUSV	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-16.71%	-7.06%	-9.65%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.08%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.84%	-1.30%	-1.54%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.80%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	GMOV	VUSV	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.34%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	7.32%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.92%	12.03%	-1.11%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.94%	12.03%	+2.91%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	14.94%	12.03%	+2.91%

GMOV vs. VUSV - Expense Ratio Comparison

GMOV has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than VUSV's 0.30% expense ratio.

Dividends

GMOV vs. VUSV - Dividend Comparison

GMOV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.00%, more than VUSV's 0.18% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
GMOV GMO U.S. Value ETF	2.00%	1.98%	0.30%
VUSV Vanguard Wellington U.S. Value Active ETF	0.18%	0.20%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both GMOV and VUSV in my portfolio?

GMOV and VUSV have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, GMOV or VUSV?

On fees, VUSV is cheaper at 0.30% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, GMOV or VUSV?

VUSV is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for GMOV.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, GMOV or VUSV?

GMOV has the higher dividend yield at 2.00%, compared with 0.18% for VUSV.

What is the main difference between GMOV and VUSV?

They also come from different issuers: GMO and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for GMOV and 0.30% for VUSV.