GMGZX vs. URTRX

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

GMGZX (GuideStone Funds MyDestination 2055 Fund) and URTRX (USAA Target Retirement 2030 Fund) are both Target Retirement Date funds. Over the past 10 years, GMGZX returned 11.42%/yr vs 7.96%/yr for URTRX. With a 0.96 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. GMGZX charges 0.42%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for URTRX.

Performance

GMGZX vs. URTRX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GuideStone Funds MyDestination 2055 Fund (GMGZX) and USAA Target Retirement 2030 Fund (URTRX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GMGZX achieves a 10.55% return, which is significantly higher than URTRX's 7.71% return. Over the past 10 years, GMGZX has outperformed URTRX with an annualized return of 11.42%, while URTRX has yielded a comparatively lower 7.96% annualized return.

GMGZX

• 1D: -0.74%
• 1M: 3.20%
• YTD: 10.55%
• 6M: 11.12%
• 1Y: 24.66%
• 3Y*: 18.41%
• 5Y*: 9.50%
• 10Y*: 11.42%

URTRX

• 1D: -0.42%
• 1M: 2.22%
• YTD: 7.71%
• 6M: 8.17%
• 1Y: 17.25%
• 3Y*: 12.99%
• 5Y*: 6.38%
• 10Y*: 7.96%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GMGZX vs. URTRX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
GMGZX GuideStone Funds MyDestination 2055 Fund	10.55%	19.19%	15.12%	19.50%	-17.62%	17.15%	13.94%	24.93%	-8.09%	21.75%
URTRX USAA Target Retirement 2030 Fund	7.71%	14.78%	8.09%	13.98%	-13.23%	12.23%	9.25%	17.13%	-6.98%	16.14%

Correlation

The correlation between GMGZX and URTRX is 0.97 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.97
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.96
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.96
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.96
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2012	0.96

The correlation between GMGZX and URTRX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.96 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

GMGZX vs. URTRX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GMGZX

GMGZX Risk / Return Rank: 56
GMGZX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
GMGZX Sortino Ratio Rank: 53
GMGZX Omega Ratio Rank: 53
GMGZX Calmar Ratio Rank: 53
GMGZX Martin Ratio Rank: 64

URTRX

URTRX Risk / Return Rank: 73
URTRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 72
URTRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 72
URTRX Omega Ratio Rank: 70
URTRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 74
URTRX Martin Ratio Rank: 78

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GMGZX vs. URTRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GuideStone Funds MyDestination 2055 Fund (GMGZX) and USAA Target Retirement 2030 Fund (URTRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	GMGZX	URTRX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.16	2.46	-0.30
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.03	3.55	-0.52
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.39	1.46	-0.07
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.74	3.33	-0.59
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	12.31	14.39	-2.08
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

GMGZX vs. URTRX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GMGZX Sharpe Ratio is 2.16, which is comparable to the URTRX Sharpe Ratio of 2.46. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GMGZX and URTRX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	GMGZX	URTRX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.16	2.46	-0.30
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.66	0.66	0.00
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.76	0.77	-0.01
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.60	0.61	0.00

Drawdowns

GMGZX vs. URTRX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GMGZX drawdown since its inception was -29.63%, smaller than the maximum URTRX drawdown of -34.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GMGZX and URTRX.

Drawdown Indicators

	GMGZX	URTRX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-29.63%	-34.10%	+4.47%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.13%	-5.29%	-3.84%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-15.25%	-9.12%	-6.13%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-25.16%	-19.52%	-5.64%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-29.63%	-23.56%	-6.07%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.74%	-0.42%	-0.32%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.84%	-4.15%	-1.69%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.03%	1.22%	+0.81%

Volatility

GMGZX vs. URTRX - Volatility Comparison

GuideStone Funds MyDestination 2055 Fund (GMGZX) has a higher volatility of 3.49% compared to USAA Target Retirement 2030 Fund (URTRX) at 2.54%. This indicates that GMGZX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than URTRX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	GMGZX	URTRX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.49%	2.54%	+0.95%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.23%	5.82%	+3.41%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.61%	7.16%	+4.45%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.38%	9.69%	+4.69%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.04%	10.35%	+4.69%

GMGZX vs. URTRX - Expense Ratio Comparison

GMGZX has a 0.42% expense ratio, which is higher than URTRX's 0.03% expense ratio.

Dividends

GMGZX vs. URTRX - Dividend Comparison

GMGZX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.46%, less than URTRX's 6.29% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
GMGZX GuideStone Funds MyDestination 2055 Fund	3.46%	3.83%	4.44%	2.85%	5.99%	5.27%	2.10%	4.10%	7.97%	4.58%	4.01%	0.00%
URTRX USAA Target Retirement 2030 Fund	6.29%	6.78%	3.16%	4.24%	9.53%	7.66%	4.53%	11.43%	8.54%	8.10%	4.06%	2.80%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both GMGZX and URTRX in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.97, GMGZX and URTRX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, GMGZX or URTRX?

GMGZX has higher volatility (3.49%) compared to URTRX (2.54%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GMGZX dropped -29.63% vs URTRX's -34.10%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

URTRX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.46 vs 2.16), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.