PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GMGZX vs. GMDYX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GMGZX vs. GMDYX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GuideStone Funds MyDestination 2055 Fund (GMGZX) and GuideStone Funds Medium-Duration Bond Fund (GMDYX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GMGZX achieves a 10.50% return, which is significantly higher than GMDYX's 0.10% return. Over the past 10 years, GMGZX has outperformed GMDYX with an annualized return of 11.17%, while GMDYX has yielded a comparatively lower 1.70% annualized return.


GMGZX

1D
-0.60%
1M
0.75%
6M
7.90%
YTD
10.50%
1Y
20.06%
3Y*
16.57%
5Y*
9.47%
10Y*
11.17%

GMDYX

1D
-0.08%
1M
-0.24%
6M
0.01%
YTD
0.10%
1Y
4.88%
3Y*
4.42%
5Y*
-0.22%
10Y*
1.70%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GMGZX vs. GMDYX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GMGZX
GuideStone Funds MyDestination 2055 Fund
10.50%19.19%15.12%19.50%-17.62%17.15%13.94%24.93%-8.09%21.75%
GMDYX
GuideStone Funds Medium-Duration Bond Fund
0.10%8.23%1.86%6.28%-14.96%-2.16%9.18%9.81%-0.39%4.11%

Correlation

The correlation between GMGZX and GMDYX is 0.42, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.42

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.32

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.24

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.11

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2012

0.02

Over the past year, GMGZX and GMDYX have become more correlated (0.42) than their long-term average of 0.02, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GMGZX vs. GMDYX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GMGZX
GMGZX Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
GMGZX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GMGZX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5151
Sortino Ratio Rank
GMGZX Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
GMGZX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
GMGZX Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank

GMDYX
GMDYX Risk / Return Rank: 2929
Overall Rank
GMDYX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3131
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GMDYX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3131
Sortino Ratio Rank
GMDYX Omega Ratio Rank: 2929
Omega Ratio Rank
GMDYX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2828
Calmar Ratio Rank
GMDYX Martin Ratio Rank: 2424
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GMGZX vs. GMDYX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GuideStone Funds MyDestination 2055 Fund (GMGZX) and GuideStone Funds Medium-Duration Bond Fund (GMDYX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


GMGZXGMDYXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.42

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.50

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.23

+0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.28

1.64

+0.64

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.92

4.52

+5.40

GMGZX vs. GMDYX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GMGZX Sharpe Ratio is 1.68, which is higher than the GMDYX Sharpe Ratio of 1.26. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GMGZX and GMDYX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

GMGZX vs. GMDYX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GMGZX drawdown since its inception was -29.63%, which is greater than GMDYX's maximum drawdown of -23.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GMGZX and GMDYX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GMGZXGMDYXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-29.63%

-23.08%

-6.55%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.13%

-2.94%

-6.19%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.25%

-6.60%

-8.65%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.16%

-20.30%

-4.86%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-29.63%

-20.75%

-8.88%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.78%

-2.43%

+1.65%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.81%

-6.72%

+0.91%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.09%

1.06%

+1.03%

Volatility

GMGZX vs. GMDYX - Volatility Comparison

GuideStone Funds MyDestination 2055 Fund (GMGZX) has a higher volatility of 3.40% compared to GuideStone Funds Medium-Duration Bond Fund (GMDYX) at 1.14%. This indicates that GMGZX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GMDYX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GMGZXGMDYXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.40%

1.14%

+2.26%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.34%

3.08%

+7.26%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.39%

3.83%

+8.56%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.52%

5.96%

+8.56%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.94%

4.96%

+9.98%

GMGZX vs. GMDYX - Expense Ratio Comparison

GMGZX has a 0.42% expense ratio, which is higher than GMDYX's 0.39% expense ratio.


Dividends

GMGZX vs. GMDYX - Dividend Comparison

GMGZX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.47%, less than GMDYX's 4.50% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GMDYX
GuideStone Funds Medium-Duration Bond Fund
4.50%4.53%4.67%3.56%1.87%1.87%4.82%4.09%2.78%2.11%2.09%3.25%
GMGZX
GuideStone Funds MyDestination 2055 Fund
3.47%3.83%4.44%2.85%5.99%5.27%2.10%4.10%7.97%4.58%4.01%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


GMGZX and GMDYX have a correlation of 0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GMGZX has higher volatility (3.40%) compared to GMDYX (1.14%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GMGZX dropped -29.63% vs GMDYX's -23.08%.

GMGZX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.68 vs 1.26), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GMGZX and GMDYX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer