PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GMAY vs. APRH
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

GMAY vs. APRH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Moderate Buffer ETF - May (GMAY) and Innovator Premium Income 20 Barrier ETF - April (APRH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

GMAY vs. APRH - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
GMAY
FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Moderate Buffer ETF - May
0.00%11.94%12.12%8.88%
APRH
Innovator Premium Income 20 Barrier ETF - April
1.07%5.84%6.91%5.83%

Returns By Period


GMAY

1D
0.57%
1M
-0.80%
YTD
0.00%
6M
1.89%
1Y
13.63%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

APRH

1D
0.21%
1M
0.41%
YTD
1.07%
6M
1.34%
1Y
5.81%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


GMAY vs. APRH - Expense Ratio Comparison

GMAY has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than APRH's 0.79% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

GMAY vs. APRH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GMAY
GMAY Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
GMAY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GMAY Sortino Ratio Rank: 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
GMAY Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
GMAY Calmar Ratio Rank: 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
GMAY Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank

APRH
APRH Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
APRH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4242
Sharpe Ratio Rank
APRH Sortino Ratio Rank: 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
APRH Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
APRH Calmar Ratio Rank: 3232
Calmar Ratio Rank
APRH Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GMAY vs. APRH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Moderate Buffer ETF - May (GMAY) and Innovator Premium Income 20 Barrier ETF - April (APRH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GMAYAPRHDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.31

0.85

+0.47

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.98

1.32

+0.66

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.32

+0.04

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.62

0.99

+0.63

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

10.49

6.58

+3.91

GMAY vs. APRH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GMAY Sharpe Ratio is 1.31, which is higher than the APRH Sharpe Ratio of 0.85. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GMAY and APRH, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GMAYAPRHDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.31

0.85

+0.47

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.45

1.52

-0.07

Correlation

The correlation between GMAY and APRH is 0.61, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

GMAY vs. APRH - Dividend Comparison

GMAY has not paid dividends to shareholders, while APRH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.54%.


Drawdowns

GMAY vs. APRH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GMAY drawdown since its inception was -11.75%, which is greater than APRH's maximum drawdown of -5.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GMAY and APRH.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


GMAYAPRHDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-11.75%

-5.87%

-5.88%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.58%

-5.81%

-2.77%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.16%

-0.01%

-1.15%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.76%

-0.22%

-0.54%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.32%

0.88%

+0.44%

Volatility

GMAY vs. APRH - Volatility Comparison

FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Moderate Buffer ETF - May (GMAY) has a higher volatility of 2.70% compared to Innovator Premium Income 20 Barrier ETF - April (APRH) at 0.58%. This indicates that GMAY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than APRH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


GMAYAPRHDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.70%

0.58%

+2.12%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.80%

1.56%

+2.24%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.44%

6.89%

+3.55%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

8.00%

4.62%

+3.38%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

8.00%

4.62%

+3.38%