PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GMAR vs. XLRI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GMAR vs. XLRI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Moderate Buffer ETF - March (GMAR) and State Street Real Estate Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF (XLRI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GMAR achieves a 7.33% return, which is significantly higher than XLRI's 6.39% return.


GMAR

1D
-0.11%
1M
-0.18%
YTD
7.33%
6M
7.41%
1Y
13.54%
3Y*
11.79%
5Y*
10Y*

XLRI

1D
-0.30%
1M
0.93%
YTD
6.39%
6M
6.48%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GMAR vs. XLRI - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between GMAR and XLRI is 0.24, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 30, 2025

0.24

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GMAR vs. XLRI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GMAR
GMAR Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
GMAR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GMAR Sortino Ratio Rank: 9797
Sortino Ratio Rank
GMAR Omega Ratio Rank: 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
GMAR Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
GMAR Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank

XLRI

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GMAR vs. XLRI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Moderate Buffer ETF - March (GMAR) and State Street Real Estate Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF (XLRI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


GMARXLRIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.86

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

7.58

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

49.05

GMAR vs. XLRI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

GMAR vs. XLRI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GMAR drawdown since its inception was -9.11%, which is greater than XLRI's maximum drawdown of -7.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GMAR and XLRI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GMARXLRIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-9.11%

-7.12%

-1.99%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.79%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-9.11%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.72%

-0.84%

+0.12%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.54%

-1.64%

+1.10%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.28%

Volatility

GMAR vs. XLRI - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GMARXLRIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.42%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.26%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.93%

10.97%

-7.04%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.82%

10.97%

-4.15%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.82%

10.97%

-4.15%

GMAR vs. XLRI - Expense Ratio Comparison

GMAR has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than XLRI's 0.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

GMAR vs. XLRI - Dividend Comparison

GMAR has not paid dividends to shareholders, while XLRI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.27%.


Frequently Asked Questions


GMAR and XLRI have a correlation of 0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XLRI is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XLRI is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for GMAR.

XLRI has the higher dividend yield at 12.27%, compared with 0.00% for GMAR.

GMAR is categorized as Options Trading, while XLRI is Derivative Income. They also come from different issuers: FT Vest and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for GMAR and 0.35% for XLRI.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GMAR and XLRI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer