PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GMAR vs. HOCT
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

GMAR vs. HOCT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Moderate Buffer ETF - March (GMAR) and Innovator Premium Income 9 Buffer ETF - October (HOCT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

GMAR vs. HOCT - Yearly Performance Comparison


Returns By Period


GMAR

1D
1.56%
1M
0.87%
YTD
1.83%
6M
3.97%
1Y
12.07%
3Y*
11.13%
5Y*
10Y*

HOCT

1D
0.00%
1M
0.00%
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


GMAR vs. HOCT - Expense Ratio Comparison

GMAR has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than HOCT's 0.79% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

GMAR vs. HOCT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GMAR
GMAR Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
GMAR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GMAR Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
GMAR Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
GMAR Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
GMAR Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank

HOCT
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GMAR vs. HOCT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Moderate Buffer ETF - March (GMAR) and Innovator Premium Income 9 Buffer ETF - October (HOCT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GMARHOCTDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.43

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.09

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.45

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.83

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

11.88

GMAR vs. HOCT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GMARHOCTDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.43

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.69

Dividends

GMAR vs. HOCT - Dividend Comparison

Neither GMAR nor HOCT has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

GMAR vs. HOCT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GMAR drawdown since its inception was -9.11%, which is greater than HOCT's maximum drawdown of 0.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GMAR and HOCT.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


GMARHOCTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-9.11%

0.00%

-9.11%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.85%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.26%

0.00%

-0.26%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.57%

0.00%

-0.57%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.05%

Volatility

GMAR vs. HOCT - Volatility Comparison


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


GMARHOCTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.18%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.84%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.50%

0.00%

+8.50%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.96%

0.00%

+6.96%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.96%

0.00%

+6.96%