GMAR vs. FDND

Last updated Jun 25, 2026

GMAR (FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Moderate Buffer ETF - March) and FDND (FT Vest Dow Jones Internet & Target Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - GMAR is a Options Trading fund actively managed by FT Vest, while FDND is a Technology Equities fund actively managed by FT Vest. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, GMAR returned 13.54% vs -3.53% for FDND. A 0.67 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. GMAR charges 0.85%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for FDND.

Performance

GMAR vs. FDND - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Moderate Buffer ETF - March (GMAR) and FT Vest Dow Jones Internet & Target Income ETF (FDND). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GMAR achieves a 7.33% return, which is significantly higher than FDND's -5.34% return.

GMAR

• 1D: -0.11%
• 1M: -0.18%
• YTD: 7.33%
• 6M: 7.41%
• 1Y: 13.54%
• 3Y*: 11.79%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

FDND

• 1D: 0.03%
• 1M: -5.72%
• YTD: -5.34%
• 6M: -6.15%
• 1Y: -3.53%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GMAR vs. FDND - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
GMAR FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Moderate Buffer ETF - March	7.33%	9.29%	9.28%
FDND FT Vest Dow Jones Internet & Target Income ETF	-5.34%	9.69%	15.85%

Correlation

The correlation between GMAR and FDND is 0.61, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.61
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 21, 2024	0.67

The correlation between GMAR and FDND has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.61 to 0.67 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

GMAR vs. FDND — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GMAR

GMAR Risk / Return Rank: 97
GMAR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 96
GMAR Sortino Ratio Rank: 97
GMAR Omega Ratio Rank: 97
GMAR Calmar Ratio Rank: 96
GMAR Martin Ratio Rank: 98

FDND

FDND Risk / Return Rank: 7
FDND Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7
FDND Sortino Ratio Rank: 7
FDND Omega Ratio Rank: 7
FDND Calmar Ratio Rank: 8
FDND Martin Ratio Rank: 7

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GMAR vs. FDND - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Moderate Buffer ETF - March (GMAR) and FT Vest Dow Jones Internet & Target Income ETF (FDND). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	GMAR	FDND	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	3.47	-0.19	+3.66
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	5.72	-0.13	+5.85
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.86	0.98	+0.87
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	7.58	-0.17	+7.75
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	49.05	-0.41	+49.46

GMAR vs. FDND - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GMAR Sharpe Ratio is 3.47, which is higher than the FDND Sharpe Ratio of -0.19. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GMAR and FDND, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

GMAR vs. FDND - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GMAR drawdown since its inception was -9.11%, smaller than the maximum FDND drawdown of -24.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GMAR and FDND.

Drawdown Indicators

	GMAR	FDND	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-9.11%	-24.12%	+15.01%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-1.79%	-20.49%	+18.70%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-9.11%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.72%	-11.49%	+10.77%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.54%	-5.74%	+5.20%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.28%	8.65%	-8.37%

Volatility

GMAR vs. FDND - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Moderate Buffer ETF - March (GMAR) is 1.42%, while FT Vest Dow Jones Internet & Target Income ETF (FDND) has a volatility of 7.14%. This indicates that GMAR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FDND based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	GMAR	FDND	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.42%	7.14%	-5.72%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	3.26%	14.99%	-11.73%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.93%	18.95%	-15.02%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	6.82%	21.48%	-14.66%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	6.82%	21.48%	-14.66%

GMAR vs. FDND - Expense Ratio Comparison

GMAR has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than FDND's 0.75% expense ratio.

Dividends

GMAR vs. FDND - Dividend Comparison

GMAR has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FDND's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.63%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
FDND FT Vest Dow Jones Internet & Target Income ETF	8.63%	8.11%	5.51%
GMAR FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Moderate Buffer ETF - March	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both GMAR and FDND in my portfolio?

GMAR and FDND have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, GMAR or FDND?

FDND has higher volatility (7.14%) compared to GMAR (1.42%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GMAR dropped -9.11% vs FDND's -24.12%.

Which ETF is better, GMAR or FDND?

On 1-year performance, GMAR leads with 13.54% vs -3.53% for FDND. On fees, FDND is cheaper at 0.75% per year. On volatility, GMAR has been the lower-risk option at 1.42%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, GMAR or FDND?

Over the 1-year period, GMAR has performed better with a 13.54% return vs -3.53%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, GMAR or FDND?

FDND is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for GMAR.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, GMAR or FDND?

FDND has the higher dividend yield at 8.63%, compared with 0.00% for GMAR.

What is the main difference between GMAR and FDND?

GMAR is categorized as Options Trading, while FDND is Technology Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for GMAR and 0.75% for FDND.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

GMAR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.47 vs -0.19), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.