PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GMAQX vs. SIEMX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GMAQX vs. SIEMX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GMO Emerging Markets ex-China Fund (GMAQX) and SEI Institutional International Trust Emerging Markets Equity Fund (SIEMX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GMAQX achieves a 56.32% return, which is significantly higher than SIEMX's 27.48% return.


GMAQX

1D
3.50%
1M
28.37%
YTD
56.32%
6M
62.83%
1Y
91.37%
3Y*
34.47%
5Y*
10Y*

SIEMX

1D
2.45%
1M
9.56%
YTD
27.48%
6M
30.59%
1Y
56.23%
3Y*
23.58%
5Y*
6.93%
10Y*
9.93%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GMAQX vs. SIEMX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
GMAQX
GMO Emerging Markets ex-China Fund
56.32%32.09%0.62%27.41%-32.38%0.47%
SIEMX
SEI Institutional International Trust Emerging Markets Equity Fund
27.48%35.90%4.31%9.81%-21.51%-2.86%

Correlation

The correlation between GMAQX and SIEMX is 0.87, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.87

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.78

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 19, 2021

0.81

The correlation between GMAQX and SIEMX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.78 to 0.87 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GMAQX vs. SIEMX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GMAQX
GMAQX Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
GMAQX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GMAQX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9797
Sortino Ratio Rank
GMAQX Omega Ratio Rank: 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
GMAQX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
GMAQX Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank

SIEMX
SIEMX Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
SIEMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SIEMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
SIEMX Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
SIEMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
SIEMX Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GMAQX vs. SIEMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GMO Emerging Markets ex-China Fund (GMAQX) and SEI Institutional International Trust Emerging Markets Equity Fund (SIEMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GMAQXSIEMXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

4.49

3.33

+1.17

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

6.01

4.14

+1.87

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.93

1.63

+0.30

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

6.62

4.21

+2.40

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

25.51

16.77

+8.74

GMAQX vs. SIEMX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GMAQX Sharpe Ratio is 4.49, which is higher than the SIEMX Sharpe Ratio of 3.33. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GMAQX and SIEMX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GMAQXSIEMXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.49

3.33

+1.17

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.42

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.57

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.79

0.28

+0.51

Drawdowns

GMAQX vs. SIEMX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GMAQX drawdown since its inception was -41.97%, smaller than the maximum SIEMX drawdown of -65.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GMAQX and SIEMX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GMAQXSIEMXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-41.97%

-65.22%

+23.25%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.77%

-13.59%

-0.18%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.64%

-16.41%

-3.23%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-37.68%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.76%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-16.75%

-21.45%

+4.70%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.57%

3.42%

+0.15%

Volatility

GMAQX vs. SIEMX - Volatility Comparison

GMO Emerging Markets ex-China Fund (GMAQX) has a higher volatility of 12.53% compared to SEI Institutional International Trust Emerging Markets Equity Fund (SIEMX) at 7.29%. This indicates that GMAQX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SIEMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GMAQXSIEMXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

12.53%

7.29%

+5.24%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

18.52%

14.81%

+3.71%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.84%

17.65%

+3.19%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.22%

16.66%

+0.56%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.22%

17.50%

-0.28%

GMAQX vs. SIEMX - Expense Ratio Comparison

GMAQX has a 0.67% expense ratio, which is lower than SIEMX's 1.71% expense ratio.


Dividends

GMAQX vs. SIEMX - Dividend Comparison

GMAQX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.03%, more than SIEMX's 3.38% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GMAQX
GMO Emerging Markets ex-China Fund
6.03%9.43%32.28%6.76%4.94%0.66%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SIEMX
SEI Institutional International Trust Emerging Markets Equity Fund
3.38%4.30%3.20%1.58%2.08%9.55%0.53%1.09%0.63%1.26%0.80%0.81%

Frequently Asked Questions


GMAQX and SIEMX have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GMAQX has higher volatility (12.53%) compared to SIEMX (7.29%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GMAQX dropped -41.97% vs SIEMX's -65.22%.

GMAQX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.49 vs 3.33), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GMAQX and SIEMX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer