GMAQX vs. GMOQX
GMAQX (GMO Emerging Markets ex-China Fund) and GMOQX (GMO Emerging Country Debt Fund Class VI) are both mutual funds - GMAQX is a Emerging Markets Diversified fund managed by GMO, while GMOQX is a Emerging Markets Bonds fund actively managed by GMO. Over the past 3 years, GMAQX returned 34.94%/yr vs 20.13%/yr for GMOQX. At a 0.41 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. GMAQX charges 0.67%/yr vs 0.51%/yr for GMOQX.
Performance
GMAQX vs. GMOQX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GMAQX achieves a 57.96% return, which is significantly higher than GMOQX's 8.73% return.
GMAQX
- 1D
- 1.05%
- 1M
- 28.51%
- YTD
- 57.96%
- 6M
- 64.09%
- 1Y
- 93.54%
- 3Y*
- 34.94%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GMOQX
- 1D
- 0.33%
- 1M
- 1.67%
- YTD
- 8.73%
- 6M
- 9.27%
- 1Y
- 26.78%
- 3Y*
- 20.13%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GMAQX vs. GMOQX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GMAQX GMO Emerging Markets ex-China Fund | 57.96% | 32.09% | 0.62% | 27.41% | -32.38% | 0.47% |
GMOQX GMO Emerging Country Debt Fund Class VI | 8.73% | 22.45% | 12.60% | 17.76% | -16.26% | -0.98% |
Correlation
The correlation between GMAQX and GMOQX is 0.39, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.39 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.38 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 19, 2021 | 0.41 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GMAQX vs. GMOQX — Risk / Return Rank
GMAQX
GMOQX
GMAQX vs. GMOQX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GMO Emerging Markets ex-China Fund (GMAQX) and GMO Emerging Country Debt Fund Class VI (GMOQX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GMAQX | GMOQX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 4.51 | 5.17 | -0.66 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 6.03 | 9.24 | -3.21 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.94 | 2.28 | -0.35 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 6.82 | 7.21 | -0.39 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 26.25 | 31.30 | -5.05 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GMAQX | GMOQX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.51 | 5.17 | -0.66 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.81 | 0.74 | +0.07 |
Drawdowns
GMAQX vs. GMOQX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GMAQX drawdown since its inception was -41.97%, which is greater than GMOQX's maximum drawdown of -31.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GMAQX and GMOQX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GMAQX | GMOQX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -41.97% | -31.41% | -10.56% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.77% | -3.82% | -9.95% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.64% | -9.02% | -10.62% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -16.74% | -9.71% | -7.03% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.57% | 0.88% | +2.69% |
Volatility
GMAQX vs. GMOQX - Volatility Comparison
GMO Emerging Markets ex-China Fund (GMAQX) has a higher volatility of 12.47% compared to GMO Emerging Country Debt Fund Class VI (GMOQX) at 1.49%. This indicates that GMAQX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GMOQX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GMAQX | GMOQX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.47% | 1.49% | +10.98% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 18.53% | 4.37% | +14.16% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.81% | 5.33% | +15.48% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.22% | 10.88% | +6.34% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.22% | 10.88% | +6.34% |
GMAQX vs. GMOQX - Expense Ratio Comparison
GMAQX has a 0.67% expense ratio, which is higher than GMOQX's 0.51% expense ratio.
Dividends
GMAQX vs. GMOQX - Dividend Comparison
GMAQX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.97%, more than GMOQX's 5.86% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GMAQX GMO Emerging Markets ex-China Fund | 5.97% | 9.43% | 32.28% | 6.76% | 4.94% | 0.66% |
GMOQX GMO Emerging Country Debt Fund Class VI | 5.86% | 6.37% | 6.23% | 10.36% | 13.87% | 7.44% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GMAQX and GMOQX have a correlation of 0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GMAQX has higher volatility (12.47%) compared to GMOQX (1.49%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GMAQX dropped -41.97% vs GMOQX's -31.41%.
GMOQX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (5.17 vs 4.51), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GMAQX and GMOQX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer