PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GMAQX vs. GIOTX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GMAQX vs. GIOTX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GMO Emerging Markets ex-China Fund (GMAQX) and GMO International Developed Equity Allocation Fund (GIOTX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GMAQX achieves a 53.39% return, which is significantly higher than GIOTX's 16.53% return.


GMAQX

1D
-0.09%
1M
6.86%
YTD
53.39%
6M
57.21%
1Y
84.71%
3Y*
33.03%
5Y*
10Y*

GIOTX

1D
-2.56%
1M
-0.11%
YTD
16.53%
6M
15.94%
1Y
38.65%
3Y*
26.90%
5Y*
14.00%
10Y*
12.44%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GMAQX vs. GIOTX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
GMAQX
GMO Emerging Markets ex-China Fund
53.39%32.09%0.62%27.41%-32.38%0.47%
GIOTX
GMO International Developed Equity Allocation Fund
16.53%43.70%10.66%21.03%-12.41%0.02%

Correlation

The correlation between GMAQX and GIOTX is 0.62, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.62

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.67

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 18, 2021

0.72

The correlation between GMAQX and GIOTX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.62 to 0.72 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GMAQX vs. GIOTX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GMAQX
GMAQX Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
GMAQX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GMAQX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
GMAQX Omega Ratio Rank: 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
GMAQX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
GMAQX Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank

GIOTX
GIOTX Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
GIOTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GIOTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
GIOTX Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
GIOTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
GIOTX Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GMAQX vs. GIOTX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GMO Emerging Markets ex-China Fund (GMAQX) and GMO International Developed Equity Allocation Fund (GIOTX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


GMAQXGIOTXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.15

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.28

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.75

1.46

+0.29

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

6.14

3.79

+2.35

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

21.86

14.84

+7.02

GMAQX vs. GIOTX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GMAQX Sharpe Ratio is 3.69, which is higher than the GIOTX Sharpe Ratio of 2.54. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GMAQX and GIOTX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

GMAQX vs. GIOTX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GMAQX drawdown since its inception was -41.97%, smaller than the maximum GIOTX drawdown of -56.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GMAQX and GIOTX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GMAQXGIOTXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-41.97%

-56.51%

+14.54%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.77%

-10.66%

-3.11%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.64%

-13.40%

-6.24%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.34%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.29%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.89%

-2.56%

-0.33%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-16.60%

-14.20%

-2.40%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.86%

2.72%

+1.14%

Volatility

GMAQX vs. GIOTX - Volatility Comparison

GMO Emerging Markets ex-China Fund (GMAQX) has a higher volatility of 11.46% compared to GMO International Developed Equity Allocation Fund (GIOTX) at 5.81%. This indicates that GMAQX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GIOTX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GMAQXGIOTXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.46%

5.81%

+5.65%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

20.95%

12.95%

+8.00%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.97%

15.93%

+7.04%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.70%

15.52%

+2.18%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.70%

16.17%

+1.53%

GMAQX vs. GIOTX - Expense Ratio Comparison

GMAQX has a 0.67% expense ratio, which is higher than GIOTX's 0.00% expense ratio.


Dividends

GMAQX vs. GIOTX - Dividend Comparison

GMAQX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.15%, less than GIOTX's 6.90% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GIOTX
GMO International Developed Equity Allocation Fund
6.90%8.04%5.07%6.54%4.45%6.67%4.48%3.74%3.90%3.15%4.04%3.39%
GMAQX
GMO Emerging Markets ex-China Fund
6.15%9.43%32.28%6.76%4.94%0.66%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


GMAQX and GIOTX have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GMAQX has higher volatility (11.46%) compared to GIOTX (5.81%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GMAQX dropped -41.97% vs GIOTX's -56.51%.

GMAQX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.69 vs 2.54), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GMAQX and GIOTX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer