PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GMAQX vs. DFETX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GMAQX vs. DFETX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GMO Emerging Markets ex-China Fund (GMAQX) and DFA Emerging Markets II Portfolio (DFETX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GMAQX achieves a 41.31% return, which is significantly higher than DFETX's 20.12% return.


GMAQX

1D
-2.55%
1M
-4.59%
6M
32.96%
YTD
41.31%
1Y
62.14%
3Y*
27.80%
5Y*
10Y*

DFETX

1D
-3.26%
1M
-4.62%
6M
14.60%
YTD
20.12%
1Y
38.02%
3Y*
20.27%
5Y*
8.96%
10Y*
9.86%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GMAQX vs. DFETX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
GMAQX
GMO Emerging Markets ex-China Fund
41.31%32.09%0.62%27.41%-32.38%0.47%
DFETX
DFA Emerging Markets II Portfolio
20.12%33.54%6.86%13.11%-16.84%-2.09%

Correlation

The correlation between GMAQX and DFETX is 0.89, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.89

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.86

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 18, 2021

0.86

The correlation between GMAQX and DFETX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.86 to 0.89 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GMAQX vs. DFETX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GMAQX
GMAQX Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
GMAQX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GMAQX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
GMAQX Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
GMAQX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
GMAQX Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank

DFETX
DFETX Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
DFETX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DFETX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
DFETX Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
DFETX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
DFETX Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GMAQX vs. DFETX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GMO Emerging Markets ex-China Fund (GMAQX) and DFA Emerging Markets II Portfolio (DFETX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


GMAQXDFETXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.69

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.96

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.52

1.36

+0.16

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.56

3.03

+1.53

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.42

10.67

+3.75

GMAQX vs. DFETX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GMAQX Sharpe Ratio is 2.56, which is higher than the DFETX Sharpe Ratio of 1.87. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GMAQX and DFETX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

GMAQX vs. DFETX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GMAQX drawdown since its inception was -41.97%, smaller than the maximum DFETX drawdown of -62.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GMAQX and DFETX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GMAQXDFETXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-41.97%

-62.33%

+20.36%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.77%

-12.84%

-0.93%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.64%

-16.13%

-3.51%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.48%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.20%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-10.54%

-8.86%

-1.68%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-16.51%

-15.63%

-0.88%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.35%

3.62%

+0.73%

Volatility

GMAQX vs. DFETX - Volatility Comparison

GMO Emerging Markets ex-China Fund (GMAQX) and DFA Emerging Markets II Portfolio (DFETX) have volatilities of 11.40% and 10.96%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GMAQXDFETXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.40%

10.96%

+0.44%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

22.87%

19.35%

+3.52%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

24.55%

20.82%

+3.73%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.08%

16.72%

+1.36%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.08%

16.93%

+1.15%

GMAQX vs. DFETX - Expense Ratio Comparison

GMAQX has a 0.67% expense ratio, which is higher than DFETX's 0.37% expense ratio.


Dividends

GMAQX vs. DFETX - Dividend Comparison

GMAQX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.70%, more than DFETX's 6.86% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DFETX
DFA Emerging Markets II Portfolio
6.86%8.24%3.50%3.84%9.30%19.29%11.79%12.48%8.49%1.93%2.40%3.40%
GMAQX
GMO Emerging Markets ex-China Fund
11.70%9.43%32.28%6.76%4.94%0.66%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


GMAQX and DFETX have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GMAQX has higher volatility (11.40%) compared to DFETX (10.96%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GMAQX dropped -41.97% vs DFETX's -62.33%.

GMAQX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.56 vs 1.87), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GMAQX and DFETX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer