PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GMAMX vs. MAFIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GMAMX vs. MAFIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Goldman Sachs Multi-Strategy Alternatives Fund (GMAMX) and Abbey Capital Multi Asset Fund Class I (MAFIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GMAMX achieves a 7.66% return, which is significantly lower than MAFIX's 13.53% return.


GMAMX

1D
0.35%
1M
2.31%
YTD
7.66%
6M
8.14%
1Y
16.30%
3Y*
6.80%
5Y*
3.45%
10Y*
3.15%

MAFIX

1D
0.23%
1M
4.22%
YTD
13.53%
6M
15.28%
1Y
34.23%
3Y*
11.01%
5Y*
8.08%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GMAMX vs. MAFIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
GMAMX
Goldman Sachs Multi-Strategy Alternatives Fund
7.66%15.10%-5.08%2.45%-4.96%5.92%6.09%7.34%-0.30%
MAFIX
Abbey Capital Multi Asset Fund Class I
13.53%8.41%8.99%5.02%4.08%14.79%24.89%21.63%-1.46%

Correlation

The correlation between GMAMX and MAFIX is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.81

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.21

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.27

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 7, 2018

0.41

Over the past year, GMAMX and MAFIX have become more correlated (0.81) than their long-term average of 0.41, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GMAMX vs. MAFIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GMAMX
GMAMX Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
GMAMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4444
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GMAMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4242
Sortino Ratio Rank
GMAMX Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
GMAMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
GMAMX Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank

MAFIX
MAFIX Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
MAFIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MAFIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
MAFIX Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
MAFIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
MAFIX Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GMAMX vs. MAFIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs Multi-Strategy Alternatives Fund (GMAMX) and Abbey Capital Multi Asset Fund Class I (MAFIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GMAMXMAFIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.81

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.95

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.39

1.49

-0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.76

4.74

-0.98

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.23

16.70

-4.48

GMAMX vs. MAFIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GMAMX Sharpe Ratio is 1.95, which is comparable to the MAFIX Sharpe Ratio of 2.77. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GMAMX and MAFIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GMAMXMAFIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.95

2.77

-0.81

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.60

0.66

-0.06

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.58

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.47

1.03

-0.55

Drawdowns

GMAMX vs. MAFIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GMAMX drawdown since its inception was -13.27%, smaller than the maximum MAFIX drawdown of -19.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GMAMX and MAFIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GMAMXMAFIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-13.27%

-19.21%

+5.94%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.32%

-7.26%

+2.94%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-10.85%

-19.21%

+8.36%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-13.27%

-19.21%

+5.94%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-13.27%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.09%

0.00%

-0.09%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.20%

-3.41%

-0.79%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.33%

2.05%

-0.72%

Volatility

GMAMX vs. MAFIX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Goldman Sachs Multi-Strategy Alternatives Fund (GMAMX) is 1.37%, while Abbey Capital Multi Asset Fund Class I (MAFIX) has a volatility of 2.69%. This indicates that GMAMX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MAFIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GMAMXMAFIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.37%

2.69%

-1.32%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.79%

8.84%

-3.05%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.31%

12.43%

-4.12%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.81%

12.32%

-6.51%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.45%

12.84%

-7.39%

GMAMX vs. MAFIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

GMAMX has a 1.16% expense ratio, which is lower than MAFIX's 1.79% expense ratio.


Dividends

GMAMX vs. MAFIX - Dividend Comparison

GMAMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.62%, less than MAFIX's 10.37% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GMAMX
Goldman Sachs Multi-Strategy Alternatives Fund
7.62%8.20%4.85%3.19%0.22%0.00%0.00%0.60%0.00%0.00%1.37%1.66%
MAFIX
Abbey Capital Multi Asset Fund Class I
10.37%11.78%4.57%3.80%4.12%10.65%10.29%12.30%9.36%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


GMAMX and MAFIX have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MAFIX has higher volatility (2.69%) compared to GMAMX (1.37%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GMAMX dropped -13.27% vs MAFIX's -19.21%.

MAFIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.77 vs 1.95), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GMAMX and MAFIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer