GLXU vs. TSMG
GLXU (T-REX 2X Long GLXY Daily Target ETF) and TSMG (Leverage Shares 2X Long TSM Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Their 0.49 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. GLXU charges 1.50%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for TSMG.
Performance
GLXU vs. TSMG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GLXU achieves a -54.73% return, which is significantly lower than TSMG's 48.29% return.
GLXU
- 1D
- -4.82%
- 1M
- -34.44%
- 6M
- -69.56%
- YTD
- -54.73%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
TSMG
- 1D
- -0.01%
- 1M
- -15.99%
- 6M
- 27.89%
- YTD
- 48.29%
- 1Y
- 127.86%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 82.91%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $1.31M | $1.48M | $2.98M | |
| $3.62M | $4.60M | $4.37M |
GLXU vs. TSMG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
GLXU T-REX 2X Long GLXY Daily Target ETF | -54.73% | -55.12% |
TSMG Leverage Shares 2X Long TSM Daily ETF | 48.29% | 46.56% |
Correlation
The correlation between GLXU and TSMG is 0.49, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 8, 2025 | 0.49 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GLXU vs. TSMG — Risk / Return Rank
GLXU
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
TSMG
GLXU vs. TSMG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T-REX 2X Long GLXY Daily Target ETF (GLXU) and Leverage Shares 2X Long TSM Daily ETF (TSMG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GLXU | TSMG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.25 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 2.89 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 8.76 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GLXU vs. TSMG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GLXU drawdown since its inception was -92.21%, which is greater than TSMG's maximum drawdown of -63.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GLXU and TSMG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GLXU | TSMG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -92.21% | -63.67% | -28.54% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -40.36% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -89.94% | -30.88% | -59.06% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -60.77% | -17.02% | -43.75% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 13.29% | — |
Volatility
GLXU vs. TSMG - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GLXU | TSMG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 28.22% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 67.16% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 183.78% | 82.37% | +101.41% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 183.78% | 85.13% | +98.65% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 183.78% | 85.13% | +98.65% |
GLXU vs. TSMG - Expense Ratio Comparison
GLXU has a 1.50% expense ratio, which is higher than TSMG's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
GLXU vs. TSMG - Dividend Comparison
GLXU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 16.48%, more than TSMG's 7.74% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
GLXU T-REX 2X Long GLXY Daily Target ETF | 16.48% | 7.46% |
TSMG Leverage Shares 2X Long TSM Daily ETF | 7.74% | 11.48% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GLXU and TSMG have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, TSMG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
TSMG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for GLXU.
GLXU has the higher dividend yield at 16.48%, compared with 7.74% for TSMG.
They also come from different issuers: T-Rex and Leverage Shares. Their fees differ too: 1.50% for GLXU and 0.75% for TSMG.
Find the right allocation for GLXU and TSMG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer