GLUE vs. XTNT
GLUE (Monte Rosa Therapeutics, Inc.) and XTNT (Xtant Medical Holdings, Inc.) are both stocks. Both are in the Healthcare sector — GLUE in Biotechnology, XTNT in Medical Devices. Over the past 5 years, GLUE returned -0.45%/yr vs -24.04%/yr for XTNT. At a 0.13 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
GLUE vs. XTNT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GLUE achieves a 32.08% return, which is significantly higher than XTNT's -45.47% return.
GLUE
- 1D
- 10.93%
- 1M
- 10.10%
- YTD
- 32.08%
- 6M
- 25.67%
- 1Y
- 346.34%
- 3Y*
- 44.95%
- 5Y*
- -0.45%
- 10Y*
- —
XTNT
- 1D
- -1.95%
- 1M
- -10.94%
- YTD
- -45.47%
- 6M
- -45.19%
- 1Y
- -27.54%
- 3Y*
- -19.19%
- 5Y*
- -24.04%
- 10Y*
- -33.15%
GLUE vs. XTNT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GLUE Monte Rosa Therapeutics, Inc. | 32.08% | 125.94% | 22.83% | -25.76% | -62.73% | -7.18% |
XTNT Xtant Medical Holdings, Inc. | -45.47% | 76.98% | -60.80% | 71.21% | 17.86% | -67.44% |
Correlation
The correlation between GLUE and XTNT is 0.17, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.18 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.13 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.13 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 24, 2021 | 0.13 |
Fundamentals
GLUE:
-$2.26
XTNT:
$0.09
GLUE:
27.74
XTNT:
0.32
GLUE:
$42.95M
XTNT:
$133.93M
GLUE:
$34.56M
XTNT:
$84.27M
GLUE:
-$139.25M
XTNT:
$22.15M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GLUE vs. XTNT — Risk / Return Rank
GLUE
XTNT
GLUE vs. XTNT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Monte Rosa Therapeutics, Inc. (GLUE) and Xtant Medical Holdings, Inc. (XTNT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GLUE | XTNT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +4.21 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +5.04 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.53 | 0.96 | +0.58 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 8.34 | -0.52 | +8.86 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 17.34 | -0.90 | +18.24 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GLUE vs. XTNT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GLUE drawdown since its inception was -94.08%, smaller than the maximum XTNT drawdown of -99.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GLUE and XTNT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GLUE | XTNT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -94.08% | -99.17% | +5.09% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -41.84% | -53.53% | +11.69% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -65.37% | -74.78% | +9.41% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -94.08% | -82.47% | -11.61% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -98.54% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -50.94% | -98.99% | +48.05% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -74.39% | -88.79% | +14.40% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 20.09% | 30.67% | -10.58% |
Volatility
GLUE vs. XTNT - Volatility Comparison
Monte Rosa Therapeutics, Inc. (GLUE) has a higher volatility of 19.17% compared to Xtant Medical Holdings, Inc. (XTNT) at 8.02%. This indicates that GLUE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XTNT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GLUE | XTNT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 19.17% | 8.02% | +11.15% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 55.34% | 32.99% | +22.35% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 93.10% | 59.59% | +33.51% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 101.00% | 73.59% | +27.41% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 101.00% | 113.47% | -12.47% |
Dividends
GLUE vs. XTNT - Dividend Comparison
Neither GLUE nor XTNT has paid dividends to shareholders.
Financials
GLUE vs. XTNT - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Monte Rosa Therapeutics, Inc. and Xtant Medical Holdings, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
GLUE and XTNT have a correlation of 0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GLUE has higher volatility (19.17%) compared to XTNT (8.02%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GLUE dropped -94.08% vs XTNT's -99.17%.
GLUE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.75 vs -0.46), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GLUE and XTNT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer