PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GLTP.L vs. XGLE.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GLTP.L vs. XGLE.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Invesco UK Gilts UCITS ETF Dist (GLTP.L) and Xtrackers Eurozone Government Bond UCITS ETF 1C (XGLE.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

GLTP.L is traded in GBp, while XGLE.L is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the XGLE.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GLTP.L achieves a -1.34% return, which is significantly lower than XGLE.L's -0.67% return.


GLTP.L

1D
0.25%
1M
1.64%
YTD
-1.34%
6M
-1.41%
1Y
2.02%
3Y*
2.16%
5Y*
-4.79%
10Y*

XGLE.L

1D
0.19%
1M
0.83%
YTD
-0.67%
6M
-0.96%
1Y
2.65%
3Y*
2.50%
5Y*
-2.15%
10Y*
0.62%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GLTP.L vs. XGLE.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
GLTP.L
Invesco UK Gilts UCITS ETF Dist
-1.34%5.35%-4.39%3.50%-24.95%-5.40%8.70%3.59%
XGLE.L
Xtrackers Eurozone Government Bond UCITS ETF 1C
-0.67%5.95%-2.94%4.66%-14.01%-9.34%10.68%2.00%

Correlation

The correlation between GLTP.L and XGLE.L is 0.53, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.53

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.62

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.61

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 22, 2019

0.56

The correlation between GLTP.L and XGLE.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.53 to 0.62 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GLTP.L vs. XGLE.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GLTP.L
GLTP.L Risk / Return Rank: 1313
Overall Rank
GLTP.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1414
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GLTP.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 1212
Sortino Ratio Rank
GLTP.L Omega Ratio Rank: 1313
Omega Ratio Rank
GLTP.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 1313
Calmar Ratio Rank
GLTP.L Martin Ratio Rank: 1414
Martin Ratio Rank

XGLE.L
XGLE.L Risk / Return Rank: 99
Overall Rank
XGLE.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XGLE.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
Sortino Ratio Rank
XGLE.L Omega Ratio Rank: 88
Omega Ratio Rank
XGLE.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
Calmar Ratio Rank
XGLE.L Martin Ratio Rank: 99
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GLTP.L vs. XGLE.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco UK Gilts UCITS ETF Dist (GLTP.L) and Xtrackers Eurozone Government Bond UCITS ETF 1C (XGLE.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GLTP.LXGLE.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.16

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.25

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.06

1.08

-0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.35

0.58

-0.23

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.94

1.30

-0.36

GLTP.L vs. XGLE.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GLTP.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.31, which is lower than the XGLE.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.47. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GLTP.L and XGLE.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GLTP.LXGLE.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.31

0.47

-0.16

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.45

-0.29

-0.17

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.07

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.26

0.24

-0.50

Drawdowns

GLTP.L vs. XGLE.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GLTP.L drawdown since its inception was -37.02%, which is greater than XGLE.L's maximum drawdown of -26.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GLTP.L and XGLE.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GLTP.LXGLE.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-37.02%

-26.78%

-10.24%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.69%

-4.53%

-1.16%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-7.66%

-6.20%

-1.46%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-34.89%

-20.99%

-13.90%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-26.78%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-28.38%

-18.89%

-9.49%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-18.68%

-10.13%

-8.55%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.15%

2.04%

+0.11%

Volatility

GLTP.L vs. XGLE.L - Volatility Comparison

Invesco UK Gilts UCITS ETF Dist (GLTP.L) has a higher volatility of 2.85% compared to Xtrackers Eurozone Government Bond UCITS ETF 1C (XGLE.L) at 2.02%. This indicates that GLTP.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XGLE.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GLTP.LXGLE.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.85%

2.02%

+0.83%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.22%

4.33%

+0.89%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.51%

5.58%

+0.93%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.58%

7.50%

+3.08%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

10.25%

8.54%

+1.71%

GLTP.L vs. XGLE.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

GLTP.L has a 0.06% expense ratio, which is lower than XGLE.L's 0.15% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

GLTP.L vs. XGLE.L - Dividend Comparison

GLTP.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.50%, while XGLE.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
GLTP.L
Invesco UK Gilts UCITS ETF Dist
4.50%4.39%4.33%3.24%1.62%0.81%0.81%0.72%
XGLE.L
Xtrackers Eurozone Government Bond UCITS ETF 1C
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


GLTP.L and XGLE.L have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, GLTP.L is cheaper at 0.06% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

GLTP.L is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for XGLE.L.

GLTP.L tracks FTSE Act UK Cnvt Gilts All Stocks TR GBP, while XGLE.L tracks Bloomberg Euro Agg Govt TR EUR. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and DWS. Their fees differ too: 0.06% for GLTP.L and 0.15% for XGLE.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GLTP.L and XGLE.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer