PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GLTP.L vs. J13E.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GLTP.L vs. J13E.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Invesco UK Gilts UCITS ETF Dist (GLTP.L) and JPMorgan BetaBuilders EUR Government Bond 1-3 UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) (J13E.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

GLTP.L is traded in GBp, while J13E.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the J13E.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GLTP.L achieves a -1.59% return, which is significantly lower than J13E.L's -1.09% return.


GLTP.L

1D
-0.60%
1M
0.49%
YTD
-1.59%
6M
-1.50%
1Y
2.00%
3Y*
1.93%
5Y*
-4.83%
10Y*

J13E.L

1D
-0.08%
1M
0.23%
YTD
-1.09%
6M
-1.10%
1Y
3.35%
3Y*
2.71%
5Y*
0.73%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GLTP.L vs. J13E.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
GLTP.L
Invesco UK Gilts UCITS ETF Dist
-1.59%5.35%-4.39%3.50%-24.95%-5.40%8.70%3.59%
J13E.L
JPMorgan BetaBuilders EUR Government Bond 1-3 UCITS ETF EUR (Acc)
-1.09%7.65%-1.69%1.45%0.25%-7.21%5.47%-2.14%

Correlation

The correlation between GLTP.L and J13E.L is 0.14, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.14

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.22

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.19

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 22, 2019

0.18

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GLTP.L vs. J13E.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GLTP.L
GLTP.L Risk / Return Rank: 1313
Overall Rank
GLTP.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1313
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GLTP.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 1212
Sortino Ratio Rank
GLTP.L Omega Ratio Rank: 1212
Omega Ratio Rank
GLTP.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 1313
Calmar Ratio Rank
GLTP.L Martin Ratio Rank: 1414
Martin Ratio Rank

J13E.L
J13E.L Risk / Return Rank: 2323
Overall Rank
J13E.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2424
Sharpe Ratio Rank
J13E.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 2424
Sortino Ratio Rank
J13E.L Omega Ratio Rank: 2222
Omega Ratio Rank
J13E.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 2626
Calmar Ratio Rank
J13E.L Martin Ratio Rank: 2222
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GLTP.L vs. J13E.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco UK Gilts UCITS ETF Dist (GLTP.L) and JPMorgan BetaBuilders EUR Government Bond 1-3 UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) (J13E.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GLTP.LJ13E.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.49

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.77

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.06

1.14

-0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.35

1.21

-0.86

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.94

2.73

-1.80

GLTP.L vs. J13E.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GLTP.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.31, which is lower than the J13E.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.80. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GLTP.L and J13E.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GLTP.LJ13E.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.31

0.80

-0.49

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.46

0.14

-0.59

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.27

0.01

-0.28

Drawdowns

GLTP.L vs. J13E.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GLTP.L drawdown since its inception was -37.02%, which is greater than J13E.L's maximum drawdown of -13.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GLTP.L and J13E.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GLTP.LJ13E.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-37.02%

-13.59%

-23.43%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.69%

-2.76%

-2.93%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-7.66%

-3.14%

-4.52%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-34.89%

-6.48%

-28.41%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-28.56%

-4.86%

-23.70%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-18.68%

-7.27%

-11.41%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.13%

1.22%

+0.91%

Volatility

GLTP.L vs. J13E.L - Volatility Comparison

Invesco UK Gilts UCITS ETF Dist (GLTP.L) has a higher volatility of 3.00% compared to JPMorgan BetaBuilders EUR Government Bond 1-3 UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) (J13E.L) at 1.23%. This indicates that GLTP.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than J13E.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GLTP.LJ13E.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.00%

1.23%

+1.77%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.22%

2.88%

+2.34%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.52%

4.18%

+2.34%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.58%

5.30%

+5.28%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

10.25%

6.28%

+3.97%

GLTP.L vs. J13E.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

GLTP.L has a 0.06% expense ratio, which is lower than J13E.L's 0.10% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

GLTP.L vs. J13E.L - Dividend Comparison

GLTP.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.51%, while J13E.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
GLTP.L
Invesco UK Gilts UCITS ETF Dist
4.51%4.39%4.33%3.24%1.62%0.81%0.81%0.72%
J13E.L
JPMorgan BetaBuilders EUR Government Bond 1-3 UCITS ETF EUR (Acc)
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.12%

Frequently Asked Questions


GLTP.L and J13E.L have a correlation of 0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, GLTP.L is cheaper at 0.06% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

GLTP.L is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.10% for J13E.L.

GLTP.L tracks FTSE Act UK Cnvt Gilts All Stocks TR GBP, while J13E.L tracks Bloomberg Euro Agg Govt 1-3 Yr TR EUR. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and JPMorgan. Their fees differ too: 0.06% for GLTP.L and 0.10% for J13E.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GLTP.L and J13E.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer