GLTP.L vs. GLTA.L
GLTP.L (Invesco UK Gilts UCITS ETF Dist) and GLTA.L (Invesco UK Gilts UCITS ETF Acc) are both European Government Bonds funds from Invesco tracking the FTSE Act UK Cnvt Gilts All Stocks TR GBP. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, GLTP.L returned -4.79%/yr vs -4.77%/yr for GLTA.L. With a 0.98 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. Both charge a 0.06% expense ratio.
Performance
GLTP.L vs. GLTA.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GLTP.L achieves a -1.34% return, which is significantly lower than GLTA.L's -1.16% return.
GLTP.L
- 1D
- 0.25%
- 1M
- 1.64%
- YTD
- -1.34%
- 6M
- -1.41%
- 1Y
- 2.02%
- 3Y*
- 2.16%
- 5Y*
- -4.79%
- 10Y*
- —
GLTA.L
- 1D
- 0.22%
- 1M
- 1.66%
- YTD
- -1.16%
- 6M
- -1.33%
- 1Y
- 1.96%
- 3Y*
- 2.19%
- 5Y*
- -4.77%
- 10Y*
- —
GLTP.L vs. GLTA.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GLTP.L Invesco UK Gilts UCITS ETF Dist | -1.34% | 5.35% | -4.39% | 3.50% | -24.95% | -5.40% | 8.70% | 1.45% |
GLTA.L Invesco UK Gilts UCITS ETF Acc | -1.16% | 4.99% | -4.18% | 3.52% | -25.15% | -5.17% | 8.71% | 1.44% |
Correlation
The correlation between GLTP.L and GLTA.L is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.96 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.98 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.99 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 11, 2019 | 0.98 |
The correlation between GLTP.L and GLTA.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.96 to 0.99 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GLTP.L vs. GLTA.L — Risk / Return Rank
GLTP.L
GLTA.L
GLTP.L vs. GLTA.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco UK Gilts UCITS ETF Dist (GLTP.L) and Invesco UK Gilts UCITS ETF Acc (GLTA.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GLTP.L | GLTA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.01 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.02 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.06 | 1.06 | 0.00 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.35 | 0.34 | +0.01 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.94 | 0.90 | +0.04 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GLTP.L | GLTA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.31 | 0.30 | +0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.45 | -0.45 | 0.00 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.26 | -0.29 | +0.03 |
Drawdowns
GLTP.L vs. GLTA.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GLTP.L drawdown since its inception was -37.02%, roughly equal to the maximum GLTA.L drawdown of -36.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GLTP.L and GLTA.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GLTP.L | GLTA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -37.02% | -36.99% | -0.03% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.69% | -5.70% | +0.01% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -7.66% | -7.70% | +0.04% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -34.89% | -34.87% | -0.02% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -28.38% | -28.33% | -0.05% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -18.68% | -19.08% | +0.40% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.15% | 2.17% | -0.02% |
Volatility
GLTP.L vs. GLTA.L - Volatility Comparison
Invesco UK Gilts UCITS ETF Dist (GLTP.L) and Invesco UK Gilts UCITS ETF Acc (GLTA.L) have volatilities of 2.85% and 2.77%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GLTP.L | GLTA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.85% | 2.77% | +0.08% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 5.22% | 5.12% | +0.10% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 6.51% | 6.47% | +0.04% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 10.58% | 10.56% | +0.02% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 10.25% | 10.31% | -0.06% |
GLTP.L vs. GLTA.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both GLTP.L and GLTA.L have an expense ratio of 0.06%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
GLTP.L vs. GLTA.L - Dividend Comparison
GLTP.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.50%, while GLTA.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GLTA.L Invesco UK Gilts UCITS ETF Acc | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
GLTP.L Invesco UK Gilts UCITS ETF Dist | 4.50% | 4.39% | 4.33% | 3.24% | 1.62% | 0.81% | 0.81% | 0.72% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.96, GLTP.L and GLTA.L move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
Both ETFs have the same 0.06% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
GLTP.L and GLTA.L have the same expense ratio: 0.06% per year.
Both ETFs track FTSE Act UK Cnvt Gilts All Stocks TR GBP.
Find the right allocation for GLTP.L and GLTA.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer