GLTA.L vs. VETA.L
GLTA.L (Invesco UK Gilts UCITS ETF Acc) and VETA.L (Vanguard EUR Eurozone Government Bond UCITS ETF Accumulating) are both European Government Bonds funds - GLTA.L tracks the FTSE Act UK Cnvt Gilts All Stocks TR GBP while VETA.L tracks the Bloomberg Euro Agg Govt TR EUR. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, GLTA.L returned -4.77%/yr vs -2.10%/yr for VETA.L. A 0.58 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. GLTA.L charges 0.06%/yr vs 0.07%/yr for VETA.L.
Performance
GLTA.L vs. VETA.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
GLTA.L is traded in GBp, while VETA.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the VETA.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GLTA.L achieves a -1.16% return, which is significantly lower than VETA.L's -0.82% return.
GLTA.L
- 1D
- 0.22%
- 1M
- 1.66%
- YTD
- -1.16%
- 6M
- -1.33%
- 1Y
- 1.96%
- 3Y*
- 2.19%
- 5Y*
- -4.77%
- 10Y*
- —
VETA.L
- 1D
- 0.23%
- 1M
- 0.78%
- YTD
- -0.82%
- 6M
- -0.92%
- 1Y
- 2.67%
- 3Y*
- 2.47%
- 5Y*
- -2.10%
- 10Y*
- —
GLTA.L vs. VETA.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GLTA.L Invesco UK Gilts UCITS ETF Acc | -1.16% | 4.99% | -4.18% | 3.52% | -25.15% | -5.17% | 8.71% | 1.44% |
VETA.L Vanguard EUR Eurozone Government Bond UCITS ETF Accumulating | -0.82% | 5.79% | -2.93% | 4.76% | -13.59% | -9.77% | 10.65% | -2.52% |
Correlation
The correlation between GLTA.L and VETA.L is 0.50, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.50 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.63 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.62 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 11, 2019 | 0.58 |
The correlation between GLTA.L and VETA.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.50 (1 year) to 0.63 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GLTA.L vs. VETA.L — Risk / Return Rank
GLTA.L
VETA.L
GLTA.L vs. VETA.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco UK Gilts UCITS ETF Acc (GLTA.L) and Vanguard EUR Eurozone Government Bond UCITS ETF Accumulating (VETA.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GLTA.L | VETA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.19 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.28 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.06 | 1.09 | -0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.34 | 0.57 | -0.23 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.90 | 1.29 | -0.38 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GLTA.L | VETA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.30 | 0.49 | -0.19 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.45 | -0.28 | -0.17 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.29 | -0.08 | -0.22 |
Drawdowns
GLTA.L vs. VETA.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GLTA.L drawdown since its inception was -36.99%, which is greater than VETA.L's maximum drawdown of -26.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GLTA.L and VETA.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GLTA.L | VETA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -36.99% | -26.60% | -10.39% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.70% | -4.66% | -1.04% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -7.70% | -6.23% | -1.47% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -34.87% | -20.71% | -14.16% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -28.33% | -18.72% | -9.61% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -19.08% | -15.05% | -4.03% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.17% | 2.07% | +0.10% |
Volatility
GLTA.L vs. VETA.L - Volatility Comparison
Invesco UK Gilts UCITS ETF Acc (GLTA.L) has a higher volatility of 2.77% compared to Vanguard EUR Eurozone Government Bond UCITS ETF Accumulating (VETA.L) at 1.85%. This indicates that GLTA.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VETA.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GLTA.L | VETA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.77% | 1.85% | +0.92% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 5.12% | 4.18% | +0.94% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 6.47% | 5.43% | +1.04% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 10.56% | 7.49% | +3.07% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 10.31% | 7.96% | +2.35% |
GLTA.L vs. VETA.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
GLTA.L has a 0.06% expense ratio, which is lower than VETA.L's 0.07% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
GLTA.L vs. VETA.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither GLTA.L nor VETA.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
GLTA.L and VETA.L have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, GLTA.L is cheaper at 0.06% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
GLTA.L is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.07% for VETA.L.
GLTA.L tracks FTSE Act UK Cnvt Gilts All Stocks TR GBP, while VETA.L tracks Bloomberg Euro Agg Govt TR EUR. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.06% for GLTA.L and 0.07% for VETA.L.
Find the right allocation for GLTA.L and VETA.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer