GLTA.L vs. PRIR.L

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

GLTA.L (Invesco UK Gilts UCITS ETF Acc) and PRIR.L (Amundi Prime Euro Govies UCITS ETF DR (D)) are both European Government Bonds funds - GLTA.L tracks the FTSE Act UK Cnvt Gilts All Stocks TR GBP while PRIR.L tracks the Bloomberg Euro Agg Govt TR EUR. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, GLTA.L returned -4.77%/yr vs -2.07%/yr for PRIR.L. At a 0.37 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. GLTA.L charges 0.06%/yr vs 0.05%/yr for PRIR.L.

Performance

GLTA.L vs. PRIR.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Invesco UK Gilts UCITS ETF Acc (GLTA.L) and Amundi Prime Euro Govies UCITS ETF DR (D) (PRIR.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GLTA.L achieves a -1.16% return, which is significantly lower than PRIR.L's -0.78% return.

GLTA.L

• 1D: 0.22%
• 1M: 1.66%
• YTD: -1.16%
• 6M: -1.33%
• 1Y: 1.96%
• 3Y*: 2.19%
• 5Y*: -4.77%
• 10Y*: —

PRIR.L

• 1D: 0.24%
• 1M: 0.90%
• YTD: -0.78%
• 6M: -0.88%
• 1Y: 2.66%
• 3Y*: 2.43%
• 5Y*: -2.07%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GLTA.L vs. PRIR.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
GLTA.L Invesco UK Gilts UCITS ETF Acc	-1.16%	4.99%	-4.18%	3.52%	-25.15%	-5.17%	8.71%	1.44%
PRIR.L Amundi Prime Euro Govies UCITS ETF DR (D)	-0.78%	5.74%	-3.03%	4.65%	-13.31%	-10.41%	10.86%	-1.62%

Correlation

The correlation between GLTA.L and PRIR.L is 0.49, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.49
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.48
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.44
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 11, 2019	0.37

The correlation between GLTA.L and PRIR.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.37 (all time) to 0.49 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

GLTA.L vs. PRIR.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GLTA.L

GLTA.L Risk / Return Rank: 13
GLTA.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 14
GLTA.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 12
GLTA.L Omega Ratio Rank: 13
GLTA.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 13
GLTA.L Martin Ratio Rank: 14

PRIR.L

PRIR.L Risk / Return Rank: 16
PRIR.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 17
PRIR.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 16
PRIR.L Omega Ratio Rank: 15
PRIR.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 17
PRIR.L Martin Ratio Rank: 15

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GLTA.L vs. PRIR.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco UK Gilts UCITS ETF Acc (GLTA.L) and Amundi Prime Euro Govies UCITS ETF DR (D) (PRIR.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	GLTA.L	PRIR.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.30	0.49	-0.18
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.46	0.74	-0.29
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.06	1.08	-0.03
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.34	0.59	-0.25
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	0.90	1.36	-0.45
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

GLTA.L vs. PRIR.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GLTA.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.30, which is lower than the PRIR.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.49. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GLTA.L and PRIR.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	GLTA.L	PRIR.L	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.30	0.49	-0.18
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.45	-0.31	-0.14
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.29	-0.12	-0.17

Drawdowns

GLTA.L vs. PRIR.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GLTA.L drawdown since its inception was -36.99%, which is greater than PRIR.L's maximum drawdown of -25.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GLTA.L and PRIR.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	GLTA.L	PRIR.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-36.99%	-25.98%	-11.01%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-5.70%	-4.70%	-1.00%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-7.70%	-6.17%	-1.53%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-34.87%	-20.58%	-14.29%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-28.33%	-18.21%	-10.12%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-19.08%	-18.53%	-0.55%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.17%	2.01%	+0.16%

Volatility

GLTA.L vs. PRIR.L - Volatility Comparison

Invesco UK Gilts UCITS ETF Acc (GLTA.L) has a higher volatility of 2.77% compared to Amundi Prime Euro Govies UCITS ETF DR (D) (PRIR.L) at 1.81%. This indicates that GLTA.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PRIR.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	GLTA.L	PRIR.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.77%	1.81%	+0.96%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	5.12%	4.31%	+0.81%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	6.47%	5.71%	+0.76%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	10.56%	8.66%	+1.90%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	10.31%	10.68%	-0.37%

GLTA.L vs. PRIR.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

GLTA.L has a 0.06% expense ratio, which is higher than PRIR.L's 0.05% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

GLTA.L vs. PRIR.L - Dividend Comparison

GLTA.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while PRIR.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.75%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
GLTA.L Invesco UK Gilts UCITS ETF Acc	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
PRIR.L Amundi Prime Euro Govies UCITS ETF DR (D)	2.75%	2.72%	2.07%	1.88%	1.83%	1.57%	1.64%	1.05%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both GLTA.L and PRIR.L in my portfolio?

GLTA.L and PRIR.L have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, GLTA.L or PRIR.L?

On fees, PRIR.L is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, GLTA.L or PRIR.L?

PRIR.L is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.06% for GLTA.L.

What is the main difference between GLTA.L and PRIR.L?

GLTA.L tracks FTSE Act UK Cnvt Gilts All Stocks TR GBP, while PRIR.L tracks Bloomberg Euro Agg Govt TR EUR. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.06% for GLTA.L and 0.05% for PRIR.L.