GLTA.L vs. CE01.L
GLTA.L (Invesco UK Gilts UCITS ETF Acc) and CE01.L (iShares Euro Government Bond 7-10yr UCITS ETF (Acc)) are both European Government Bonds funds - GLTA.L tracks the FTSE Act UK Cnvt Gilts All Stocks TR GBP while CE01.L tracks the Bloomberg Euro Agg Govt TR EUR. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, GLTA.L returned -4.77%/yr vs -2.20%/yr for CE01.L. A 0.60 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. GLTA.L charges 0.06%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for CE01.L.
Performance
GLTA.L vs. CE01.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GLTA.L achieves a -1.16% return, which is significantly lower than CE01.L's -0.91% return.
GLTA.L
- 1D
- 0.22%
- 1M
- 1.66%
- YTD
- -1.16%
- 6M
- -1.33%
- 1Y
- 1.96%
- 3Y*
- 2.19%
- 5Y*
- -4.77%
- 10Y*
- —
CE01.L
- 1D
- 0.23%
- 1M
- 0.98%
- YTD
- -0.91%
- 6M
- -0.95%
- 1Y
- 2.93%
- 3Y*
- 2.70%
- 5Y*
- -2.20%
- 10Y*
- 0.80%
GLTA.L vs. CE01.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GLTA.L Invesco UK Gilts UCITS ETF Acc | -1.16% | 4.99% | -4.18% | 3.52% | -25.15% | -5.17% | 8.71% | 1.44% |
CE01.L iShares Euro Government Bond 7-10yr UCITS ETF (Acc) | -0.91% | 6.87% | -3.53% | 6.60% | -15.38% | -9.55% | 10.06% | -3.24% |
Correlation
The correlation between GLTA.L and CE01.L is 0.54, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.54 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.66 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.65 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 11, 2019 | 0.60 |
The correlation between GLTA.L and CE01.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.54 (1 year) to 0.66 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GLTA.L vs. CE01.L — Risk / Return Rank
GLTA.L
CE01.L
GLTA.L vs. CE01.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco UK Gilts UCITS ETF Acc (GLTA.L) and iShares Euro Government Bond 7-10yr UCITS ETF (Acc) (CE01.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GLTA.L | CE01.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.19 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.29 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.06 | 1.09 | -0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.34 | 0.55 | -0.20 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.90 | 1.30 | -0.39 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GLTA.L | CE01.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.30 | 0.50 | -0.19 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.45 | -0.27 | -0.18 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.09 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.29 | 0.18 | -0.47 |
Drawdowns
GLTA.L vs. CE01.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GLTA.L drawdown since its inception was -36.99%, which is greater than CE01.L's maximum drawdown of -27.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GLTA.L and CE01.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GLTA.L | CE01.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -36.99% | -27.47% | -9.52% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.70% | -5.33% | -0.37% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -7.70% | -6.85% | -0.85% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -34.87% | -22.14% | -12.73% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -27.47% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -28.33% | -18.53% | -9.80% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -19.08% | -10.31% | -8.77% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.17% | 2.25% | -0.08% |
Volatility
GLTA.L vs. CE01.L - Volatility Comparison
Invesco UK Gilts UCITS ETF Acc (GLTA.L) has a higher volatility of 2.77% compared to iShares Euro Government Bond 7-10yr UCITS ETF (Acc) (CE01.L) at 1.98%. This indicates that GLTA.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CE01.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GLTA.L | CE01.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.77% | 1.98% | +0.79% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 5.12% | 4.61% | +0.51% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 6.47% | 5.88% | +0.59% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 10.56% | 8.21% | +2.35% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 10.31% | 8.83% | +1.48% |
GLTA.L vs. CE01.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
GLTA.L has a 0.06% expense ratio, which is lower than CE01.L's 0.15% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
GLTA.L vs. CE01.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither GLTA.L nor CE01.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
GLTA.L and CE01.L have a correlation of 0.54, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, GLTA.L is cheaper at 0.06% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
GLTA.L is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for CE01.L.
GLTA.L tracks FTSE Act UK Cnvt Gilts All Stocks TR GBP, while CE01.L tracks Bloomberg Euro Agg Govt TR EUR. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.06% for GLTA.L and 0.15% for CE01.L.
Find the right allocation for GLTA.L and CE01.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer